Added value of hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT and CT coronary angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1281-1288

  Schaap, Jeroen ^a,b   De Groot, Joris A H ^c   Nieman, Koen ^d   Meijboom, W Bob ^d   Boekholdt, S Matthijs ^e   Kauling, Robert M ^a   Post, Martijn C ^a   Van Der Heyden, Jan A ^a   De Kroon, Thom L ^b   Rensing, Benno J W M ^a   Moons, Karel G M ^c   Verzijlbergen, J Fred ^b,d  

^a AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coronary computed tomography angiography; Hybrid imaging; Myocardial perfusion SPECT

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; METOPROLOL TARTRATE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ADULT; ANGIOGRAPHIC CATHETER; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY CALCIUM SCORE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CT-SPECT SCANNER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; GAMMA CAMERA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NETHERLANDS; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SCINTISCANNING;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NETHERLANDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; RISK FACTORS; TECHNETIUM TC 99M SESTAMIBI; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84919922278     PISSN: 20472404     EISSN: 20472412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu135     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. WijnsW, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di MC, Falk V, Folliguet T et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio- Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2501-55.
2. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HVetal.Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010;362:886-95.
3. Fox K, GarciaMA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1341-81.
4. Oudkerk M, Stillman AE, Halliburton SS, Kalender WA, Mohlenkamp S, McColloughCHet al. Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:645-71.
5. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin JG, Greenland Petal. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114: 1761-91.
6. Schaap J, Kauling RM, Boekholdt SM, Post MC, Van der Heyden JA, de Kroon TL et al. Usefulness of coronary calcium scoring to myocardial perfusion SPECT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in a predominantly high risk population. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:677-84.
7. Gottlieb I, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A,Dewey M, Clouse ME, Sara L et al. The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:627-34.
8. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, Burgstahler C, Cademartiri F, de FPetal. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008;29:531-56.
9. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS et al. ACC/ AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-summaryarticle: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:159-68.
10. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, Roguin A, Soil A, Dragu R et al. Integrated singlephoton emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1059-67.
11. Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I, Husmann L, Scheffel H, Duerst V et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience. J Nucl Med 2007;48:696-703.
12. Slomka PJ, Cheng VY, Dey D,Woo J, Ramesh A, Van KS et al. Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion SPECT anatomically guided by coregistered 64-slice coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009;50:1621-30.
13. Schaap J, Kauling RM, Boekholdt SM, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, PostMCet al. Incremental diagnostic accuracy of hybrid SPECT/CT coronary angiography in a population with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:642-9.
14. Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, Pietila M, Ukkonen H, Saraste A et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 2010; 122:603-13.
15. Gaemperli O, Husmann L, Schepis T, Koepfli P, Valenta I, Jenni W et al. Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? Eur Heart J 2009;30:2921-9.
16. Moons KG, de Groot JA, Linnet K, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM. Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker. Clin Chem 2012;58:1408-17.
17. Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1350-8.
18. FrakerTD Jr, Fihn SD, Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J et al. 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. Circulation 2007;116:2762-72.
19. Diamond GA. Right answer, wrong question: on the clinical relevance of the cardiovascular history. Circulation 2011;124:2377-9.
20. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, IrwigLMet al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARDInitiative. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:40-4.
21. Moons KG, Grobbee DE. When should we remain blind and when should our eyes remain open in diagnostic studies? J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:633-6.
22. Ascoop CA, van Zeijl LG, Pool J, Simoons M. Cardiac exercise testing-I indications, staff, equipment, conduct and procedures. Guidelines for cardiac exercise testing. Neth J Cardiol 1994;2:1-11.
23. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531-40.
24. Abidov A, Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Kang X et al. Are shades of gray prognostically useful in reporting myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:290-8.
25. Berman DS, Abidov A, Kang X, HayesSW, Friedman JD, SciammarellaMGet al. Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:414-23.
26. Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, Desai MY, Mamuya W, Thomson L et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:190-204.
27. Schaap J, Kauling RM, Boekholdt SM, Post MC, Van der Heyden JA, de Kroon TL et al. Zero coronary calcium in the presence of severe isolated left main stenosis detected byCTcoronary angiography in a patient with typical angina and equivocal myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:165-8.
28. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek JKJ et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-8.
29. Rubin DB. Inferences and missing data. Biometrika 1976;63:581-90.
30. Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:1087-91.
31. de Groot JA, Janssen KJ, Zwinderman AH, Moons KG, Reitsma JB. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited. Stat Med 2008;27: 5880-9.
32. Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG. Development and validation of a prediction model with missing predictor data: a practical approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:205-14.
33. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for non Respons in Surveys. New york: Wiley; 1987.
34. Moons KG, Biesheuvel CJ, Grobbee DE. Test research versus diagnostic research. Clin Chem 2004;50:473-6.
35. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation and Updating. New York: Springer; 2008.
36. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of anewmarker: from area under theROCcurve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008;27:157-72.
37. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer program]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2004.
38. Dedic A, Rossi A, Ten Kate GJ, Neefjes LA, Galema TW, Moelker A et al. First-line evaluation of coronary artery disease with coronary calcium scanning or exercise electrocardiography. Int J Cardiol 2013;163:190-5.
39. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, HarbinsonMet al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31: 261-91.
40. Groutars RG, Verzijlbergen JF, Tiel-van BuulMM, Zwinderman AH, Ascoop CA, van Hemel NMet al. The accuracy of 1-day dual-isotope myocardial SPECT in a population with high prevalence of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003;19: 229-38.
41. Hamirani YS, Isma'eel H, Larijani V, Drury P, LimW, Bevinal M et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-detector cardiac computed tomography compared with stress nuclear imaging in patients undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:645-51.
42. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-32.
43. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:2135-44.
44. Abidov A, Raff GL. Value of coronary CTA in patients with known or suspected CAD and non-diagnostic initial myocardial perfusion testing: current evidence and clinical considerations. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:1101-6.
45. Flotats A, Knuuti J, Gutberlet M, Marcassa C, Bengel FM, Kaufmann PA et al. Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT.Ajoint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:201-12.
46. Schaap J, de Groot JA, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, Boekholdt SM, Post MC et al. Hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris lead to similar treatment decisions. Heart 2013;99:188-94.
47. Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, Nieman K et al. A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1316-30.
48. Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG, Nieman K, Galema TW, Mollet NR et al. Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts. BMJ 2012;344:e3485.
49. Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Bengel FM, Bober R et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1639-53.
50. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De BB, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2816-21.