Learning to Bypass the Central Bottleneck: Declining Automaticity With Advancing Age

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 177-192

  Maquestiaux, François ^a   Laguë Beauvais, Maude ^b,c   Ruthruff, Eric ^d   Hartley, Alan ^e   Bherer, Louis ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^e SCRIPPS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatization; Cognitive aging; Dual task interference; Practice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL TASK; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOCALIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; APTITUDE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AUTOMATISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; STROOP TEST; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950262256     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017122     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allen P.A., Lien M.-C., Murphy M.D., Sanders R.E., Judge K.S., McCann R.S. Age differences in overlapping-task performance: Evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults. Psychology and Aging 2002, 17:505-519.
2. Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Elicker, J. D., & Lien, M. -C. (in press). Multi-session, dual-task PRP practice benefits older and younger adults equally. Experimental Aging Research.
3. Allen P.A., Ruthruff E., Lien M.-C. Attention. Encyclopedia of gerontology 2007, 120-129. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2nd ed. J.E. Birren (Ed.).
4. Allen P.A., Smith A.F., Vires-Collins H., Sperry S. The psychological refractory period: Evidence for attentional differences in time-sharing. Psychology and Aging 1998, 13:218-229.
5. Anderson J.R., Taatgen N.A., Byrne M.D. Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: Architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:749-761.
6. Baron A., Mattila W.R. Response slowing of older adults: Effects of time-limit contingencies on single- and dual-task performances. Psychology and Aging 1989, 4:66-72.
7. Bherer L., Kramer A.F., Peterson M.S., Colcombe S., Erickson K., Becic E. Training effects on dual-task performance: Are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control?. Psychology and Aging 2005, 20:695-709.
8. Bherer L., Kramer A.F., Peterson M.S., Colcombe S., Erickson K., Becic E. Transfer effects in task-set cost and dual-task cost after dual-task training in older and younger adults: Further evidence for cognitive plasticity in attentional control in late adulthood. Experimental Aging Research 2008, 34:188-219.
9. Bohnen N., Jolles J., Twijnstra A. Modification of the Stroop Color Word Test improves differentiation between patients with mild head injury and matched controls. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1992, 6:178-184.
10. Byrne M.D., Anderson J.R. Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review 2001, 108:847-869.
11. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. "Mini-Mental State": A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinical. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975, 12:189-198.
12. Göthe K., Oberauer K., Kliegl R. Age differences in dual-task performance after practice. Psychology and Aging 2007, 3:596-606.
13. Glass J.M., Schumacher E.H., Lauber E.J., Zurbriggen E.L., Gmeindl L., Kieras D.E., Meyer D.E. Aging and the psychological refractory period: Task-coordination strategies in young and old adults. Psychology and Aging 2000, 15:571-595.
14. Greenwood P., Parasuraman R. Effects of aging on the speed and attentional cost of cognitive operations. Developmental Neuropsychology 1991, 7:421-434.
15. Hartley A.A. Attention. The handbook of aging and cognition 1992, 3-49. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. F.I.M. Craik, T.A. Salthouse (Eds.).
16. Hartley A.A. Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response generation processes. Psychology and Aging 2001, 16:47-54.
17. Hartley A.A., Little D.M. Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1999, 128:417-450.
18. Hartley A.A., Maquestiaux F. Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 2007, 22:215-222.
19. Hazeltine E., Ruthruff E., Remington R.W. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52:291-345.
20. Hazeltine E., Teague D., Ivry B. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:527-545.
21. Hein G., Schubert T. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:416-432.
22. Kramer A.F., Larish J., Strayer D.L. Training for attentional control in dual-task settings: A comparison of young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1995, 1:50-76.
23. Lien M.-C., Allen P.A., Ruthruff E., Grabbe J., McCann R.S., Remington R.W. Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging 2006, 21:431-447.
24. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:212-238.
25. Lien M.-C., Ruthruff E., Johnston J.C. Attentional limitations in doing two things at once: The search for exceptions. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15:89-93.
26. Maquestiaux F., Hartley A.A., Bertsch J. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:649-667.
27. Maquestiaux F., Laguë-Beauvais M., Ruthruff E., Bherer L. Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:1262-1282.
28. McDowd J.M. The effects of age and extended practice on divided attention performance. Journal of Gerontology 1986, 41:764-769.
29. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
30. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 1997, 104:749-791.
31. Miller J.O., Ulrich R. Bimanual response grouping in dual-task paradigms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 24:999-1019.
32. Miller J.O., Ulrich R., Rolke B. On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 58:273-310.
33. Navon D., Miller J. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 44:193-251.
34. Pashler H. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:330-342.
35. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:220-244.
36. Pashler H., Johnston J.C. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1989, 41A:19-45.
37. Reitan R.M., Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation 1985, Neuropsychology Press, Tucson, AZ.
38. Rogers W.A., Bertus E.L., Gilbert D.K. Dual-task assessment of age differences in automatic process development. Psychology and Aging 1994, 9:398-413.
39. Ruthruff E., Hazeltine E., Remington R.W. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?. Psychological Research 2006, 70:494-503.
40. Ruthruff E., Johnston J.C., Van Selst M. Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:3-21.
41. Ruthruff E., Johnston J.C., Van Selst M., Whitsell S., Remington R. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:280-289.
42. Ruthruff E., Pashler H., Hazeltine E. Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity-sharing or central postponement?. Perception and Psychophysics 2003, 65:801-816.
43. Ruthruff E., Van Selst M., Johnston J.C., Remington R.W. How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?. Psychological Research 2006, 70:125-142.
44. Salthouse T.A., Somberg B.L. Skilled performance: Effects of adult age and experience on elementary processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1982, 2:176-207.
45. Schumacher E.H., Seymour T.L., Glass J.M., Fencsik D.E., Lauber E.J., Kieras D.E., Meyer D.E. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science 2001, 12:101-108.
46. Sit R.A., Fisk A.D. Age-related performance in a multiple-task environment. Human Factors 1999, 41:26-34.
47. Spring O., Benton A.L. Neurosensory Center for Comprehensive Examination of Aphasia (NCCEA 1997, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. Rev. ed.
48. Tombu M., Jolicoeur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:3-18.
49. Touron D.R., Hertzog C. Distinguishing age differences in knowledge, strategy use, and confidence during strategic skill acquisition. Psychology and Aging 2004, 19:452-466.
50. Van Selst M., Ruthruff E., Johnston J.C. Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1268-1283.
51. Verhaeghen P., Steitz D.W., Sliwinski M.J., Cerella J. Aging and dual task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging 2003, 18:443-460.
52. Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised 1981, Psychological Corp, New York.
53. Welford A.T. The " psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.