Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 28, 2008, Pages 5880-5889

  De Groot, J A H ^a,b   Janssen, K J M ^a   Zwinderman, A H ^b   Moons, K G M ^a   Reitsma, J B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Begg and greenes; Complete case analysis; Diagnostic research; Multiple imputation; Verification bias

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EPIDEMIOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 60849135164     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3410     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Reitsma JB, Rutjes AWS, Khan KS, Coomarasamy A, Bossuyt P. NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme: a systematic review of methods to evaluate tests when there is no gold standard. URL: http://www.hta.ac.uk/project/1573.asp (accessed on 8 July 2008).
2. Begg CB, Greenes RA. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. Biometrics 1983; 39:207-215.
3. Harel O, Zhou XH. Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:3769-3786.
4. Hanley JA, Dendukuri N, Begg CB. Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias by Ofer Harel and Xiao-Hua Zhou. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:3769-3786; Statistics in Medicine 2006; 26:3046-3047.
5. Harel O, Zhou XH. Rejoinder to multiple imputation for correcting verification bias. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 26:3047-3050.
6. van Buuren S, Oudshoorn K. Flexible multivariate imputation by mice. Technical Report, TNO prevention 13 and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1999. Available from: http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/publications/Flexible%20multivariate%20-%20TNO99054%201999.pdf (accessed on 8 July 2008).
7. Harrell FE. Hmisc: a library of miscellaneous S functions, 2008. http:biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/s/Hmisc (accessed on 8 July 2008).
8. SAS software, Version 9.1 of the SAS System for Windows. Copyright © 2007 SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, U.S.A. http://www.sas.com (accessed on 8 July 2008).
9. Moons KG, Donders RA, Stijnen T, Harrell Jr FE. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006; 59:1092-1101.
10. van der Heijden GJ, Donders AR, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006; 59:1102-1109.