Transdisciplinary environmental science: Problem-oriented projects and strategic research programs

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 299-306

  Groß, Matthias ^a   Stauffacher, Michael ^b  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919417789     PISSN: 03080188     EISSN: 17432790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/0308018814Z.00000000093     Document Type: Editorial

References (43)

1. Bäckstrand, Karin. 2003. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 3(4): 24-41.
2. Behrens, Vivien and Matthias Groß. 2010. Customisation of Transdisciplinary Collaboration in the Integrated Management of Contaminated Sites. In Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, ed. John N. Parker, Niki Vermeulen and Bart Penders, 139-160. Farnham: Ashgate.
3. Bergmann, Matthias, Thomas Jahn, Tobias Knobloch, Wolfgang Krohn, Christian Pohl and Engelbert Schramm. 2012. Methods for Transdisciplinary Research: A Primer for Practice. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
4. Böhme, Gernot, Wolfgang van den Daele and Wolfgang Krohn. 1976. Finalization in Science, Social Science Information 15(2/3): 307-330.
5. Etzkowitz, Henry and Loet Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and. Mode 2. to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29(2): 109-123.
6. Fischer, Arnout R. H., Hilde Tobi and Amber Ronteltap. 2011. When Natural met Social: A Review of Collaboration between the Natural and Social Sciences. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 36(4): 341-358.
7. Frickel, Scott. 2004. Building an interdiscipline: Collective Action Framing and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology. Social Problems 51(2): 269-287.
8. Frodeman, Bob, Julie Thompson Klein and Carl Mitcham, ed. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Funtowicz, Silvio O. and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739-755.
10. Future Earth. 2013. Future Earth Initial Design: Report of the Transition Team. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU).
11. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scottand Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
12. Groß, Matthias. 2004. Human Geography and Ecological Sociology: The Unfolding of a Human Ecology, 1890 to 1930. and Beyond. Social Science History 28(4): 575-605.
13. Groß, Matthias, Holger Hoffmann-Riem and Wolfgang Krohn. 2003. Realexperimente: Robustheit und Dynamik ökologischer Gestaltungen in der Wissensgesellschaft, Soziale Welt 54(3): 241-258.
14. Groß, Matthias and Wolfgang Krohn. 2005. Society as Experiment: Sociological Foundations for a Self-experimental Society. History of the Human Sciences 18(2): 63-86.
15. Häberli, Rudolf, Roland W. Scholz, Alain Bill and Myrtha Welti, ed. 2000. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem-Solving Among Science, Technology and Society. Workbook I: Dialogue Sessions and Idea Market. Zürich: Haffmans Sachbuch Verlag.
16. Hessels, Laurens K. and Harro Van Lente. 2008. Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37(4): 740-760.
17. Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude, Holger Hoffmann-Riem, Susette Biber-Klemm, Walter Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Dominique Joye, Christian Pohl, Urs Wiesmann and Elisabeth Zemp, ed. 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Heidelberg: Springer.
18. Hirsch, Paul D. and Valerie A. Luzadis. 2013. Scientific Concepts and Their Policy Affordances: How a Focus on Compatibility can Improve Science-Policy Interaction and Outcomes. Nature + Culture 8(1): 97-118.
19. Horlick-Jones, Tom and Jonathan Sime. 2004. Living on the border: Knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36(4): 441-456.
20. Jacobs, Jerry A. 2013. In Defense of Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity and Specialization in the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Jahn, Thomas, Matthias Bergmann and Florian Keil. 2012. Transdisciplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization. Ecological Economics 79(1): 1-10.
22. Jantsch, Eric. 1970. Inter-and Transdisciplinary University: A Systems Approach to Education and Innovation. Policy Sciences 1: 403-428.
23. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2012. Science and Public Reason. London: Routledge.
24. Karvonen, Andrew and Bas van Heur. 2014. Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 38(2): 379-392.
25. Klein, Julie Thompson, Walter Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Rudolf Häberli, Alain Bill, Roland W. Scholz and Myrtha Welti, ed. 2001. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. An Effective Way for Managing Complexity. Basel: Birkhäuser.
26. Kullman, Kim. 2013. Geographies of Experiment/Experimental Geographies: A Rough Guide. Geography Compass 7(12): 879-894.
27. Lang, Daniel J, Arnim Wiek, Matthias Bergmann, Michael Stauffacher, Pim Martens, Peter Moll, Mark Swilling and Christopher J Thomas. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 7: 25-43.
28. Lawrence, Roderick J. 2004. Housing and health: from interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures 36: 487-502.
29. Lövbrand, Eva, Pielke, Roger J. and Silke Beck. 2011. A democracy paradox in studies of science and technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 36(4): 474-496.
30. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scottand Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. Pohl, Christian and Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn. 2007. Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research. München: Oekom.
32. Ramadier, Thierry. 2004. Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures. 36: 423-439.
33. Ravetz, Jerome. 2012. The Significance of the Hamburg Workshop: Post-Normal Science and the Maturing of Science. Nature + Culture 7(2): 133-150.
34. Renn, Ortwin. 2014. Towards a Socio-Ecological Foundation for Environmental Risk Research. In Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, ed. Stewart Lockie, David A. Sonnenfeld and Dana R. Fisher, 207-220. London: Routledge.
35. Rip, Ari. 2011. The future of research universities. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation 29(4): 443-453.
36. Scholz, Roland W., Daniel J. Lang, Arnim Wiek, Alexander I. Walter and Michael Stauffacher. 2006. Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: historical framework and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 7(3): 226-251.
37. Sillitoe, Paul, ed. 2007. Local Science vs Global Science: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge in International Development. New York: Berghahn.
38. Stauffacher, Michael, Thomas Flüeler, Pius Krütli and Roland W. Scholz. 2008. Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: a transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21: 409-422.
39. Stilgoe, Jack, Simon J. Lock, and James Wilsdon. 2014. Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 4-15.
40. Stokols, Daniel. 2006. Toward a Science of Transdisciplinary Action Research. American Journal of Community Psychology 38(1): 63-77.
41. Tress, Bärbel, and Gunther Tress. 2001. Capitalising on Multiplicity: A Transdisciplinary Systems Approach to Landscape Research. Landscape and Urban Planning. 57: 143-157.
42. Weiland, Sabine, Vivien Weiss and John Turnpenny. 2013. Introduction: Science in Policy Making. Nature + Culture 8(1): 1-7.
43. Ziman, John. 1996. Post-academic Science.: Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms. Science Studies 9(1): 67-80.