A methodological paradigm for patient-specific multi-scale CFD simulations: From clinical measurements to parameter estimates for individual analysis

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1614-1648

  Pant, S ^a,b   Fabreges B ^a,b   Gerbeau, J F ^a,b   Vignon Clementel, I E ^a,b  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Lumped parameter models; Multi scale modelling; Parameter estimation; Patient specific simulations; Unscented Kalman filter

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; ITERATIVE METHODS; KALMAN FILTERS; LUMPED PARAMETER NETWORKS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CLINICAL MEASUREMENTS; ESTIMATION METHODOLOGIES; LUMPED PARAMETER MODELS; MULTI-SCALE MODELLING; PATIENT SPECIFIC; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SYNTHETIC AND REAL DATA; UNSCENTED KALMAN FILTER;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; VASCULAR DISEASE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 84918542420     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2692     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL, Feinstein JA. A primer on computational simulation in congenital heart disease for the clinician. Progress in Pediatric Cardiology 2010; 30(1):3-13.
2. Kung E, Baretta A, Baker Catriona, Arbia G, Biglino G, Corsini C, Schievano S, Vignon-Clementel IE, Dubini G, Pennati G, et al.. Predictive modeling of the virtual Hemi-Fontan operation for second stage single ventricle palliation: two patient-specific cases. Journal of Biomechanics 2013; 46(2):423-429.
3. Baretta A, Corsini C, Yang W, Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL, Feinstein JA, Hsia TY, Dubini G, Migliavacca F, Pennati G, et al.. Virtual surgeries in patients with congenital heart disease: a multi-scale modelling test case. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2011; 369(1954):4316-4330.
4. Pant S, Limbert G, Curzen NP, Bressloff NW. Multiobjective design optimisation of coronary stents. Biomaterials 2011; 32(31):7755-7773.
5. Prasad A, Xiao N, Gong XY, Zarins CK, Figueroa CA. A computational framework for investigating the positional stability of aortic endografts. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2013; 12(5):869-887.
6. Ralovich K, Itu L, Mihalef V, Sharma P, Ionasec R, Vitanovski D, Krawtschuk W, Everett A, Ringel R, Navab N, Comaniciu D, Hemodynamic Assessment of Pre- and Post-operative Aortic Coarctation from MRI. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2012, vol.7511. Ayache N, Delingette H, Golland P, Mori K (eds)., Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Nice, France, 2012; 486-493.
7. Greve JM, Les AS, Tang BT, Draney Blomme MT, Wilson NM, Dalman RL, Pelc NJ, Taylor Ca. Allometric scaling of wall shear stress from mice to humans: quantification using cine phase-contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology October 2006; 291:(4):H1700-8.
8. Vignon-Clementel IE, Alberto Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(29-32):3776-3796.
9. Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for 3D simulations of non-periodic blood flow and pressure fields in deformable arteries. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering October 2010; 13(5):625-40.
10. Formaggia L, Nobile F, Quarteroni A, Veneziani A. Multiscale modelling of the circulatory system: a preliminary analysis. Computing and Visualization in Science 1999; 2(2-3):75-83.
11. Formaggia L, Gerbeau JF, Nobile F, Quarteroni A. On the coupling of 3D and 1D Navier-Stokes equations for flow problems in compliant vessels. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 191(6):561-582.
12. Westerhof N, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof B. The arterial Windkessel. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2009; 47(2):131-141.
13. Pennati G, Corsini C, Cosentino D, Hsia TY, Luisi VS, Dubini G, Migliavacca F. Boundary conditions of patient-specific fluid dynamics modelling of cavopulmonary connections: possible adaptation of pulmonary resistances results in a critical issue for a virtual surgical planning. Interface Focus 2011; 1(3):297-307.
14. Spilker RL, Taylor CA. Tuning multidomain hemodynamic simulations to match physiological measurements. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010; 38(8):2635-48.
15. Troianowski G, Taylor CA, Feinstein JA, Vignon-Clementel IE Three-dimensional simulations in Glenn patients: clinically based boundary conditions, hemodynamic results and sensitivity to input data. Transactions of the ASME-K-Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2011; 133(11):111006.
16. Arbia G, Corsini C, Baker C, Pennati G, Hsia TY, Vignon-Clementel IE, 2014; Multiscale modeling of pulmonary hemodynamics in first stage single ventricle patients: integrating clinical data and simulations. INRIA report, Paris, France, (Available from: http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01063967) [Accessed on 4 November 2014].
17. Ismail M, Wall WA, Gee MW. Adjoint-based inverse analysis of windkessel parameters for patient-specific vascular models. Journal of Computational Physics 2012; 244:113-130.
18. Bertoglio C, Moireau P, Gerbeau JF. Sequential parameter estimation for fluid-structure problems: Application to hemodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 2012; 28(4):434-455.
19. Lassila T, Manzoni A, Quarteroni A, Rozza G. A reduced computational and geometrical framework for inverse problems in hemodynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 2013; 29(7):741-776.
20. Xiao N, Alastruey J, Alberto Figueroa C. A systematic comparison between 1-D and 3-D hemodynamics in compliant arterial models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 2014; 30(2):204-231.
21. DeVault K, Gremaud PA, Novak V, Olufsen MS, Vernieres G, Zhao P. Blood flow in the circle of Willis: modeling and calibration. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 2008; 7(2):888-909.
22. Lombardi D. Inverse problems in 1D hemodynamics on systemic networks: A sequential approach. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 2014; 30(2):160-179.
23. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK, Durrant-Whyte HF. Anew approach for filtering nonlinear systems. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 1995, 3, IEEE, 1995; 1628-1632.
24. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. Aerosense'97, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1997; 182-193.
25. Chow SM, Ferrer E, Nesselroade JR. An unscented Kalman filter approach to the estimation of nonlinear dynamical systems models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007; 42(2):283-321.
26. Wan EA, Van Der Merwe R. The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Communications, and Control Symposium 2000. AS-SPCC, IEEE, 2000; 153-158.
27. Kalman RE. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Transactions of the ASME-Journal of Basic Engineering 1960; 82(Series D):35-45.
28. Haykin, SS, et al. Kalman filtering and neural networks, Wiley Online Library: 2001.
29. Julier SJ, LaViola JJ. On {Kalman} filtering with nonlinear equality constraints. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2007; 55(6):2774-2784.
30. Wen W, Durrant-Whyte HF. Model-based multi-sensor data fusion: in IEEE, 1992; 1720-1726.
31. Tahk M, Speyer JL. Target tracking problems subject to kinematic constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1990; 35(3):324-326.
32. De Geeter J, Van Brussel H, De Schutter J, Decréton M. A smoothly constrained Kalman filter. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1997; 19(10):1171-1177.
33. Yang C, Blasch E. Kalman filtering with nonlinear state constraints. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 2009; 45(1):70-84.
34. Miao H, Xia X, Perelson AS, Wu H. On identifiability of nonlinear ODE models and applications in viral dynamics. SIAM Review 2011; 53(1):3-39.
35. Bai P, Banks HT, Dediu S, Govan AY, Last M, Lloyd AL, Nguyen HK, Olufsen MS, Rempala G, Slenning BD. Stochastic and deterministic models for agricultural production networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 2007; 4(3):373-402.
36. Thomaseth K, Cobelli C. Generalized sensitivity functions in physiological system identification. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1999; 27(5):607-616.
37. Banks HT, Davidian M, Samuels, JR. Jr., Sutton KL, An Inverse Problem Statistical Methodology Summary. In Mathematical and statistical estimation approaches in epidemiology, Chowell G, Hyman J, Bettencourt L, Castillo-Chavez C (eds). Springer Netherlands: 2009; 249-302.
38. Batzel J, Baselli G, Mukkamala R, Chon KH. Modelling and disentangling physiological mechanisms: linear and nonlinear identification techniques for analysis of cardiovascular regulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2009; 367(1892):1377-1391.
39. Banks HT, Dediu S, Ernstberger SL, Kappel F. Generalized sensitivities and optimal experimental design. Journal of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems 2010; 18(1):25-83.
40. Milišić V, Quarteroni A. Analysis of lumped parameter models for blood flow simulations and their relation with 1D models. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 2004; 38(04):613-632.
41. Hindmarsh AC, Brown PN, Grant KE, Lee SL, Serban R, Shumaker DE, Woodward CS. SUNDIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 2005; 31(3. (Available from: http://computation.llnl.gov/casc/sundials/main.html) [Accessed on 4 November 2014]; 363-396.
42. Hindmarsh AC. The PVODE and IDA algorithms. Technical Report, Technical Report UCRL-ID-141558, LLNL, Livermore, California, 2000.
43. Chapelle D, Fragu M, Mallet V, Moireau P. Fundamental principles of data assimilation underlying the Verdandi library: applications to biophysical model personalization within euHeart. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2013; 51(11):1221-1233. (Available from: http://verdandi.sourceforge.net/) [Accessed on 04 November 2014].
44. Lillacci G, Khammash M. Parameter estimation and model selection in computational biology. PLoS Computational Biology6 2010; (3):e1000696.
45. 2014; Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Imaging and Modelling Challenges(O Camara, T Mansi, M Pop, K Rhode, M Sermesant, and A Young, eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.8330, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Nagoya, Japan. (Available from: http://www.vascularmodel.org/miccai2013/;http://www.cardiacatlas.org/web/stacom2013/) [Accessed on 4 November 2014].
46. Pant S, Fabrèges B, Gerbeau JF, Vignon-Clementel IE, A Multiscale Filtering-Based Parameter Estimation Method for Patient-Specific Coarctation Simulations in Rest and Exercise. In Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart. Imaging and Modelling Challenges, Camara O, Mansi T, Pop M, Rhode K, M Sermesant, Young A, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.8330. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 102-109, 2014).
47. Moireau P, Bertoglio C, Xiao N, Figueroa CA, Taylor CA, Chapelle D, Gerbeau JF. Sequential identification of boundary support parameters in a fluid-structure vascular model using patient image data. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2013; 12(3):475-496.
48. Bertoglio C, Barber D, Gaddum N, Valverde I, Rutten M, Beerbaum P, Moireau P, Hose R, Gerbeau JF. Identification of artery wall stiffness: In vitro validation and in vivo results of a data assimilation procedure applied to a 3D fluidstructure interaction model. Journal of Biomechanics 2014; 47(5):1027-1034.
49. FELiScE: Finite Elements for LIfe SCiences and Engineering. (Available from: https://gforge.inria.fr/projects/felisce) [[Accessed on 4 November 2014].
50. Moghadam ME, Bazilevs Y, Hsia TY, Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL. A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations. Computational Mechanics 2011; 48(3):277-291.
51. Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y. Patient-specific isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2009; 198(45):3534-3550.
52. George PL, Borouchaki H, Saltel E. Ultimate robustness in meshing an arbitrary polyhedron. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering (IJNME) 2003; 58:1061-1089.
53. Loseille A, Löhner R. Adaptive anisotropic simulations in Aerodynamics, in 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA 2010-169: Olando, FL, USA, 2010. (Available from: http://www-roc.inria.fr/gamma/Adrien.Loseille/index.php?page=softwares).
54. Westerhof N, Elzinga G. Normalized input impedance and arterial decay time over heart period are independent of animal size. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 1991; 261(1):R126-R133.
55. Laskey WK, Parker HG, Ferrari VA, Kussmaul WG, Noordergraaf A. Estimation of total systemic arterial compliance in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 1990; 69:112-119.
56. LaDisa JF, Figueroa CA, Vignon-Clementel IE, Kim HJ, Xiao N, Ellwein LM, Chan FP, Feinstein JA, Taylor CA. Computational Simulations for Aortic Coarctation: Representative Results From a Sampling of Patients. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2011; 133:091008.
57. O'Rourke MF, Safar ME. Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: Cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension 2005; 46:200-204.
58. Stergiopulos N, Young DF, Rogge TR. Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. Journal of Biomechanics 1992; 25:1477-1488.
59. Sundareswaran KS, Pekkan K, Dasi LP, Whitehead K, Sharma S, Kanter KR, Fogel MA, Yoganathan AP. The total cavopulmonary connection resistance: a significant impact on single ventricle hemodynamics at rest and exercise. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology 2008; 295(6):H2427-H2435.
60. Baretta A, Corsini C, Marsden AL, Vignon-Clementel IE, Hsia TY, Dubini G, Migliavacca F, Pennati G. Respiratory effects on hemodynamics in patient-specific CFD models of the Fontan circulation under exercise conditions. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids 2012; 35:61-69.
61. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. Reduced sigma point filters for the propagation of means and covariances through nonlinear transformations. Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference, 2002, 2: IEEE, 2002; 887-892.
62. Van Der Merwe R, Doucet A, De Freitas N, Wan E. The unscented particle filter, Technical report CUED/F-INFENG/TR 380, Cambridge University Department of Engineering, Cambridge, England, 2000.