Effects of interdependence and social interaction-based person-team fit

Administrative Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 26-46

  Glew, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdependence; Person team fit; Work teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919651100     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20763387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/admsci2010026     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. O’Toole, J.; Lawler III, E.E. The New American Workplace; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
2. Lewin, K. Dynamic Theory of Personality; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1935.
3. Schneider, B. Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In Research in Organizational Behavior; Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L., Eds.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, USA, 1983; Volume 5, pp. 1-31.
4. Kristof-Brown, A.L.; Zimmerman, R.D.; Johnson, E.C. Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Pers. Psychol. 2005, 58, 281-342.
5. French, J.R.P.; Rogers, Jr., W.; Cobb, S. Adjustment as person-environment fit. In Coping and Adaptation; Coelho, G.V., Hamburg, D.A., Adams, J.E., Eds.; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 1974; pp. 316-333.
6. Holland, J.L. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1985.
7. Edwards, J.R. Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Cooper, C.L., Robertson, I.T., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: New York, NY, USA, 1991; Volume 6, pp. 283-357.
8. Kristof, A.L. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers. Psychol. 1996, 49, 1-49.
9. Witt, L.A. Enhancing goal congruence: A solution to organizational politics. J. Appl. Psychol. 1998, 83, 666-674.
10. Werbel, J.D.; Johnson, D.J. The use of person-group fit for employment selection: A missing link in person-environment fit. Hum. Resour. Manage. 2001, 40, 227-240.
11. Ferris, G.R.; Youngblood, S.A.; Yates, V.L. Personality, training performance, and withdrawal: A test of the person-group fit hypothesis for organizational newcomers. J. Vocat. Behav. 1985, 27, 377-388.
12. Vancouver, J.B.; Millsap, R.E.; Peters, P.A. Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. J. Appl. Psychol. 1994, 79, 666-679.
13. Adkins, C.L.; Ravlin, E.C.; Meglino, B.M. Value congruence between co-workers and its relationship to work outcomes. Group Organ. Manage. 1996, 21, 439-460.
14. Kristof-Brown, A.L.; Stevens, C.K. Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members’ personal mastery and performance goals matter? J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 1083-1095.
15. Hollenbeck, J.R.; Moon, H.; Ellis, A.P.J.; West, B.J.; Ilgen, D.R.; Sheppard, L.; Porter, C.O.L.H.; Wagner, J.A., III. Structural contingency theory and individual differences: Examination of external and internal person-team fit. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 599-606.
16. Burch, G.St.J.; Anderson, N. Measuring person-team fit: Development and validation of the team selection inventory. J. Manage. Psychol. 2004, 19, 406-426.
17. Adkins, B.; Caldwell, D. Firm or subgroup culture: Where does fitting in matter most? J. Organ. Behav. 2004, 25, 969-978.
18. Hollenbeck, J.R. A structural approach to external and internal person-team fit. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 2000, 49, 534-549.
19. DeRue, D.S.; Morgeson, F.P. Stability and change in person-team and person-role fit over time: The effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 92, 1242-1253.
20. Hackman, J.R. The design of work teams. In Handbook of Organizational Behavior; Lorsch, J.W., Compiler; Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1987.
21. Conway, T.L.; Vickers, R.R.; French, J.R.P., Jr. An application of person-environment fit theory: Perceived versus desired control. J. Soc. Issues 1992, 48, 95-107.
22. Saavedra, R.; Early, P.C.; Van Dyne, L. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 1993, 78, 61-72.
23. Cheng, J.L.C. Interdependence and coordination in organizations: A role-system analysis. Acad. Manage. J. 1983, 26, 156-162.
24. Thompson, J.D. Organizations in Action; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1967.
25. Shea, G.P.; Guzzo, R.A. Groups as human resources. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management; Rowland, K., Ferris, G., Eds.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, USA, 1987; Volume 5, pp. 323-356.
26. Van Vijfeijken, H.; Kleingeld, A.; Van Tuijl, H.; Algera, J.A.; Thierry, H. Interdependence and fit in team performance management. Pers. Rev. 2006, 35, 98-117.
27. Schneider, B. E = f(P,B): The road to a radical approach to person-environment fit. J. Vocat. Behav. 1987, 31, 222-230.
28. Wagner, J.A. Studies of individualism-collectivism: Concept and measure. Group Organ. Stud. 1995, 11, 280-303.
29. McClelland, D.C. Human Motivation; Scott Foresman: Glenview, IL, USA, 1985.
30. Steers, R.M.; Braunstein, D.N. A behaviorally-based measure of manifest needs in work settings. J. Vocat. Behav. 1976, 9, 251-266.
31. Cheek, J.M.; Buss, A.H. Shyness and sociability. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1981, 41, 330-339.
32. Locke, E.A. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; Dunnette, M., Eds.; Rand McNally: Chicago, IL, USA, 1976; pp. 1297-1350.
33. Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA, 1975.
34. Mowday, R.; Steers, R.; Porter, L. Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1979.
35. O’Reilly, C.A., III.; Chatman, J.; Caldwell, D.F. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Manage. J. 1991, 34, 487-516.
36. Morris, J.H.; Steers, R.M. Structural influences in organizational commitment. J. Vocat. Behav. 1980, 17, 50-57.
37. Lewis, J.; Weigert, A. Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces 1985, 63, 967-985.
38. Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1995, 20, 709-734.
39. Dirks, K.T. The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 1999, 84, 445-455.
40. Ravlin, E.C.; Ritchie, C.M. Perceived and actual organizational fit: Multiple influences on attitudes. J. Manage. Issues 2006, 18, 175-192.
41. O’Reilly, C.A., III.; Chatman, J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization of prosocial behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 1986, 71, 492-499.
42. Chatman, J.A. Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1989, 14, 333-349.
43. Goodman, S.A.; Svyantek, D.J. Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter? J. Vocat. Behav. 1999, 55, 254-275.
44. Elfenbein, H.A.; O’Reilly III, C.A. Fitting in: The effects of relational demography and person-culture fit on group process and performance. Group Organ. Manage. 2007, 32, 109-142.
45. Campion, M.A.; Papper, E.M.; Medsker, G.J. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Pers. Psychol. 1996, 49, 429-452.
46. Bretz, R.D.; Judge, T.A. Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. J. Vocat. Behav. 1994, 44, 32-54.
47. Wageman, R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1995, 40, 145-180.
48. Edwards, A.L. Edwards Personal Preference Schedule; The Psychological Corporation: New York, NY, USA, 1953.
49. Jackson, D.N. Personality Research Form Manual; Research Psychologists Press, Inc.: Foshen, NY, USA, 1974.
50. Pearce, J.L.; Gregersen, H.B. Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. J. Appl. Psychol. 1991, 76, 838-844.
51. Caplan, R.D. Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. J. Vocat. Behav. 1987, 31, 248-267.
52. Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 1999, 84, 123-136.
53. Kaiser, H.F. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39, 31-36.
54. Stewart, D.W. The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research. J. Marketing Res. 1981, 18, 51-62.
55. Kivimaki, M.; Kuk, G.; Elovainio, M.; Thomson, L.; Kalliomaki-Levanto, T.; Heikkila, A. The Team Climate Inventory (TCI)—Four or five factors? Testing the structure of TCI in samples of low and high complexity jobs. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. 1997, 70, 375-390.
56. Mishra, D.P.; Heide, J.B.; Cort, S.G. Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. J. Marketing Res. 1998, 35, 277-296.
57. Bedeian, A.G.; Ferris, G.R.; Kacmar, K.M. Age, tenure, and job satisfaction: A tale of two perspectives. J. Vocat. Behav. 1992, 40, 33-48.
58. Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1991.
59. Venkatraman, N. The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1989, 14, 423-444.
60. Meyer, J.P.; Irving, P.G.; Allen, N.J. Examination of the combined effects of work values and early work experiences on organizational commitment. J. Organ. Behav. 1998, 19, 29-52.
61. Puccio, G.J.; Talbot, R.J.; Joniak, A.J. Person-environment fit: Examining the use of commensurate scales. Psychol. Rep. 1995, 76, 931-938.
62. Sutton, G.; Griffin, M.A. Integrating expectations, experiences, and psychological contract violations: A longitudinal study of new professionals. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. 2004, 77, 493-514.
63. Cohen, J.; Cohen, P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1983.
64. Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manage. 1986, 12, 531-544.
65. Kristof-Brown, A.L.; Colbert, A.E.; Jansen, K.J. A policy-capturing study of the simultaneous effects of fit with jobs, groups and organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 985-993.
66. Molleman, E.; Nauta, A.; Jehn, K.A. Person-job fit applied to teamwork: A multilevel approach. Small Gr. Res. 2004, 35, 515-539.
67. Shin, Y. A person-environment fit model for virtual organizations. J. Manage. 2004, 30, 725-743.
68. Schneider, B.; Goldstein, H.W.; Smith, D.B. The ASA framework: An update. Pers. Psychol. 1995, 48, 747-773.
69. Gully, S.M.; Incalcaterra, K.A.; Joshi, A.; Beaubieu, J.M. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 2002, 87, 819-832.
70. Kalleberg, A.L. The mismatched worker: When people don’t fit their jobs. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 2008, 22, 24-40.
71. Werbel, J.D.; DeMarie, S.M. Aligning strategic human resource management and person-environment fit. Hum. Resour. Manage. R. 2005, 15, 247-262.