Erratum to "Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation" [Technological Forecasting & Social Change 90 (2015) 269-284] DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.024;Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 90, Issue PA, 2015, Pages 269-284

  Burcharth, Ana Luiza Lara de Araújo ^a   Lettl, Christopher ^b   Ulhøi, John Parm ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Absorptive capacity; Experimentation; Innovation; Organizational antecedents; SMEs

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY; COMBINATIVE CAPABILITIES; EXPERIMENTATION; KNOWLEDGE ABSORPTIONS; MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS; ORGANIZATIONAL ANTECEDENTS; ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; SMES;

INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE;

DENMARK;

EID: 84916882368     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.024     Document Type: Erratum

References (94)

1. Nelson R.R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Polit. Econ. 1959, 67:297-306.
2. Von Hippel E. The Sources of Innovation 1988, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
3. Lundvall B.-Å. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning 1992, Pinter, London.
4. Powell W.W., Doput K.W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganisational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Q. 1996, 41:116-145.
5. Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Manag. Sci. 2006, 52:68-82.
6. Lundvall B.-Å., Johnson B., Andersen E.S., Dalum B. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Res. Policy 2002, 31:213.
7. Krammer S.M.S. Assessing the relative importance of multiple channels for embodied and disembodied technological spillovers. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 81:272-286.
8. Millikan M.F., Rostow W.W. A Proposal: Key to an Effective Foreign Policy 1957, Harper, New York.
9. Rostow W.W. The take-off into self-sustained growth. Econ. J. 1956, 66:25-48.
10. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Q. 1990, 35:128-152.
11. Lane P.J., Koka B.R., Pathak S. The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2006, 31:833-863.
12. Volberda H.W., Foss N.J., Lyles M.A. Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: how to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 2010, 21:934-954.
13. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. Econ. J. 1989, 99:569-596.
14. van den Bosch F.A.J., Volberda H.W., de Boer M. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. 1999, 10:551-568.
15. Jansen J.J.P., Van Den Bosch F.A.J., Volberda H.W. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?. Acad. Manag. J. 2005, 48:999-1015.
16. Arrow K.J. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am. Econ. Rev. 1963, 53:941-974.
17. Grant R.M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 1996, 17:109-122.
18. Nickerson J.A., Zenger T.R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: the problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 2004, 15:617-632.
19. Macher J.T. Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: a knowledge-based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Manag. Sci. 2006, 52:826-843.
20. Bierly P.E., Damanpour F., Santoro M.D. The application of external knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. J. Manag. Stud. 2009, 46:481-509.
21. Katz R., Allen T.J. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R D Manag. 1982, 12:7-20.
22. March J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 1991, 2:71-87.
23. Lavie D., Kang J., Rosenkopf L. Balance within and across domains: the performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances. Organ. Sci. 2011, 22:1517-1538.
24. Schumpeter J.A. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle 1934, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
25. Riggs W., Hippel E.V. Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: the case of scientific instruments. Res. Policy 1994, 23:459-469.
26. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48:1-23.
27. Lilien G.L., Morrison P.D., Searls K., Sonnack M., Von Hippel E. Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48:1042-1059.
28. Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Manag. Sci. 2003, 49:751-766.
29. Laursen K., Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 2006, 27:131-150.
30. Saxenian A. Regional networks and the resurgence of silicon valley. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1990, 33:89-113.
31. Mowery D.C., Oxley J.E., Silverman B.S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strateg. Manag. J. 1996, 17:77-91.
32. Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manag. Sci. 1999, 45:905-917.
33. Stuart T.E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a hi-technology industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 2000, 21:791-811.
34. Ahuja G., Katila R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 2001, 21:197-220.
35. Grant R.M., Baden-Fuller C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J. Manag. Stud. 2004, 41:61-84.
36. Sampson R. R&D alliances & firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Manag. J. 2007, 50:364-386.
37. Von Hippel E. Horizontal innovation networks - by and for users. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2007, 16:293-315.
38. Lettl C., Hienerth C., Gemuenden H.G. Exploring how lead users develop radical innovation: opportunity recognition and exploitation in the field of medical equipment technology. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2008, 55:219-233.
39. Huston L., Sakkab N. Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble's new model for innovation. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2006, 84:58-66.
40. Cattani G. Technological pre-adaptation, speciation, and emergence of new technologies: how Corning invented and developed fiber optics. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2006, 15:285-318.
41. Danneels E. Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strateg. Manag. J. 2008, 29:519-519.
42. Hill C.W.L., Rothaermel F.T. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2003, 28:257-274.
43. Zahra S.A., George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2002, 27:185-203.
44. Liao J., Welsch H., Stoica M. Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: an empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs. Enterp. Theory Pract. 2003, 28:63-85.
45. Lewin A.Y., Massini S., Peeters C. Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organ. Sci. 2014, (forthcoming).
46. Vega-Jurado J., Gutierrez-Gracia A., Fernandez-de-Lucio I. Analyzing the determinants of firm's absorptive capacity: beyond R&D. R&D Manag. 2008, 38:392-392.
47. Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 1992, 3:383-397.
48. Lenox M., King A. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strateg. Manag. J. 2004, 25:331-345.
49. Fosfuri A., Tribó J.A. Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovative performance. Omega 2008, 36:173-187.
50. Foss N.J., Laursen K., Pedersen T. Linking customer interaction and innovation: the mediating role of new organizational practices. Organ. Sci. 2011, 22:980-999.
51. Carlile P.R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 2004, 15:555-568.
52. Escribano A., Fosfuri A., Tribó J.A. Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Res. Policy 2009, 38:96-105.
53. Cyert R.M., March J.G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm 1963, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
54. Mahoney J.T. Economic Foundations of Strategy 2005, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
55. Sitkin S.B. Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses. Research on Organization Behavior 1992, Elsevier, New York. B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings (Eds.).
56. Farson N., Keyes R. The failure-tolerant leader. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2009, 80:64-71.
57. Chandy R.K., Tellis G.J. Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. J. Mark. Res. 1998, 35:474-487.
58. Nijssen E.J., Hillebrand B., Vermeulen P.A.M. Unraveling willingness to cannibalize: a closer look at the barrier to radical innovation. Technovation 2005, 25:1400-1409.
59. Kale P., Singh H. Permutter, learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strateg. Manag. J. 2000, 21:7-20.
60. Levinthal D.A., March J.G. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1981, 2:307-333.
61. Martino J.P. A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2003, 70:719-733.
62. Tonn B.E. A methodology for organizing and quantifying the results of environmental scanning exercises. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2008, 75:595-609.
63. Yasai-Ardekani M., Nystrom P.C. Designs for environmental scanning systems: tests of a contingency theory. Manag. Sci. 1996, 42:187-204.
64. Nystrom P.C., Ramamurthy K., Wilson A.L. Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2002, 19:221-247.
65. Whelan E., Teigland R., Donnellan B., Golden W. How internet technologies impact information flows in R&D: reconsidering the technological gatekeeper. R D Manag. 2010, 40:400-413.
66. Nohria N., Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation?. Acad. Manag. J. 1996, 39:1245-1264.
67. Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manag. J. 1991, 34:555-590.
68. Joshi A.W., Sharma S. Customer knowledge development: antecedents and impact on new product performance. J. Mark. 2004, 68:47-59.
69. Menon T., Pfeffer J. Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: explaining the preference for outsiders. Manag. Sci. 2003, 49:497-513.
70. Inkpen A.C. Learning through alliances: general motors and NUMMI. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2005, 47:114-136.
71. Carmeli A., Tisher A. CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: the role of team trust and learning from failure. Strateg. Organ. 2011, 10:31-54.
72. Christensen C.M., Ranor M.E. The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth 2003, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
73. Millson M.R., Raj S.P., Wilemon D. Strategic partnering for developing new products. Res. Technol. Manag. 1996, 39:41-49.
74. Tyre M.J., Von Hippel E. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 1997, 8:71-83.
75. Perkman M., Walsh K. University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2007, 9:259-280.
76. Lichtenthaler U., Ernst H. Attitudes to externally organizing knowledge management tasks: a review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome. R D Manag. 2006, 36:367-367.
77. Herzog P., Leker J. Open and closed innovation - different innovation cultures for different strategies. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2010, 52:322-343.
78. Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 2001, 22:287-306.
79. Gulati R. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strateg. Manag. J. 1999, 20:397-420.
80. Hagedoorn J., Letterie W., Palm F. The information value of R&D alliances: the preference for local or distant ties. Strateg. Organ. 2011, 9:283-309.
81. Lichtenthaler U., Lichtenthaler E. A capability-based framework for open innovation: complementing absorptive capacity. J. Manag. Stud. 2009, 46:1315-1338.
82. Von Hippel E. Democratizing Innovation 2005, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
83. Gulati R., Lavie D., Singh H. The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 2009, 30.
84. Flatten T., Greve G., Brettel M. Absorptive capacity and firm performance in SMEs: the mediating influence of strategic alliances. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2011, 8:137-152.
85. European Business: Facts and Figures 2009, Eurostat, Luxembourg.
86. Schein E.H. Three cultures of management: the key to organizational learning. Sloan Manag. Rev. 1996, 9-20.
87. Tzabbar D., Aharonson B.S., Amburgey T.L., Al-Laham A. When is the whole bigger than the sum of its parts? Bundling knowledge stocks for innovative success. Strateg. Organ. 2008, 6:375-406.
88. Kristal A.R. Evaluation of nutrition interventions. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease 2008, Elsevier, London. A. Coulston, C.J. Boushey (Eds.).
89. Leiponen A., Helfat C.E. Innovation objectives, knowledge sources and benefits of breadth. Strateg. Manag. J. 2010, 31:224-236.
90. Jaworski B.J., Kohli A.K. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. J. Mark. 1993, 57:53-71.
91. Jones G.R. Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 1986, 29:262-280.
92. Burton R.M., Lauridsen J., Obel B. Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48:1461-1485.
93. Bierly P.E., Daly P.S. Sources of external organisational learning in small manufacturing firms. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2007, 38:45-68.
94. Anderson E., Weitz B. The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. J. Mark. Res. 1992, 29:18-34.