How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications

How We Think: A Theory of Goal-Oriented Decision Making and its Educational Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-245

  Schoenfeld, Alan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916984093     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203843000     Document Type: Book

References (95)

1. Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. (2000). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 327–356.
2. Alexander, P. A., & Winne, P. H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of educational psychology(2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Arcavi, A., Kessel, C., Meira, L., & Smith, J. P. (1998). Teaching mathematical problem solving: An analysis of an emergent classroom community. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education(Vol. 3, pp. 1–70). Washington, DC: Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences.
4. Arcavi, A., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2008). Using the unfamiliar to problematize the familiar. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(3), 280–295.
5. Ball, D. L. (undated). Annotated transcript of segments of Deborah Ball’s January 19, 1990, class.
6. Distributed by Ball at the research presession to the 1997 annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Diego.
7. Ball, D. L. (1990). Teacher’s class log (January 16).
8. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397.
9. Ball, D. L. (1997). What do students know? Facing challenges of distance, context, and desire in trying to hear children. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching(pp. 769–818). New York: Macmillan.
10. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics(pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
11. Ball, D. L., & Lampert, M. (1999). Situating research within an education context: A case study in mathematics teaching and learning. In E. R. Lagemann & L. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities(pp. 371–398). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Ball, D. L., Lewis, J., & Thames, M. H. (2008). Making mathematics work in school. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), A study of teaching: Multiple lenses, multiple views(pp. 13–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13. Ball, D. L., & Wilson, S. J. (1996). Integrity in teaching: Recognizing the fusion of the moral and the intellectual. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 155–192.
14. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Berliner, D. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13.
16. Berliner, D., & Calfee, D. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan.
17. Borko, H., & Peressini, D. (1998). Commentary on “Toward a theory of teaching-in-context.” Issues in Education, 4(1), 95–104.
18. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding(pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Burkhardt, G. H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.
20. Carpenter, T. P., Lindquist, M. M., Matthews, W., & Silver, E. A. (1983). Results of the third NAEP mathematics assessment: Secondary School. Mathematics Teacher, 76(9), 652–659.
21. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
23. Clancey, W. J., & Shortliffe, E. H. (Eds). (1984). Readings in medical AI: The first decade. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin.
25. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens. New York: Harcourt.
26. de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
27. diSessa, A. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models(pp. 15–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Feldman, J. (2006). From molecule to metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Foster, D., Noyce, P., & Spiegel, S. (2007). When assessment guides instruction: Silicon Valley’s Mathematics Assessment Collaborative. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Assessing mathematical proficiency(pp. 137–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207–226.
32. Gawande, A. (2007). Better: A surgeon’s notes on performance. New York: Holt.
33. Gawande, A. (2009). The cost conundrum: What a Texas town can teach us about health care. New Yorker, June 1. Downloaded January 31, 2010 from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/06/01/090601fa_fact_gawande?currentPage=all.
34. Groopman, J. (2007). How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
35. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record 111(9). Downloaded January 31, 2010 from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=15018.
36. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing(pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113.
39. Hinsley, D. A., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). From words to equations: Meaning and representation in algebra word problems. In M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension(pp. 89–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. E. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
41. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178–194.
43. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44. Lehrer, J. (2009). How we decide. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
45. Leinhardt, G. (1993) On teaching. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology(Vol. 4, pp. 1–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Leinhardt, G. (1998). On the messiness of overlapping goals and real settings. Issues in Education, 4(1), 125–132.
47. Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A commonplace for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(4th ed.). Washington, DC: AERA.
48. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
49. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. McGee, H. (2004). On food and cooking: The science and lore of the kitchen (revised and updated edition). New York: Scribner.
51. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
53. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
54. Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the “at rest” condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20, 10–14.
55. Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In: L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research(pp. 129–149). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
56. Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies(pp. 110–128). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education.
57. Minstrell, J., & Stimpson, V. (1996). A classroom environment for learning: Guiding students’ reconstruction of understanding and reasoning. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education(pp. 175–202). Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978–1979, Winter). Planning in classroom reality: An in-depth look. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 83–89.
59. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
60. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Philipp, R. A., & Sowder, J. T. (2002). Using eye-tracking technology to determine the best use of video with prospective and practicing teachers. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education(Vol. 4, pp. 233–240). Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia.
62. Pólya, G. (1945; 2nd ed., 1957). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63. Pólya, G. (1962, 1965; 2nd ed. 1981). Mathematical discovery (Vol. 1, 1962; Vol. 2, 1965). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Combined paper back edition, New York: Wiley, 1981.
64. Richardson, V. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of research on teaching(4th ed.). Washington, DC: AERA.
65. Russell, B. (1904). Recent works on the principles of mathematics. International Monthly, 4, 84.
66. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
67. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
69. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education(pp. 189–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355.
71. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning(pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
72. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998a). Reflections on a course in mathematical problem solving. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education(Vol. 3, pp. 81–113). Washington, DC: Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences.
73. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998b). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.
74. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(6), 641–649.
75. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). A highly interactive discourse structure. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Social constructivist teaching: Its affordances and constraints(pp. 131–170). New York: Elsevier.
76. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Problem solving from cradle to grave. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 11, 41–73.
77. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Method. In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning(2nd ed., pp. 69–107). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
78. Schoenfeld, A. H. (Ed.). (2008). A study of teaching: Multiple lenses, multiple views. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
79. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010a). How and why do teachers explain things the way they do? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines(pp. 83–106). New York: Springer.
80. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010b). Reflections of an accidental theorist. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 104–116.
81. Schoenfeld, A. H., Gamoran, M., Kessel, C., Leonard, M., Orbach, R., & Arcavi, A. (1992). Toward a comprehensive model of human tutoring in complex subject matter domains. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(4), 293–320.
82. Schoenfeld, A. H., Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. (2000). The detailed analysis of an established teacher carrying out a non-traditional lesson. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 281–325.
83. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. P., & Arcavi, A. A. (1993). Learning. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology(Vol. 4, pp. 55–175). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
84. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss.
85. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 17(1), 4–14.
86. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
87. Sikula, J. (Ed.). (1996). Handbook of research on teacher education(2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
88. Smith, B. P. (2000). Emerging themes in problems experienced by student teachers: A framework for analysis. College Student Journal. Downloaded April 20, 2009, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCR/is_4_34/ai_69750211/.
89. Stigler, J., Fernandez, C., and Yoshida, M. (1996). Cultures of mathematics instruction in Japanese and American elementary classrooms. In T. P. Rohlen & G. K. LeTendre (Eds.), Teaching and learning in Japan(pp. 213–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Stigler, J, & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: Free Press.
91. VanLehn, K., & Brown, J. S. (1982). Competitive argumentation in computational theories of cognition. (Xerox Cognitive and Instructional Science Series Report No. CIS-14.) Palo Alto, CA: Xerox.
92. van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269.
93. Wigner, E. P. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13, 1–14.
94. Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.). (1986). Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
95. Zimmerlin, D., & Nelson, M. (1999). The detailed analysis of a beginning teacher carrying out a traditional lesson. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 263–280.