The diagnostic accuracy of 64-detector cardiac computed tomography compared with stress nuclear imaging in patients undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 645-651

  Hamirani, Yasmin S ^a   Isma'eel, Hussain ^a   Larijani, Vahid ^a   Drury, Paul ^a   Lim, Wayland ^a   Bevinal, Manzoor ^a   Saeed, Anila ^a   Ahmadi, Nasser ^a   Karlsberg, Ronald P ^b   Budoff, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Cardiovascular Consultants Medical Group INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac catheterization; Cardiac computed tomographic angiography; Correlation; Nuclear imaging

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSELS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DISEASES; HEART; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PARTICLE BEAMS;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATIONS; CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CARDIAC-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIES; CORRELATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; NUCLEAR IMAGING; PERFUSION IMAGING;

SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADENOSINE; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; TECHNETIUM 99M; THALLIUM 201; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SCINTISCANNING;

AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77958134207     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181e3d0b1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Choi EK, Choi SI, Rivera JJ, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:357-365.
2. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, et al. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1161-1170. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
3. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: Non-invasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2373-2381. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
4. Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, et al. Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome: Plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:216-222.
5. Mir-Akbari H, Ripsweden J, Jensen J, et al. Limitations of 64Ydetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography: Calcium and motion but not short experience. Acta Radiol. 2009:50:174-180.
6. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:147-154.
7. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for prediction of cardiac death: Differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 97:535-543.
8. Maddahi J, Van Train K, Prigent F, et al. Quantitative single photon emission computerized thallium-201 tomography for evaluation of coronary artery disease: Optimization and prospective validation of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1689-1699.
9. Van Train K, Maddahi J, Berman DS, et al. Quantitative analysis of tomographic stress thallium-201 myocardial scintigrams: A multicenter trial. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1168-1179.
10. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827-832.
11. Callister TQ, Cooil B, Raya SP, et al. Coronary artery disease: Improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology. 1998;208:807-814.
12. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37:2170-2214.
13. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5-40.
14. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema W, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2508-2514.
15. Stein PD, Yaekoub AY, Matta F, et al. 64-Slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review. Am J Med. 2008;121: 715-725.
16. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552-557.
17. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislcie spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:2051-2054.
18. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive angiography: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896-1910.
19. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: First experience. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1482-1487.
20. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005;112:2318-2323.
21. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA, et al. Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1658-1665.
22. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1761-1791.
23. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64Ymultidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (assessment by coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724-1732.
24. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359: 2324-2336.
25. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: A prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135-2144.
26. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F, et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: First clinical experiences. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1294-1300.
27. Hacker M, Jakobs T, Hack N, et al. Sixty four slice spiral CT angiography does not predict the functional relevance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:4-10.
28. Gallagher MJ, Ross MA, Raff GL, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:125-136.
29. Budoff MJ, Kazerooni EA, Thomas GS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive 64-row computed tomographic coronary angiography (CCTA) compared with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI): The PICTURE study, a prospective multicenter trial. Circulation. 2008;118:S935.
30. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, et al. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA. 1998;280:913-920.
31. Budoff MJ, Gillespie R, Georgiou D, et al. Comparison of ultrafast computed tomography and sestamibi in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:682-687.
32. Budoff MJ, Rasouli ML, Shavelle DM, et al. Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)Va comparison in detecting significant coronary artery disease. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:252-257.
33. McCrohon JA, Moon JCC, Prasad SK, et al. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2003;108:54-59.
34. Dilsizian V, Arrighi JA, Diodati JG, et al. Myocardial viability in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Comparison of 99m Tc-sestamibi with thallium reinjection and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. Circulation. 1994;89:578-587.