Testing the limits of optimizing dual-task performance in younger and older adults

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue MARCH 2012, 2012, Pages 1-12

  Strobach, Tilo ^a   Frensch, Peter ^b   Müller, Herrmann Josef ^a   Schubert, Torsten ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive aging; Dual task performance; Practice; Testing the limits

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84859183563     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00039     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Elicker, J. D., and Lien, M. (2009). Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally. Exp. Aging Res. 35, 369-399.
2. Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Vires-Collins, H., and Sperry, S. (1998). The psychological refractory period: evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing. Psychol. Aging 13, 218-229.
3. Anger, H., Hylla, E., Horn, H., Schwarz, E., Raatz, U., and Bargmann, R. (1968). Wortschatztest WST 7-8. Begabungstest für 7. und 8. Klassen. Weinheim: Verlag Julius Beltz.
4. Baltes, P. B., and Kliegl, R. (1992). Further testing of limits of cognitive plasticity: negative age differences in a mnemonic skill are robust. Dev. Psychol. 28, 121-125.
5. Beringer, J. (2000). Experimental Runtime System. Frankfurt am Main: BeriSoft Cooperation.
6. Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., and Becic, E. (2005). Training effects on dual-task performance: are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Psychol. Aging 20, 695-709.
7. Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., and Becic, E. (2006). Testing the limits of cognitive plasticity in older adults: application to attentional control. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 123, 261-278.
8. Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., and Becic, E. (2008). Transfer effects in task-set cost and dual-task cost after dual-task training in older and younger adults: further evidence for cognitive plasticity in attentional control in late adulthood. Exp. Aging Res. 34, 188-209.
9. Brickenkamp, R., and Zillmer, E. (1998). The d2 Test of Attention. (1st US Edn.). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
10. Buschkuehl, M., Jaeggi, S. M., Hutchison, S., Perrig-Chiello, P., Däpp, C., Müller, M., and Perrig, W. J. (2008). Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults. Psychol. Aging 23, 743-753.
11. Cavanaugh, J. C., and Blanchard-Fields, F. (2006). Adult Development and Aging, 5th Edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing/Thomson Learning.
12. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., and McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini mental state" - a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189-198.
13. Frith, C. D., and Done, D. (1986). Routes to action in reaction time tasks. Psychol. Res. 48, 169-177.
14. Glass, J. M., Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., and Meyer, D. E. (2000). Aging and the psychological refractory period: task-coordination strategies in young and old adults. Psychol. Aging 15, 571-595.
15. Göthe, K., Oberauer, K., and Kliegl, R. (2007). Age differences in dual-task performance after practice. Psychol. Aging 22, 596-606.
16. Guttentag, R. E. (1989). Age differences in dual-task performance: procedures, assumptions, and results. Dev. Rev. 9, 146-170.
17. Hartley, A. A. (2001). Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes. Psychol. Aging 16, 47-54.
18. Hartley, A. A., and Little, D. M. (1999). Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128, 417-450.
19. Hartley, A. A., Maquestiaux, F., and Silverman Butts, N. (2011). A demonstration of dual-task performance without interference in some older adults. Psychol. Aging 26, 181-187.
20. Hazeltine, E., Teague, D., and Ivry, R. B. (2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 527-545.
21. Hein, G., and Schubert, T. (2004). Aging and input processing in dual-task situations. Psychol. Aging 19, 416-432.
22. Hirst, W., Spelke, E. S., Reaves, C. C., Caharack, G., and Neisser, U. (1980). Dividing attention without alteration or automaticity. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 109, 98-117.
23. Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., and Strayer, D. L. (1995). Training for attentional control in dual task settings: a comparison of young and old adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 1, 50-76.
24. Kramer, A. F., and Willis, S. L. (2003). "Cognitive plasticity and aging," in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 43, eds B. H. Ross and B. H. Ross (New York: Elsevier Science), 267-302.
25. Kray, J., and Lindenberger, U. (2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychol. Aging 15, 126-147.
26. Liepelt, R., Strobach, T., Frensch, P., and Schubert, T. (2011). Improved inter-task coordination skills after extensive dual-task practice. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 1251-1272.
27. Lindenberger, U., and Baltes, P. B. (1995). Testing-the-limits and experimental simulation: two methods to explicate the role of learning in development. Hum. Dev. 38, 349-360.
28. Lindenberger, U., Kliegl, R., and Baltes, P. B. (1992). Professional expertise does not eliminate age differences in imagery-based memory performance during adulthood. Psychol. Aging 7, 585-593.
29. Logan, G. D., and Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychol. Rev. 108, 393-434.
30. Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., and Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychol. Aging 19, 649-667.
31. Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., and Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Mem. Cognit. 36, 1262-1282.
32. Maquestiaux, F., Laguë-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., Hartley, A. A., and Bherer, L. (2010). Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age. Psychol. Aging 25, 177-192.
33. McDowd, J. M., and Shaw, R. J. (2000). "Attention and aging: a functional perspective," in The Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 2nd Edn, eds F. M. Craik, T. A. Salthouse, F. M. Craik, and T. A. Salthouse (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers), 221-292.
34. Meyer, D. E., and Kieras, D. E. (1999). "Précis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance," in Attention and Performance XVII: Cognitive Regulation of Performance: Interaction of Theory and Application, eds D. Gopher, A. Koriat, D. Gopher, and A. Koriat (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), 17-88.
35. Nyberg, L., Marklund, P., Persson, J., Cabeza, R., Forkstam, C., Petersson, K., and Ingvar, M. (2003). Common prefrontal activations during working memory, episodic memory, and semantic memory. Neuropsychologia 41, 371-377.
36. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 102-107.
37. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol. Bull. 116, 220-244.
38. Raz, N. (2000). "Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: integration of structural and functional findings," in The Handbook of Aging and Cognition, eds F. I. M. Craik and T. A. Salthouse (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 1-90.
39. Riby, L. M., Perfect, T. J., and Stollery, B. T. (2004). The effects of age and task domain on dual task performance: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 16, 868-891.
40. Rogers, R. D., and Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 124, 207-231.
41. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., and Van Selst, M. V. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 3-21.
42. Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M. V., Whitsell, S., and Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29, 280-289.
43. Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., and Remington, R. W. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or simply stage-shortening? Psychol. Res. 70, 125-142.
44. Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reaction affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 408-425.
45. Schubert, T. (2008). The central attentional limitation and executive control. Front. Bisoci. 13, 3569-3580.
46. Schumacher, E. H., Seymour, T. L., Glass, J. M., Fencsik, D. E., Lauber, E. J., Kieras, D. E., and Meyer, D. E. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychol. Sci. 12, 101-108.
47. Sigman, M., and Dehaene, S. (2006). Dynamics of the central bottleneck: dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biol. 4, e220. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040220
48. Somberg, B. L., and Salthouse, T. A. (1982). Divided attention abilities in young and old adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8, 651-663.
49. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., and Schubert, T. (2008). "The temporal stability of skilled dual-task performance," in Cognitive Science 2007. Saarbrücken: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society of Germany, eds H. D. Zimmer, C. Frings, A. Mecklinger, B. Opitz, M. Pospeschill, and D. Wentura.
50. Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Schubert, T., and Kiesel, A. (2012a). Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs. Psychol. Res. 76, 74-83.
51. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Müller, H., and Schubert, T. (2012b). Age- and practice-related influences on dual-task costs and compensation mechanisms under optimal conditions for dual-task performance. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 19, 222-247.
52. Strobach, T., Frensch, P. A., Soutschek, A., and Schubert, T. (in press). Investigation on the improvement and transfer of dual-task coordination skills. Psychol. Res.
53. Tombu, M., and Jolicoeur, P. (2004). Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30, 795-810.
54. Van Selst, M., and Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Decision and response in dual-task interference. Cogn. Psychol. 33, 266-307.
55. Van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., and Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25, 1268-1283.
56. Verhaeghen, P. (2011). Aging and executive control: reports of a demise greatly exaggerated. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 174-180.
57. Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., and Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 18, 443-460.
58. Weiß, R. H. (2006). CFT 20-R: Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 - Revision. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
59. West, R. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol. Bull. 120, 272-292.