Does initial performance variability predict dual-task optimization with practice in younger and older adults?

Experimental Aging Research

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 57-88

  Strobach, Tilo ^a   Gerstorf, Denis ^a   Maquestiaux, François ^b,c   Schubert, Torsten ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84918774808     PISSN: 0361073X     EISSN: 10964657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2015.978210     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Ahissar, M., Laiwand, R., & Hochstein, S. (2001). Attentional demands following perceptual skill training. Psychological Science, 12, 56-62.
2. Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Elicker, J. D., & Lien, M. (2009). Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally. Experimental Aging Research, 35, 369-399.
3. Anderson, J. R., Taatgen, N. A., & Byrne, M. D. (2005). Learning to achieve perfect time sharing: Architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, & Ivry (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 749-761.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Baltes, P. B., & Kliegl, R. (1992). Further testing of limits of cognitive plasticity: Negative age differences in a mnemonic skill are robust. Developmental Psychology, 28, 121-125.
6. Baron, A., & Mattila, W. R. (1989). Response slowing of older adults: Effects of timelimit contingencies on single- and dual-task performances. Psychology and Aging, 4, 66-72.
7. Beringer, J. (2000). Experimental Runtime System [computer software]. Frankfurt am Main: Beri Soft Cooperation (1987-2000).
8. Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2005). Training effects on dual-task performance: Are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Psychology and Aging, 20, 695-709.
9. Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2006). Testing the limits of cognitive plasticity in older adults: Application to attentional control. Acta Psychologica, 123, 261-278.
10. Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2008). Transfer effects in task-set cost and dual-task cost after dual-task training in older and younger adults: Further evidence for cognitive plasticity in attentional control in late adulthood. Experimental Aging Research, 34, 188-209.
11. Brehmer, Y., Li, S., Müller, V., von Oertzen, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2007). Memory plasticity across the life span: Uncovering children's latent potential. Developmental Psychology, 43, 465-478.
12. Coyle, T. R. (2003). A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses. Intelligence, 31, 567-587.
13. Crossley, M., Hiscock, M., & Foreman, J. (2004). Dual-task performance in early stage dementia: Differential effects for automatized and effortful processing. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 332-346.
14. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 965-980.
15. De Jong, R. (1995). The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48A, 2-25.
16. Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777-799.
17. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini Mental State"- A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
18. Fuentes, K., Hunter, M. A., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2001). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 210-227.
19. Garrett, D. D., MacDonald, S. W. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (2012). Intraindividual reaction time variability is malleable: Feedback- and education-related reductions in variability with age. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00101/full.
20. Glass, J. M., Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Zubriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2000). Aging and the psychological refractory period: Task-coordination strategies in young and old adults. Psychology and Aging, 15, 571-595.
21. Göthe, K., Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2007). Age differences in dual-task performance after practice. Psychology and Aging, 22, 596-606.
22. Hale, S., Myerson, J., Smith, G. A., & Poon, L.W. (1988). Age, variability, and speed: Between-subjects diversity. Psychology and Aging, 3, 407-410.
23. Hartley, A. A., Maquestiaux, F., & Silverman Butts, N. (2011). A demonstration of dual-task performance without interference in some older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 181-187.
24. Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 527-545.
25. Hirst, W., Spelke, E. S., Reaves, C. C., Caharack, G., & Neisser, U. (1980). Dividing attention without alteration or automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 98-117.
26. Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. S., Hunter, M. A., Levy-Bencheton, J., & Strauss, E. (2000). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: Comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 14, 588-598.
27. Inasaridze, K., Foley, J. A., Logie, R. H., & Della Sala, S. (2009). Dual task impairments in vascular dementia. Behavioural Neurology, 22, 45-52.
28. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Kamienkowski, J. E., Pashler, H., Dehaene, S., & Sigman, M. (2011). Effects of practice on task architecture: Combined evidence from interference experiments and random-walk models of decision making. Cognition, 119, 81-95.
30. Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1995). Training for attentional control in dual task settings: A comparison of young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 50-76.
31. Li, S., Aggen, S. H., Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). Short-term fluctuations in elderly people's sensorimotor functioning predict text and spatial memory performance: The MacArthur Successful Aging Studies. Gerontology, 47, 100-116.
32. Li, S., Brehmer, Y., Shing, Y., Werkle-Bergner, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2006). Neuromodulation of associative and organizational plasticity across the life span: Empirical evidence and neurocomputational modeling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 775-790.
33. Li, S., Huxhold, O., & Schmiedek, F. (2004). Aging and attenuated processing robustness: Evidence from cognitive and sensorimotor functioning. Gerontology, 50, 28-34.
34. Li, S., Lindenberger, U., & Sikstrom, S. (2001). Aging cognition: From neuromodulation to representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 479-486.
35. Liepelt, R., Strobach, T., Frensch, P., & Schubert, T. (2011). Improved intertask coordination skills after extensive dual-task practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1251-1272.
36. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
37. Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 659-676.
38. Lövdén, M., Li, S., Shing, Y., & Lindenberger, U. (2007). Within-person trial-totrial variability precedes and predicts cognitive decline in old and very old age: Longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2827-2838.
39. MacDonald, S. S., Hultsch, D. F., & Dixon, R. A. (2003). Performance variability is related to change in cognition: Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Psychology and Aging, 18, 510-523.
40. Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome agerelated differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19, 649-667.
41. Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., & Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1262-1282.
42. Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., Hartley, A. A., & Bherer, L. (2010). Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: Declining automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 25, 177-192.
43. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
44. Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., ⋯, Shoda, Y. (2011). 'Willpower' over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252-256.
45. Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8-14.
46. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex 'frontal lobe' tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
47. Morse, C. K. (1993). Does variability increase with age? An archival study of cognitive measures. Psychology and Aging, 8, 156-164.
48. Myerson, J., Robertson, S., & Hale, S. (2007). Aging and intraindividual variability in performance: Analyses of response time distributions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 319-337.
49. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and woof of the developmental fabric. In R. Downs, L. Liben, & D. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of development, the environment, and aesthetics: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Ode, S., Robinson, M. D., & Hanson, D. M. (2011). Cognitive-emotional dysfunction among noisy minds: Predictions from individual differences in reaction time variability. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 307-327.
51. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 102-107.
52. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
53. Rabbitt, P. A. (2000). Measurement indices, functional characteristics, and psychometric constructs in cognitive aging. In T. J. Perfect & E. A. Maylor (Eds.), Models of cognitive aging (pp. 160-187). New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Rabbitt, P. A., Osman, P., Moore, B., & Stollery, R. (2001). There are stable individual differences in performance variability, both from moment to moment and from day to day. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A, 981-1003.
55. Ram, N., Conroy, D. E., Pincus, A. L., Hyde, A. L., & Molloy, L. E. (2012). Tethering theory to method: Using measures of intraindividual variability to operationalize individuals' dynamic characteristics. In G. Hancock & J. Harring (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal modeling in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 81-110). New York: Information Age.
56. Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778-791.
57. Ram, N., Rabbitt, P., Stollery, B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2005). Cognitive performance inconsistency: Intraindividual change and variability. Psychology and Aging, 20, 623-633.
58. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. V. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3-21.
59. Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or simply stage-shortening? Psychological Research, 70, 125-142.
60. Salthouse, T. A. (1993). Attentional blocks are not responsible for age-related slowing. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 263-270.
61. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414-429.
62. Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reaction affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 408-425.
63. Schubert, T. (2008). The central attentional limitation and executive control. Frontiers of Bioscience, 13, 3569-3580.
64. Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101-108.
65. Shammi, P., Bosman, E., & Stuss, D. T. (1998). Aging and variability in performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5, 1-13.
66. Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Dynamics of the central bottleneck: Dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology, 4, e220.
67. Slifkin, A. B., & Newell, K. M. (1998). Is variability in human performance a reflection of system noise? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 170-177.
68. Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461-479.
69. Strauss, E., MacDonald, S. S., Hunter, M., Moll, A., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in three groups of older adults: Cross-domain links to physical status and self-perceived affect and beliefs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 893-906.
70. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Müller, H., & Schubert, T. (2012a). Age- and practicerelated influences on dual-task costs and compensation mechanisms under optimal conditions for dual-task performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 222-247.
71. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Müller, H., & Schubert, T. (2012b). Testing the limits of optimizing dual-task performance in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6:39.
72. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (2008). The temporal stability of skilled dual-task performance. In H. D. Zimmer, C. Frings, A. Mecklinger, B. Opitz, M. Pospeschill, & D. Wentura (Eds.), Cognitive Science 2007. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society of Germany, Saarbrücken, Germany.
73. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Soutschek, A., & Schubert, T. (2012c). Investigation on the improvement and transfer of dual-task coordination skills. Psychological Research, 76, 794-811.
74. Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Pashler, H., Frensch, P., & Schubert, T. (2013). Effects of extensive dual-task practice on processing stages in simultaneous choice tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 900-920.
75. Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Schubert, T., & Kiesel, A. (2012d). Task switching: Effects of practice on switch and mixing costs. Psychological Research, 76, 74-83.
76. Stuss, D. T., Murphy, K. J., Binns, M. A., & Alexander, M. P. (2003). Staying on the job: The frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 126, 2363-2380.
77. Szameitat, A., Lepsien, J., von Cramon, D., Sterr, A., & Schubert, T. (2006). Taskorder coordination in dual-task performance and the lateral prefrontal cortex: An event-related fMRI study. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 70, 541-552.
78. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
79. van Lersel, M. B., Kessels, R. C., Bloem, B. R., Verbeek, A. M., & Rikkert, M. (2008). Executive functions are associated with gait and balance in communityliving elderly people. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 63A, 1344-1349.
80. Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268-1283.
81. Verhaeghen, P. (2011). Aging and executive control: Reports of a demise greatly exaggerated. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 174-180.
82. Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dualtask performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443-460.
83. Welford, A. T. (1952). The psychological refractory period and the timing of high speed performance-A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
84. West, R. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272-292.
85. West, R. L. (1999). Age differences in lapses of intention in the Stroop task. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, 34-43.
86. West, R. L., Murphy, K. J., Armilio, M. L., Craik, F. M., & Stuss, D. T. (2002). Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control. Brain and Cognition, 49, 402-419.
87. Williams, B. R., Hultsch, D. F., Strauss, E. H., Hunter, M. A., & Tannock, R. (2005). Inconsistency in Reaction Time Across the Life Span. Neuropsychology, 19, 88-96.