On the development of the social response context model

The Science of Social Influence: Advances and Future Progress

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 193-221

  Nail, Paul R ^a   MacDonald, Geoff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919562720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (121)

1. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2. Allen, V L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 133-175). New York: Academic Press.
3. Allen, V L., & Levine, J. M. (1969). Consensus and conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 389-399.
4. Allen, V L. & Wilder, D. A. (1979). Social support in absentia: The effect of an absentee partner on conformity. Human Relations, 32, 103-111.
5. Allport, F H. (1934). The J-curve hypothesis of conforming behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 141-183.
6. Argyle, M. (1957). Social pressure in public and private situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 172-175.
7. Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, W McGuire, T Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5-27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
8. Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103-126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion ofjudgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
10. Asch, S. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.
11. Asch, S. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9, Whole No. 416).
12. Back, K. W, & Bogdonoff, M. D. (1964). Plasma lipid responses to leadership, conformity, and deviation. In P. H. Leiderman & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Psychobiological approaches to social behavior (pp. 24-42). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Baer, R., Hinkle, S., Smith, K., & Fenton, M. (1980). Reactance as a function of actual versus projected autonomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 416-422.
14. Baron, R. A., & Kepner, C. R. (1970). Model's behavior and attraction to the model as determinants of adult aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 335-344.
15. Baron, R. S., Vandello, J. A., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927.
16. Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.
17. Boyanowsky, E. O., & Allen, V L. (1973). Ingroup norms and self-identity as determinants of discriminatory behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 408-418.
18. Brehm, J. W (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
19. Brehm, J. W., & Mann, M. (1975). Effect of importance of freedom and attraction to group members on influence produced by group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 816-825.
20. Bryan, J. H., & Test, M. A. (1967). Models and helping: Naturalistic studies in aiding behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 400-407.
21. Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J. (1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 457-468.
22. Cooper, J., & Jones, E. E. (1969). Opinion divergence as a strategy to avoid being miscast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 23-30.
23. Crutchfield, R. S. (1962). Conformity and creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 120-140). New York: Atherton.
24. Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377-383.
25. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
26. Developments on gay marriage issue. (2004, March 5). Yahoo! News. Retrieved March 9, 2004, from http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/gay_marriage_developments
27. Doms, M., & Van Avermaet, E. (1980). Majority influence, minority influence and conversion behavior: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 283-292.
28. Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541-553.
29. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W, & Fishbaugh, L. (1981). Sex differences in conformity: Surveillance by the group as a determinant of male nonconformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 384-394.
30. Feinsand, M. (2003, October 12). Zimmer issues apology. Major League Baseball: News. Retrieved March 17, 2004, from http://www.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/news/mlb_news.jsp?ymd=20031012&content_id=576551&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb
31. Feshbach, N. D. (1967). Nonconformity to experimentally induced group norms of highstatus versus low-status members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 55-63.
32. Festinger, L. (1953). An analysis of compliant behavior. In M. Sherif & M. O. Wilson (Eds.), Group relations at the crossroads (pp. 232-256). New York: Harper.
33. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 203-210.
34. Frager, R. (1970). Conformity and anticonformity in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 203-210.
35. Frankl, V. E. (1967). Logotherapy. Israel Annals of Psychiatry and Related Disciplines, 5, 142-155.
36. Friend, R., Rafferty, Y., & Bramel, D. (1990). A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch "conformity" study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 29-44.
37. Gamson, W A., Fireman, B. & Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with unjust authority. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
38. Gerard, H. B., Wilhelmy, R. A., & Conolley, E. S. (1968). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 79-82.
39. Goethals, G. R., & Perlstein, A. L. (1978). Level of instigation and model similarity as determinants of aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 4, 115-124.
40. Guimond, S. (1999). Attitude change during college: Normative or informational social influence? Social Psychology of Education, 2, 237-261.
41. Harton, H. C., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2004). Cultural elements emerge from dynamic social impact. In M. Schaller & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 41-75). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
42. Heilman, M. E., & Toffler, B. L. (1976). Reacting to reactance: An interpersonal interpretation of the need for freedom. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 519-521.
43. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent information influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 139-182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Hornsey, M. J., Majkut, L., Terry, D. J., & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). On being loud and proud: Non-conformity, and counter-conformity to group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 319-335.
45. Insko, C. A., Smith, R. H., Alicke, M. D., Wade, J., & Taylor, S. (1985). Conformity and group size: The concern with being right and the concern with being liked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 41-50.
46. Jahoda, M. (1956). Psychological issues in civil liberties. American Psychologist, 11, 234-240.
47. Jahoda, M. (1959). Conformity and independence. Human Relations, 12, 99-120.
48. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
49. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.
50. Kelman, H. C. (1974). Attitudes are alive and well and gainfully employed in the sphere of action. American Psychologist, 29, 310-324.
51. Kiesler, C. A. (1969). Group pressure and conformity. In J. Müls (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 233-306). New York: Macmillan.
52. Kiesler, C. A., & Kiesler, S. B. (1969). Conformity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53. Krech, D., Crutchfield, R. S., & Ballachey, E. L. (1962). Individual in society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
54. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
55. Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215-221.
56. Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 307-324.
57. Levy, D. A. (1992). The liberating effects of interpersonal influence: An empirical investigation of disinhibitory contagion. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 469-473.
58. Levy, D. A., Collins, B. E., & Nail, P. R. (1998). A new model of interpersonal influence characteristics. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 715-733.
59. Levy, D. A., & Nail, P. R. (1993). Contagion: A theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 119, 233-284.
60. Loriedo, C. & Vella, G. (1992). Paradox and the family system. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
61. Lucas, T., Alexander, S. A., Firestone, I. J., & Baltes, B. B. (2006). Self efficacy and independence from social influence: Discovery of an efficacy-difficulty effect. Social Influence, 1, 58-80.
62. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D. (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 197-215.
63. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
64. MacDonald, G., & Nail, P. R. (2005). Attitude change and the public-private attitude distinction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 15-28.
65. MacDonald, G., Nail, P. R., & Levy, D. A. (2004). Expanding the scope of the Social Response Context Model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 77-92.
66. McFarland, C., Ross, M., & Conway, M. (1984). Self-persuasion and self-presentation as mediators of anticipatory attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 529-540.
67. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V, Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817.
68. Maslach, C., Santee, R. T., & Wade, C. (1987). Individuation, gender role, and dissent: Personality mediators of situational forces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1088-1093.
69. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
70. Milgram, S., Bickman, L., & Berkowitz, L. (1969). Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 79-82.
71. Monteith, M. J., Spicer, C. V, & Tooman, G. D. (1998). Consequences of stereotype suppression: Stereotypes on and not on the rebound. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 355-377.
72. Montgomery, R. L. (1992). Social influence and conformity: A transorientational model. In D. Granberg & G. Sarup (Eds.), Social judgment and intergroup relations: Essays in honor of Muzafer Sherif (pp. 175-200). New York: Springer-Verlag.
73. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
74. Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the response of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-379.
75. Mullen, B. (1986). Stuttering, audience size, and the other-total ratio: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 139-149.
76. Nail, P. R. (1986). Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 190-206.
77. Nail, P. R., Harton, H. C., & Decker, B. P. (2003). Political orientation and modern versus aversive racism: Tests of Dovidio and Gaertner's (1998) integrated model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 754-770.
78. Nail, P. R., & Helton, W. B. (1999). On the distinction between behavioral contagion, conversion conformity, and compliance conformity. North American Journal of Psychology, 1, 87-94.
79. Nail, P. R., MacDonald, G., & Levy, D. A. (2000). Proposal of a four-dimensional model of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 454-470.
80. Nail, P. R., & Ruch, G. L. (1990). A demonstration of the reformulated diamond model of social response. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 711-722.
81. Nail, P. R., & Ruch, G. L. (1992). Social influence and the diamond model of social response: Toward an extended theory of informational influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 171-187.
82. Nail, P. R., & Thompson, P. L. (1990). An analysis and empirical demonstration of the concept of self-anticonformity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 151-162.
83. Nail, P. R., & Van Leeuwen, M. D. (1993). An analysis and restructuring of the diamond model of social response. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 106-116.
84. Nail, P. R., Van Leeuwen, M. D., & Powell, A. B. (1996). The effectance versus the self-presentational view of reactance: Are importance ratings influenced by anticipated surveillance? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 573-584.
85. Nemeth, C. J., & Chiles, C. (1988). Modeling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 275-280.
86. Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1974). Creating the perceptions of consistency and confidence: A necessary condition for minority influence. Sociometry, 37, 529-540.
87. Nemeth, C. J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45-55.
88. Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
89. Osman, L. (1982). Conformity or compliance? A study of sex differences in pedestrian behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 19-21.
90. Pennebaker, J. W., & Sanders, D. Y. (1976). American graffiti: Effects of authority and reactance arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 264-267.
91. Phillips, D. P. (1974). The influence of suggestion on suicide: Substantive and theoretical implications of the Werther effect. American Sociological Review, 39, 340-354.
92. Phillips, D. P. (1989). Recent advances in suicidology: The study of imitative suicide. In R. F W. Diekstra, R. Maris, S. Platt, A. Schmidtke, & G. Sonneck (Eds.), Suicide and its prevention: The role of attitude and imitation (pp. 299-312). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
93. Plesser-Storr, D., & Tedeschi, J. T (1999). Self-presentation of men to attractive and unattractive women: Cognitive vs. motivational explanations. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York, Albany.
94. Pool, G. J., Wood, W., & Leck, K. (1998). The self-esteem motive in social influence: Agreement with valued majorities and disagreement with derogated minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 967-975.
95. Quinn, A., & Schlenker, B. R. (2002). Can accountability produce independence? Goals as determinants of the impact of accountability on conformity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 472-483.
96. Redl, F (1949). The phenomenon of contagion and "shock effect" in group therapy. In K. R. Eissler (Ed.), Searchlight on delinquency (pp. 315-328). New York: International Universities Press.
97. Rosenberg, L. A. (1961). Group size, prior experience and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 436-437.
98. Rushton, J. P., & Campbell, A. C. (1977). Modeling, vicarious reinforcement and extraversion on blood donating in adults: Immediate and long-term effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 297-306.
99. Russell, J. C., Wilson, D. O., & Jenkins, J. F (1976). Informational properties of jaywalking models as determinants of imitated jaywalking: An extension to model sex, race and number. Sociometry, 39, 270-273.
100. Santee, R. T, & Maslach, C. (1982). To agree or not to agree: Personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 690-700.
101. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
102. Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F (1990). Self-consciousness and self-presentation: Being autonomous versus appearing autonomous. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 820-828.
103. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27, 1-60.
104. Smith, S., Murphy, D. B., & Wheeler, L. (1964). Relation of intelligence and authoritarianism to behavioral contagion and conformity. Psychological Reports, 14, 248.
105. Sorrels, J. P., & Kelley J. (1984). Conformity by omission. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 302-305.
106. Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181.
107. Swim, J. K., Ferguson, M. J., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Avoiding stigma by association: Subtle prejudice against lesbians in the form of social distancing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 61-68.
108. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.
109. Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., & Bonoma, T V (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26, 685-695.
110. Walker, M., Harriman, S., & Costello, S. (1980). The influence of appearance on compliance with a request. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 159-160.
111. Wheeler, L. (1966). Toward a theory of behavioral contagion. Psychological Review, 73, 179-192.
112. Wheeler, L., & Caggiula, A. R. (1966). The contagion of aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 1-10.
113. Wheeler, L., & Levine, L. (1967). Observer-model similarity in the contagion of aggression. Sociometry, 30, 41-49.
114. Wheeler, L., & Smith, S. (1967). Censure of the model in the contagion of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 93-98.
115. Wilder, D. A. (1977). Perception of groups, size of opposition, and social influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 253-268.
116. Willis, R. H. (1963). Two dimensions of conformity-nonconformity. Sociometry, 26, 499-513.
117. Willis, R. H. (1965a). Conformity, independence, and anticonformity. Human Relations, 18, 373-388.
118. Willis, R. H. (1965b). Descriptive models of social re. s-pon. se. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
119. Wood, W, Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T (1994). Minority influence: A metaanalytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
120. Wood, W, Pool, G. J., Leck, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181-1193.
121. Wright, R. A. (1986). Attitude change as a function of threat to attitudinal freedom and extent of agreement with a communicator. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 43-50.