The significance of the hamburg workshop: Post-normal science and the maturing of science

Nature and Culture

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 133-150

  Ravetz, Jerome ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate science; Non violence; Post normal science; Quality

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; POLICY APPROACH; THEORETICAL STUDY; VIOLENCE;

GERMANY; HAMBURG [GERMANY];

EID: 84864411081     PISSN: 15586073     EISSN: 15585468     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3167/nc.2012.070202     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anonymous. 2010. No Candour, no Trust. New Scientist 207 (2769): 4.
2. Anonymous. 2011. Editorial: Value Judgements. Nature 473 (7346): 123-124.
3. Curry, Judith. 2011a. Reasoning About Climate Uncertainty. Climatic Change 108 (4): 723-732.
4. Curry, Judith. 2011b. Pseudo-Science Versus Skepticism. Climate Etc., 21 February. http:// judithcurry.com/2011/02/21/psuedo-science-versus-skepticism/ (accessed 1 March 2012).
5. Dwyer, John, and Laura Hood. 2011. Beddington Goes to War Against Bad Science. Research Fortnight. 14 February. http://www.researchresearch.com/index.php ?option=com_news&template=rr_2col&view=article&articleId=1032320 (accessed 1 March 2012).
6. Funtowicz, Silvio, and Jerome Ravetz. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Keenan, Douglas J. 2011. Tree Rings. 14 May. http://www.informath.org/apprise/ a3900.htm. (accessed 1 March 2012).
8. Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9. Latham, Jonathan. 2011. The Failure of the Genome. Guardian (18 April): 25.
10. Lewin, Bernie. 2010. The Anatomy of Virtuous Corruption. Enthusiasm, Scepticism and Science. June 15. http://enthusiasmscepticismscience.wordpress.com/ 2010/06/25/the-anatomy-of-virtuous-corruption-disagreements-permissibleunmentionable-and-inconceivable/ (accessed 12 January 2012).
11. Pielke, Roger A., Jr. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Ravetz, Jerome. 1996 [1971]. Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
13. Ravetz, Jerome. 2006. The No-Nonsense Guide to Science. Oxford: New Internationalist.
14. Ravetz, Jerome. 2008. Faith and Reason in the Mathematics of the Credit Crunch. The Oxford Magazine, 8th week (Michaelmas term): 14-16.
15. Ravetz, Jerome. 2011. 'Climategate' and the Maturing of Post-Normal Science. Futures 43 (2): 149-157.
16. Risbey, James S., and Milind Kandlikar. 2007. Expressions of Likelihood and Confidence in the IPCC Uncertainty Assessment Process. Climatic Change 85 (2): 19-31.
17. Risbey, James S., and Terence J. O'Kane. 2011. Sources of Knowledge and Ignorance in Climate Research. Climatic Change 108 (4): 755-773.
18. Skywalker, Lucy. 2011. Curious Anomalies in Climate Science. Green World Trust. 15 February. http://www.greenworldtrust.org.uk/Science/Curious.htm (accessed 12 January 2012).
19. Turnpenny, John, Mavis Jones, and Irene Lorenzoni. 2011. Where Now for Post-Normal Science? A Critical Review of Its Development, Definitions, and Uses. Science, Technology, and Human Values 36 (3): 287-306.
20. von Storch, Hans, and Nico Stehr. 2010. Climate and Society: Climate as Resource and Climate as Risk. Singapore: World Scientific.