Molecular dissection of segment formation in the developing hindbrain

Development (Cambridge)

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 185-195

  Labalette, Charlotte ^a,c   Wassef, Michel Adam ^a,b,d   Desmarquet Trin Dinh, Carole ^a   Bouchoucha, Yassine Xavier ^a,b   Le Men, Johan ^a,b,e   Charnay, Patrick ^a   Gilardi Hebenstreit, Pascale ^a  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^d INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^e INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Egr2; Fgf; Hox; Krox20; Nlz; Rhombomere; Segmentation; Transcriptional enhancer; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

CIS ACTING ELEMENT; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; HOX PROTEIN; PROTEIN NLZ; PROTEIN PG1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZEBRAFISH PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENHANCER REGION; GENE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; KROX20 GENE; NEUROMERE; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EMBRYOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MORPHOGENESIS;

DANIO RERIO;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; ENHANCER ELEMENTS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ZEBRAFISH; ZEBRAFISH PROTEINS;

EID: 84918557453     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: 14779129     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.109652     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aragon, F. and Pujades, C. (2009). FGF signaling controls caudal hindbrain specification through Ras-ERK1/2 pathway. BMC Dev. Biol. 9, 61.
2. Barrow, J.R., Stadler, H. S. and Capecchi, M. R. (2000). Roles of Hoxa1 and Hoxa2 in patterning the early hindbrain of the mouse. Development 127, 933-944.
3. Berg, J. M. (1992). Sp1 and the subfamily of zinc finger proteins with guanine-rich binding sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 11109-11110.
4. Bouchoucha, Y. X., Reingruber, J., Labalette, C., Wassef, M. A., Thierion, E., Desmarquet-Trin Dinh, C., Holcman, D., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. and Charnay, P. (2013). Dissection of a Krox20 positive feedback loop driving cell fate choices in hindbrain patterning. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 690.
5. Chomette, D., Frain, M., Cereghini, S., Charnay, P. and Ghislain, J. (2006). Krox20 hindbrain cis-regulatory landscape: interplay between multiple long-range initiation and autoregulatory elements. Development 133, 1253-1262.
6. Cooke, J. E., Kemp, H. A. and Moens, C. B. (2005). EphA4 is required for cell adhesion and rhombomere-boundary formation in the zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 15, 536-542.
7. Davenne, M., Maconochie, M. K., Neun, R., Pattyn, A., Chambon, P., Krumlauf, A. and Rijli, F. M. (1999). Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 control dorsoventral patterns of neuronal development in the rostral hindbrain. Neuron 22, 677-691.
8. de Laat, W. and Duboule, D. (2013). Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature 502, 499-506.
9. Furthauer, M., Reifers, F., Brand, M., Thisse, B. and Thisse, C. (2001). sprouty4 acts in vivo as a feedback-induced antagonist of FGF signaling in zebrafish. Development 128, 2175-2186.
10. Fürthauer, M., Van Celst, J., Thisse, C. and Thisse, B. (2004). Fgf signalling controls the dorsoventral patterning of the zebrafish embryo. Development 131, 2853-2864.
11. Garcia-Dominguez, M, Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. and Charnay, P. (2006). PIASxbeta acts as an activator of Hoxb1 and is antagonized by Krox20 during hindbrain segmentation. EMBO J. 25, 2432-2442.
12. Gavalas, A., Studer, M., Lumsden, A., Rijli, F. M., Krumlauf, R. and Chambon, P. (1998). Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch. Development 125, 1123-1136.
13. Gilland, E. and Baker, R. (1993). Conservation of neuroepithelial and mesodermal segments in the embryonic vertebrate head. Acta Anat. (Basel) 148, 110-123.
14. Giudicelli, F., Taillebourg, E., Charnay, P. and Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. (2001). Krox-20 patterns the hindbrain through both cell-autonomous and non cellautonomous mechanisms. Genes Dev. 15, 567-580.
15. Halloran, M. C., Sato-Maeda, M., Warren, J. T., Su, F., Lele, Z., Krone, P. H., Kuwada, J. Y. and Shoji, W. (2000). Laser-induced gene expression in specific cells of transgenic zebrafish. Development 127, 1953-1960.
16. Harrison, S. M., Houzelstein, D., Dunwoodie, S. L. and Beddington, R. S. P. (2000). Sp5, a new member of the Sp1 family, is dynamically expressed during development and genetically interacts with Brachyury. Dev. Biol. 227, 358-372.
17. Hauptmann, G. and Gerster, T. (1994). Two-color whole-mount in situ hybridization to vertebrate and Drosophila embryos. Trends Genet. 10, 266.
18. Helmbacher, F., Pujades, C., Desmarquet, C., Frain, M., Rijli, F. M., Chambon, P. and Charnay, P. (1998). Hoxa1 and Krox-20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3. Development 125, 4739-4748.
19. Hoyle, J., Tang, Y. P., Wiellette, E. L., Wardle, F. C. and Sive, H. (2004). nlz gene family is required for hindbrain patterning in the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 229, 835-846.
20. Kawakami, K., Takeda, H., Kawakami, N., Kobayashi, M., Matsuda, N. and Mishina, M. (2004). A transposon-mediated gene trap approach identifies developmentally regulated genes in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 7, 133-144.
21. Kicheva, A., Cohen, M. and Briscoe, J. (2012). Developmental pattern formation: insights from physics and biology. Science 338, 210-212.
22. Krauss, S., Johansen, T., Korzh, V. and Fjose, A. (1991). Expression of the zebrafish paired box gene pax[zf-b] during early neurogenesis. Development 113, 1193-1206.
23. Labalette, C., Bouchoucha, Y. X., Wassef, M. A., Gongal, P. A., Le Men, J., Becker, T., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. and Charnay, P. (2011). Hindbrain patterning requires fine-tuning of early krox20 transcription by Sprouty 4. Development 138, 317-326.
24. Lander, A. D. (2011). Pattern, growth, and control. Cell 144, 955-969.
25. Lumsden, A. (1990). The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci. 13, 329-335.
26. Lumsden, A. and Keynes, R. (1989). Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature 337, 424-428.
27. Lumsden, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1996). Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science 274, 1109-1115.
28. Makki, N. and Capecchi, M. R. (2010). Hoxa1 lineage tracing indicates a direct role for Hoxa1 in the development of the inner ear, the heart, and the third rhombomere. Dev. Biol. 341, 499-509.
29. Mangan, S. and Alon, U. (2003). Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 11980-11985.
30. Marin, F. and Charnay, P. (2000). Hindbrain patterning: FGFs regulate Krox20 and mafB/kr expression in the otic/preotic region. Development 127, 4925-4935.
31. Maves, L., Jackman, W. and Kimmel, C. B. (2002). FGF3 and FGF8 mediate a rhombomere 4 signaling activity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 129, 3825-3837.
32. McClintock, J. M., Carlson, R., Mann, D. M. and Prince, V. E. (2001). Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes. Development 128, 2471-2484.
33. McClintock, J. M., Kheirbek, M. A. and Prince, V. E. (2002). Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate gene retention. Development 129, 2339-2354.
34. McKay, I. J., Lewis, J. and Lumsden, A. (1996). The role of FGF-3 in early inner ear development: an analysis in normal and kreisler mutant mice. Dev. Biol. 174, 370-378.
35. McNulty, C. L., Peres, J. N., Bardine, N., van den Akker, W. M. R. and Durston, A. J. (2005). Knockdown of the complete Hox paralogous group 1 leads to dramatic hindbrain and neural crest defects. Development 132, 2861-2871.
36. Meinhardt, H. (2009). Models for the generation and interpretation of gradients. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a001362.
37. Mellitzer, G., Xu, Q. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1999). Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 400, 77-81.
38. Moens, C. B. and Prince, V. E. (2002). Constructing the hindbrain: insights from the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 224, 1-17.
39. Moens, C. B., Cordes, S. P., Giorgianni, M. W., Barsh, G. S. and Kimmel, C. B. (1998). Equivalence in the genetic control of hindbrain segmentation in fish and mouse. Development 125, 381-391.
40. Monk, K. R., Naylor, S. G., Glenn, T. D., Mercurio, S., Perlin, J. R., Dominguez, C., Moens, C. B. and Talbot, W. S. (2009). A G protein-coupled receptor is essential for Schwann cells to initiate myelination. Science 325, 1402-1405.
41. Nakamura, M., Choe, S.-K., Runko, A. P., Gardner, P. D. and Sagerström, C. G. (2008). Nlz1/Znf703 acts as a repressor of transcription. BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 108.
42. Niederreither, K., Vermot, J., Schuhbaur, B., Chambon, P. and Dolle, P.(2000). Retinoic acid synthesis and hindbrain patterning in the mouse embryo. Development 127, 75-85.
43. Oxtoby, E. and Jowett, T. (1993). Cloning of the zebrafish krox-20 gene (krx-20) and its expression during hindbrain development. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 1087-1095.
44. Prince, V. E., Moens, C. B., Kimmel, C. B. and Ho, R. K. (1998). Zebrafish hox genes: expression in the hindbrain region of wild-type and mutants of the segmentation gene, valentino. Development 125, 393-406.
45. Rossel, M. and Capecchi, M. R. (1999). Mice mutant for both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 show extensive remodeling of the hindbrain and defects in craniofacial development. Development 126, 5027-5040.
46. Runko, A. P. and Sagerström, C. G. (2003). Nlz belongs to a family of zinc-fingercontaining repressors and controls segmental gene expression in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev. Biol. 262, 254-267.
47. Runko, A. P. and Sagerström, C. G. (2004). Isolation of nlz2 and characterization of essential domains in Nlz family proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 11917-11925.
48. Schneider-Maunoury, S, Topilko, P., Seitanidou, T., Levi, G., Cohen-Tannoudji, M., Pournin, S., Babinet, C. and Charnay, P. (1993). Disruption of Krox-20 results in alteration of rhombomeres 3 and 5 in the developing hindbrain. Cell 75, 1199-1214.
49. Schneider-Maunoury, S, Seitanidou, T., Charnay, P. and Lumsden, A. (1997). Segmental and neuronal architecture of the hindbrain of Krox-20 mouse mutants. Development 124, 1215-1226.
50. Schulte-Merker, S, Hammerschmidt, M., Beuchle, D., Cho, K. W., De Robertis, E. M. and Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1994). Expression of zebrafish goosecoid and no tail gene products in wild-type and mutant no tail embryos. Development 120, 843-852.
51. Shen, Y., Yue, F., McCleary, D. F., Ye, Z., Edsall, L., Kuan, S., Wagner, U., Dixon, J., Lee, L., Lobanenkov, V. V. et al. (2012). A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116-120.
52. Spitz, F. and Furlong, E. E. M. (2012). Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 613-626.
53. Stedman, A., Lecaudey, V., Havis, E., Anselme, I., Wassef, M., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. and Schneider-Maunoury, S. (2009). A functional interaction between Irx and Meis patterns the anterior hindbrain and activates krox20 expression in rhombomere 3. Dev. Biol. 327, 566-577.
54. Studer, M., Pöpperl, H., Marshall, H., Kuroiwa, A. and Krumlauf, R. (1994). Role of a conserved retinoic acid response element in rhombomere restriction of Hoxb-1. Science 265, 1728-1732.
55. Sun, Z., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y. and Meng, A. (2006). Sp5l is a mediator of Fgf signals in anteroposterior patterning of the neuroectoderm in zebrafish embryo. Dev. Dyn. 235, 2999-3006.
56. Swiatek, P. J. and Gridley, T. (1993). Perinatal lethality and defects in hindbrain development in mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of the zinc finger gene Krox20. Genes Dev. 7, 2071-2084.
57. Tallafuss, A., Wilm, T. P., Crozatier, M., Pfeffer, P., Wassef, M. and Bally-Cuif, L. (2001). The zebrafish buttonhead-like factor Bts1 is an early regulator of pax2.1 expression during mid-hindbrain development. Development 128, 4021-4034.
58. Tümpel, S., Wiedemann, L. M. and Krumlauf, R. (2009). Hox genes and segmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 88, 103-137.
59. Voiculescu, O., Taillebourg, E., Pujades, C., Kress, C., Buart, S., Charnay, P. and Schneider-Maunoury, S. (2001). Hindbrain patterning: Krox20 couples segmentation and specification of regional identity. Development 128, 4967-4978.
60. Walshe, J., Maroon, H., McGonnell, I. M., Dickson, C. and Mason, I. (2002). Establishment of hindbrain segmental identity requires signaling by FGF3 and FGF8. Curr. Biol. 12, 1117-1123.
61. Wassef, M. A., Chomette, D., Pouilhe, M., Stedman, A., Havis, E., Desmarquet-Trin Dinh, C., Schneider-Maunoury, S., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P., Charnay, P. and Ghislain, J. (2008). Rostral hindbrain patterning involves the direct activation of a Krox20 transcriptional enhancer by Hox/Pbx and Meis factors. Development 135, 3369-3378.
62. Weidinger, G., Thorpe, C. J., Wuennenberg-Stapleton, K., Ngai, J. and Moon, R. T. (2005). The Sp1-related transcription factors sp5 and sp5-like act downstream of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesoderm and neuroectoderm patterning. Curr. Biol. 15, 489-500.
63. Wiellette, E. L. and Sive, H. (2003). vhnf1 and Fgf signals synergize to specify rhombomere identity in the zebrafish hindbrain. Development 130, 3821-3829.
64. Zhang, L., Radtke, K., Zheng, L., Cai, A. Q., Schilling, T. F. and Nie, Q. (2012). Noise drives sharpening of gene expression boundaries in the zebrafish hindbrain. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 613.