Exploring how lead users develop radical Innovation: Opportunity recognition and exploitation in the field of medical equipment technology

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 219-233

  Lettl, Christopher ^a   Hienerth, Christoph ^b,c   Gemuenden, Hans Georg ^d  

^a AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

^b Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

^c VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^d TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lead user; Opportunity exploitation; Opportunity recognition; Radical innovation

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; DESIGN; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; MANAGEMENT; MARKETING;

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY; OPPORTUNITY EXPLOITATION; OPPORTUNITY RECOGNITION; RADICAL INNOVATION;

INNOVATION;

EID: 43749098784     PISSN: 00189391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2008.919717     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. W. Abernathy and J. M. Utterback, "A dynamic model of product and process innovation," Int. J. Manage. Sci., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 639-656, 1975.
2. W. Abernathy and J. M. Utterback, "Patterns of industrial innovation," Technol. Rev., vol. 80, pp. 40-47, 1978.
3. D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, "Case study methodology as a means of theory building: Performance measurement in facilities management organisations," Work Study, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 95-104, 2001.
4. R. Amit, E. Muller, and I. Cockburn, "Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity," J. Bus. Venturing, vol. 10, pp. 95-106, 1995.
5. G. J. Avlonitis, P. G. Papastathopoulou, and S. P. Gounaris, "An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios," J. Product Innovation Manage., vol. 188, pp. 324-342, 2001.
6. R. A. Baron, "Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs 'connect the dots' to identify new business opportunities," Acad. Manage. Perspect., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 104-119, 2006.
7. W. G. Biemans, "User and third-party involvement in developing medical equipment innovations," Technovation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 163-182, 1991.
8. S. Birley, "The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process," J. Bus. Venturing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 107-117, 1985.
9. M. Boden, Dimensions of Creativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
10. L. J. Bourgeois and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, "Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry," Manage. Sci., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 816-835, 1988.
11. K. Brockhoff, "Customer's perspectives of involvement in new product development," Int. J. Technol. Manage., vol. 26, no. 5/6, pp. 464-481, 2003.
12. R. K. Chandy and G. J. Tellis, "The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation," J. Marketing, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1-17, 2000.
13. S. Chetty, "The case study method for research in small and medium-sized firms," Int. Small Bus. J., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 73-85, 1996.
14. C. M. Christensen, The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
15. M. A. Collins and T. M. Amabile, "Motivation and creativitcy," in Handbook of Creativity, R. J. Sternberg, Ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.
16. M. Csikszentmihalyi, "Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural arid energistic approaches to cognition," New Ideas Psychol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 159-176, 1988.
17. D. W. Dahl and P. Moreau, "The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation," J. Marketing Res., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 47-60, 2002.
18. K. B. Dahlin and D. M. Behrens, "When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness," Res. Policy, vol. 34, pp. 717-737, 2005.
19. E. Danneels and E. J. Kleinschmidt, "Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance," J. Product Innovation Manage., vol. 18, pp. 357-373, 2001.
20. P. Davidsson and B. Honig, "The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs," J. Bus. Venturing, vol. 18, pp. 301-331, 2003.
21. P. C. De Weerd-Nederhof, "Qualitative case study research. The case of a PhD research project on organizing and managing new product development systems," Manage. Decis., vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 513-538, 2001.
22. K. M. Eisenhardt, "Building theories from case study research," Acad. Manage,. Rev., vol. 14, no. 4. pp. 532-550, 1989.
23. K. M. Eisenhardt and M. E. Graebrier, "Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25-32, 2007.
24. N. Franke and S. Shah, "How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users," Res. Policy, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 157-178, 2003.
25. N. Franke and E. von Hippel, "Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits; The case of Apache security software," Res. Policy, vol. 32, no. 7. pp. 1199-1215, 2003.
26. N. Franke, E. von Hippel, and M. Schreier, "Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead user theory," J. Product Innovation Manage., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 301-315, 2006.
27. R. Garcia and R. Calantone, "A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review," J. Product Innovation Manage., vol. 19, pp. 110-132, 2002.
28. H. Gatignon, M. L. Tushman, W. Smith, and P. Anderson, "A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics," Manage. Sci., vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1103-1122, 2002.
29. B. Gillham, Case Study Research Methods. London, U.K.: Continuum, 2000.
30. S. G. Green, M. B. Gavin, and L. Aiman-Smith, "Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 203-214, Aug. 1995.
31. K. E. Gruner and C. Homburg, "Does customer interaction enhance new product success?," J. Bus. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2000.
32. J. Hauschildt and T. Schlaak, "Zur Messung des Innovationsgrades neuer Produkte," Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, vol. 71, pp. 161-182, 2001.
33. F. Hayek, "The use of knowledge in society," Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 519-530, 1945.
34. C. Herstatt and E. von Hippel, "Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a 'low-tech' field," J. Product Innovation Manage., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 213-221, 1992.
35. C. Hienerth, "The commercialization of user innovations: Sixteen cases in an extreme sporting industry," presented at the Research and Development Managing Conference, Sesimbra, Portugal, 2004.
36. K. J. Holyoak and P. Thagard, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
37. M. T. G. Halt, R. F. Hurley, and G. A. Knight, "Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance," Ind. Marketing Manage., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 429-438, 2004.
38. I. Kirzner, "Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach," J. Econ. Literature, vol. 35, pp. 60-85, 1997.
39. S. Ko and J. E. Butler, "Prior knowledge, bisociative mode of thinking and entrepreneurial opportunity recognition," presented at the Academy Management Conf., Honolulu, Hawaii, Aug. 2005.
40. K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
41. R. Leifer, C. M. McDermott, G. C. O'Connor, L. Peters, M. Rice, and R. Veryzer, Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
42. D. Leonard-Barton and J. L. Doyle, "Commercializing technology: Imaginative understanding of user needs," in Engines of Innovation R. S. Rosenbloom and W. J. Spencer, Eds. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996, pp. 177-208.
43. G. L. Lilien, P. D. Morrison, K. Searls, M. Sonnack, and E. von Hippel, "Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development," Manage. Sci., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1042-1059, 2002.
44. C. Luethje, "Customers as co-inventors: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of customer-driven innovations in the field of medical equipment," presented at the 32nd Annu. Conf. European Marketing Academy (EMAC), Glasgow, U.K., 2003.
45. C. Luethje and C. Herstatt, "The lead user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research," R&D Manage., vol. 34, no. 5. pp. 553-568, 2004.
46. C. Luethje, C. Herstatt, and E. von Hippel, "User innovators and 'local' information: The case of mountain biking," Res. Policy, vol. 34, pp. 951-965, 2005.
47. G. S. Lynn, J. G. Morone, and A. S. Paulson, "Marketing and discontinuous innovation: The probe and learn process," California Manage. Rev., vol. 38, no. 3. pp. 8-37, 1996.
48. J. A. Maxwell, Qualitative Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996.
49. J. G. March, "Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice," Bell J. Econ., vol. 9, pp. 587-608, 1978.
50. R. R. McCrae, "Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience," J. Pers. Social Psychol., vol. 52, pp. 1258-1265, 1987.
51. C. M. McDermott, "Managing radical product development in large, manufacturing firms: A longitudinal study," J. Oper. Manage., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 631-644, 1999.
52. C. M. McDermott and G. O'Connor, "Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues," J. Product Innovation Manage. vol. 19, pp. 424-438, 2002.
53. H. Mehrwald, Das 'not invented here'-Syndrom in Forschung und Entwicklung. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1999.
54. P. D. Morrison, J. H. Roberts, and E. von Hippel, "Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market," Manage. Sci. vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1513-1527, 2000.
55. P. D. Morrison, J. H. Roberts, and D. E. Midgley, "The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status," Res. Policy, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 351-362, 2004.
56. K. A. Neuendorf, The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
57. I. Nonaka, G. von Krogh, and S. Voelpel, "Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances," Org. Stud. vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1179-1208, 2006.
58. G. C. O'Connor, "Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects," J. Product Innovation Manage., vol. 15, no. 2. pp. 151-166, 1998.
59. G. C. O'Connor and R. W. Veryzer, "The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation," J. Product Innovation Manage. vol. 18, pp. 231-246, 2001.
60. C. Perry, "Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing," Eur. J. Marketing, vol. 32, no. 9/10, pp. 785-797, 1998.
61. P. M. Podsakoff, S. C. MacKenzie, J. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, "Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies," J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 88, no. 5. pp. 879-903, 2003.
62. E. B. Roberts, "What we've learned: Managing invention and innovation," Res. Technol. Manage., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 11-29, 1988.
63. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, 4th ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
64. S. Salomo, "Konzept und messung des innovationsgrades - Ergebnisse einer empirischen studie zu innovativen entwicklungsvorhaben," in Empirie und Betriebswirtschaft: Entwicklungen und Perspektiven, M. Schwaiger and D. Harhoff, Eds. Stuttgart, Germany: Schäfer-Poeschel, 2003, pp. 399-427.
65. M. Schreier, S. Oberhauser, and R. Prügl, "Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities," Marketing Lett., vol. 18, nos. 1-2, pp. 15-30, 2007.
66. S. Shah, "From innovation to firm formation in the windsurfing, skateboarding, and snowboarding industries," Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Working Paper 05-0107, 2000.
67. S. Shah and M. Trippsas, "When do user-innovators start firms? Towards a theory of user-entrepreneurship," Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Working Paper #04-0106, 2005.
68. S. Shane and S. Venkataraman, "The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 217-226, 2000.
69. S. Shane, "Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities." Org. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4. pp. 448-469, 2000.
70. B. Shaw, "The role of the interaction between the user and the manufacturer in medical equipment innovation," R&D Manage., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 283-292, 1985.
71. H. Simon, Administrative Behaviour. New York: Macmillan, 1957.
72. H. Simon, Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.
73. N. S. Craig, "The case study: A useful research method for information management," J. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, pp. 123-133, 1990.
74. R. E. Stake, The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage, 2000.
75. R. J. Sternberg, Ed., Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.
76. D. J. Teece, "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy," Res. Policy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 285-305, 1986.
77. S. H. Thomke and F. von Hippel, "Customers as innovators: A new way to create value," Harvard Bus. Rev., vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 74-81, 2002.
78. D. Ucbasaran, P. Westhead, and M. Wright, "The focus of entrepreneurial research: Contextual and process issues," Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 57-80, 2001.
79. J. M. Utterback and F. F. Suárez, "Innovation, competition, and industry structure," Res. Policy, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 1993.
80. G. L. Urban and E. von Hippel, "Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products," Manage. Sci., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 569-582, 1988.
81. G. L. Urban, B. D. Weinberg, and J. R. Hauser, "Premarket forecasting of really-new products," J. Marketing, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 47-60, 1996.
82. S. Vandermerve, "Diffusing new ideas in-house," J. Product Innovation Manage., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 256-264, 1987.
83. S. Venkatarman, "The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor's perspective," in Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, J. Katz and R. Brockhaus, Eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1997, pp. 119-138.
84. E. Von Hippel, "Lead users: A source of novel product concepts," Manage. Sci., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 791-805, 1986.
85. E. Von Hippel, The Sources of Innovation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1988.
86. E. Von Hippel, "Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation," Manage. Sci., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 429-439, 1994.
87. E. Von Hippel, "Economics of product development by users: The impact of 'sticky' local information," Manage. Sci., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 629-644, 1998.
88. E. Von Hippel, "Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software," MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., vol. 42, pp. 82-86, 2001.
89. E. Von Hippel, Democratizing Innovation: Users Take Center Stage. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
90. T. B. Ward, "Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship," J. Bus. Venturing, vol. 19, pp. 173-188, 2004.
91. R. Yin, Case Study Research - Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks,, CA: Sage, 1994.
92. J. Zhongqi, N. Hewitt-Dundas, and N. J. Thompson, "Innovativeness and performance: Evidence from manufacturing sectors," J. Strateg. Marketing, vol. 12, no. 4. pp. 255-266, 2004.