Explaining over-requirement in software development projects: An experimental investigation of behavioral effects

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 380-394

  Shmueli, Ofira ^a   Pliskin, Nava ^a   Fink, Lior ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Demands abilities fit; Endowment effect; Experiment; Gold plating; I designed it myself effect; IKEA effect; Over requirement; Over specification; Software development

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTS; GOLD PLATING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPECIFICATIONS;

BEHAVIORAL EFFECTS; DEMANDS-ABILITIES FIT; ENDOWMENT EFFECT; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; IKEA EFFECT; OVER-REQUIREMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE FEATURES;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84916939500     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Andres H.P., Zmud R.W. A contingency approach to software project coordination. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2001, 18(3):41-70.
2. Ariely D., Jones S. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape our Decisions 2008, Harper Collins, New York.
3. Baccarini D., Salm G., Love P.E.D. Management of risks in information technology projects. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2004, 104(4):286-295.
4. Battles B.E., Mark D., Ryan C. An open letter to CEOs: how otherwise good managers spend too much on information technology. McKinsey Q. 1996, 1996(3):116-127.
5. Belk R.W. Possessions and the extended self. J. Consum. Res. 1988, 15(2):139-168.
6. Belk R.W., Coon G.S. Gift giving as agapic love: an alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. J. Consum. Res. 1993, 20(3):393-417.
7. Belvedere V., Grando A., Ronen B. Cognitive biases and overdesign: an investigation on the unconscious mistakes of industrial designers and on their effects on product offering. Behavioral Issues in Operations Management 2013, 125-140. Springer-Verlag, London. I. Giannoccaro (Ed.).
8. Bernstein L. Things I learned from taming software development. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 2012, 37(6):5-6.
9. Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J., Payne J.W. A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1990, 45(1):111-139.
10. Boehm B.W. Software risk management: principles and practices. IEEE Softw. 1991, 8(1):32-41.
11. Boehm B.W., Papaccio P.N. Understanding and controlling software costs. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 1988, 14(10):1462-1477.
12. Buschmann F. Learning from failure, part 1: scoping and requirements woes. IEEE Softw. 2009, 26(6):68-69.
13. Buschmann F. Learning from failure, part 2: featuritis, performitis, and other diseases. IEEE Softw. 2010, 27(1):10-11.
14. Campbell D.J. Task complexity: a review and analysis. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1988, 13(1):40-52.
15. Chen A.N.K., Edgington T.M. Assessing value in organizational knowledge creation: considerations for knowledge workers. MIS Q. 2005, 29(2):279-309.
16. Coman A., Ronen B. Overdosed management: how excess of excellence begets failure. Hum. Syst. Manag. 2009, 28(3):93-99.
17. Coman A., Ronen B. Icarus' predicament: managing the pathologies of overspecification and overdesign. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2010, 28(3):237-244.
18. Compeau D., Marcolin B., Kelley H., Higgins C. Generalizability of information systems research using student subjects - a reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Inf. Syst. Res. 2012, 23(4):1093-1109.
19. Cule P., Schmidt R., Lyytinen K., Keil M. Strategies for heading off IS project failure. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2000, 17(2):65-73.
20. Dellaert B.G.C., Stremersch S. Marketing mass-customized products: striking a balance between utility and complexity. J. Mark. Res. 2005, 42(2):219-227.
21. Demarco T., Lister T. Risk management during requirements. IEEE Softw. 2003, 20(5):99-101.
22. Dominus M. Creeping featurism and the ratchet effect available at, (accessed September 17, 2013). http://blog.plover.com/prog/featurism.html.
23. Edwards J.R. An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Acad. Manage. J. 1996, 39(2):292-339.
24. Elliott B. Anything is possible: managing feature creep in an innovation rich environment. Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, July 29-Aug 1, Piscataway, New Jersey 2007.
25. Franke N., Schreier M. Why customers value self-designed products: the importance of process effort and enjoyment. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2010, 27(7):1020-1031.
26. Franke N., Schreier M., Kaiser U. The "I designed it myself" effect in mass customization. Manag. Sci. 2010, 56(1):125-140.
27. Furby L. Possession in humans: an exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Soc. Behav. Personal. 1978, 6(1):49-65.
28. Furby L. Possessions: towards a theory of their meaning and function throughout the life cycle. Life Span Development and Behavior 1978, 297-336. Academic Press, New York. P.B. Baltes (Ed.).
29. Graziano A.M., Raulin M.L. Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry 1993, Harper Collins, New York. second ed.
30. Greenberger D.B., Strasser S., Cummings L.L., Dunham R.B. The impact of personal control on performance and satisfaction. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1989, 43(1):29-51.
31. Haidt J., Rodin J. Control and efficacy as interdisciplinary bridges. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1999, 3(4):317-337.
32. Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy 2003, 32(7):1159-1177.
33. Heyman J.E., Orhun Y., Ariely D. Auction fever: the effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18(4):7-21.
34. Hofman R. Behavioral economics in software quality engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 2011, 16(2):278-293.
35. Hoorens V., Remmers N., van de Riet K. Time is an amazingly variable amount of money: endowment and ownership effects in the subjective value of working time. J. Econ. Psychol. 1999, 20(4):383-405.
36. Houston D.X., Mackulak G.T., Collofello J.S. Stochastic simulation of risk factor potential effects for software development risk management. J. Syst. Softw. 2001, 59(3):247-257.
37. Johnson E.J., Payne J.W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Manag. Sci. 1985, 31(4):395-414.
38. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
39. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem. J. Polit. Econ. 1990, 98(6):1325-1348.
40. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 1991, 5(1):193-206.
41. Karasek R.A. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979, 24(2):285-308.
42. Kaur K., Jyoti B., Rani R. Analysis of gold plating: a software development risk. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Commun. Eng. 2013, 2(1):51-54.
43. Kautz K. The impact of pricing and opportunistic behavior on information systems development. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 2009, 10(3):24-41.
44. Keil M., Tan B.C.Y., Wei K.K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., Wassenaar A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Q. 2000, 24(2):299-325.
45. Keil M., Im G.P., Mahring M. Reporting bad news on software projects: the effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving. Inf. Syst. J. 2007, 17(1):59-87.
46. Khanfar K., Elzamly A., Al-Ahmad W., El-Qawasmeh E., Alsamara K., Abuleil S. Managing software project risks with the chi-square technique. Int. Manag. Rev. 2008, 4(2):18-29.
47. Knetsch J.L., Sinden J.A. Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Q. J. Econ. 1984, 99(3):507-521.
48. Kohn M.L., Schooler C. Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification 1983, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
49. Labroo A.A., Kim S. The "instrumentality" heuristic: why metacognitive difficulty is desirable during goal pursuit. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20(1):127-134.
50. Livingstone L.P., Nelson D.L., Barr S.H. Person-environment fit and creativity: an examination of supply-value and demand-ability versions of fit. J. Manag. 1997, 23(2):119-146.
51. Lowry G.S., Franssen C.L., Lowry J.E. Handcrafting attachment: a user-centered approach. J. Serv. Sci. 2011, 4(1):39-44.
52. Malhotra N., Bhardwaj M., Kaur R. Estimating the effects of gold plating using fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2012, 3(4):4806-4808.
53. Markus M.L., Keil M. If we build it, they will come: designing information systems that people want to use. Sloan Manage. Rev. 1994, 35(4):11-25.
54. Mochon D., Norton M.I., Ariely D. Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2012, 29(4):363-369.
55. Moreau C.P., Bonney L., Herd K.B. It's the thought (and the effort) that counts: how customizing for others differs from customizing for oneself. J. Mark. 2011, 75(5):120-133.
56. NASA Recommended Approach to Software Development 1992, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland.
57. Norton M.I., Mochon D., Ariely D. The IKEA effect: when labor leads to love. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2009, 87(2):30.
58. Norton M.I., Mochon D., Ariely D. The "IKEA effect": when labor leads to love. Harv. Bus. Sch. Work. Pap. 2011, 11-091:1-34.
59. Norton M.I., Mochon D., Ariely D. The IKEA effect: when labor leads to love. J. Consum. Psychol. 2012, 22(3):453-460.
60. Park H.I., Beehr T.A., Han K., Grebner S.I. Demands-abilities fit and psychological strain: moderating effects of personality. Int. J. Stress. Manag. 2012, 19(1):1-33.
61. Peck J., Shu S.B. The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. J. Consum. Res. 2009, 36(3):434-447.
62. Pierce J.L., Kostova T., Dirks K.T. The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2003, 7(1):84-107.
63. Raghu T.S., Sinha R., Vinze A., Burton O. Willingness to pay in an open source software environment. Inf. Syst. Res. 2009, 20(2):218-236.
64. Reips U.D., Funke F. Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS generator. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40(3):699-704.
65. Ronen B., Pass S. Focused Operations Management: Achieving More with Existing Resources 2008, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
66. Ronen B., Pass S. Reducing the software value gap. Commun. ACM 2014, 57(5):80-87.
67. Ropponen J., Lyytinen K. Components of software development risk: how to address them? A project manager survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 2000, 26(2):98-112.
68. Rust R.T., Thompson D.V., Hamilton R. Defeating feature fatigue. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2006, 84(2):98-107.
69. Sargent L.D., Terry D.J. The effects of work control and job demands on employee adjustment and work performance. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 1998, 71(3):219-236.
70. Schmidt R., Lyytinen K., Keil M., Cule P. Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2001, 17(4):5-36.
71. Schreier M. The value increment of mass-customized products: an empirical assessment. J. Consum. Behav. 2006, 5(4):317-327.
72. Seddon P.B., Scheepers R. Towards the improved treatment of generalization of knowledge claims in IS research: drawing general conclusions from samples. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2012, 21(1):6-21.
73. Shirani A.I., Tafti M.H.A., Affisco J.F. Task and technology fit: a comparison of two technologies for synchronous and asynchronous group communication. Inf. Manag. 1999, 36(3):139-150.
74. Stacy W., Macmillian J. Cognitive bias in software engineering. Commun. ACM 1995, 38(6):57-63.
75. Strahilevitz M.A., Loewenstein G. The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. J. Consum. Res. 1998, 25(3):276-289.
76. Taylor M.S. The motivational effects of task challenge: a laboratory investigation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 1981, 27(2):255-278.
77. Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1980, 1(1):39-60.
78. Ulrich K.T. Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society. University of Pennsylvania Working Paper 2009, (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1951106, accessed February 5 2014).
79. Umapathy K., Purao S., Barton R. Designing enterprise integration solutions: effectively. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2008, 17(5):518-527.
80. Vessey I., Galletta D. Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2(1):63-84.
81. von Hippel E. User toolkits for innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2001, 18(4):247-257.
82. Westfall L. The what, why, who, when and how of software requirements. Proceedings of the ASQ World Conference on Quality and Improvement, May 16-18, Seattle, Washington 2005.
83. Wetherbe J.C. Executive information requirements: getting it right. MIS Q. 1991, 15(1):51-65.
84. Wheatcraft L.S. Triple your chances of project success risk and requirements available at, (accessed September 17, 2013). http://www.reqexperts.com/requirements-whitepapers.html.
85. Williams L., Kesslerr R.R., Cunningham W., Jeffries R. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Softw. 2000, 17(4):19-25.
86. Zigurs I., Buckland B.K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Q. 1998, 22(3):313-334.