The impact of value-directed remembering on the own-race bias

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 154, Issue , 2015, Pages 62-68

  DeLozier, Sarah ^a   Rhodes, Matthew G ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Face recognition; Memory; Own race bias; Self paced study; Value directed remembering

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RECALL; RECOGNITION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84916608353     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ackerman J.M., Shapiro J.R., Neuberg S.L., Kenrick D.T., Becker D.V., Griskevicius V., et al. They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science 2006, 17:836-840.
2. Ariel R., Dunlosky J. When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?. Memory & Cognition 2013, 41:416-428.
3. Ariel R., Dunlosky J., Bailey H. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009, 138:432-447.
4. Barkowitz P., Brigham J.C. Recognition of faces: Own-race bias, incentive, and time delay. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1982, 12:255-268.
5. Benjamin A.S., Bird R.D. Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:126-137.
6. Bennett-Day L.B. The role of processing strategy in the cross-race effect 2007, (Doctoral dissertation), (Retrieved from http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/1342).
7. Bernstein M.J., Young S.G., Hugenberg K. The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychological Science 2007, 18:706-712.
8. Brigham J.C., Williamson N.L. Cross-racial recognition and age: When you're over 60, do they still "all look alike?". Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 1979, 5:218-222.
9. Bui D.C., Friedman M.C., McDonough I.M., Castel A.D. False memory and importance: Can we prioritize encoding without consequence?. Memory & Cognition 2013, 41:1012-1020.
10. Castel A.D. The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: Evaluative processing and value-directed remembering. The psychology of learning and motivation 2008, Vol. 48:225-270. Academic Press, London.
11. Castel A.D., Balota D.A., McCabe D.P. Memory efficiency and the strategic control of attention at encoding: Impairments of value-directed remembering in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 2009, 23:297-306.
12. Castel A.D., Benjamin A.S., Craik F.I.M., Watkins M.J. The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:1078-1085.
13. Castel A.D., Farb N.A.S., Craik F.I.M. Memory for general and specific value information in younger and older adults: Measuring the limits of strategic control. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:689-700.
14. Castel A.D., Humphreys K.L., Lee S.S., Galván A., Balota D.A., McCabe D.P. The development of memory efficiency and value-directed remembering across the life span: A cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity. Developmental Psychology 2011, 47:1553-1564.
15. Castel A.D., Lee S.S., Humphreys K.L., Moore A.N. Memory capacity, selective control, and value-directed remembering in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neuropsychology 2010, 25:15-24.
16. Castel A.D., Murayama K., Friedman M.C., McGillivray S., Link I. Selecting valuable information to remember: Age-related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning. Psychology and Aging 2013, 28:232-242.
17. Castel A.D., Rhodes M.G., McCabe D.P., Soderstrom N.C., Loaiza V.M. The fate of being forgotten: information that is initially forgotten is judged as less important. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2012, 65:2281-2287.
18. Chiroro P.M., Tredoux C.G., Radaelli S., Meissner C.A. Recognizing faces across continents: The effect of within-race variations on the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:1089-1092.
19. DeLozier S., Dunlosky J. How do students improve their value-based learning with task experience?. Memory 2014, 10.1080/09658211.2014.938083.
20. Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1986, 115:107-117.
21. Dunlosky J., Thiede K.W. What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica 1998, 98:37-56.
22. Healy A.F., Kubovy M. The effects of payoffs and prior probabilities on indices of performance and cutoff locations in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 1978, 6:544-553.
23. Hehman E., Mania E.W., Gaertner S.L. Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:445-448.
24. Hills P.J., Lewis M.B. Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by shifting attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:996-1002.
25. Hourihan K.L., Fraundorf S.H., Benjamin A.S. Same faces, different labels: Generating the cross-race effect in face memory with social category information. Memory & Cognition 2013, 41:1-37.
26. Hugenberg K., Miller J., Claypool H.M. Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007, 43:334-340.
27. Hugenberg K., Sacco D.F. Social categorization and stereotyping: How social categorization biases person perception and face memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2008, 2:1052-1072.
28. Hugenberg K., Young S.G., Bernstein M.J., Sacco D.F. The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review 2010, 117:1168-1187.
29. Kassin S.M., Ellsworth P.C., Smith V.L. The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist 1989, 44:1089-1098.
30. Levin D.T. Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:559-574.
31. Lucas H.D., Chiao J.Y., Paller K.A. Why some faces won't be remembered: Brain potentials illuminate successful versus unsuccessful encoding for same-race and other-race faces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2011, 5:1-17.
32. Madan C.R., Spetch M.L. Is the enhancement of memory due to reward driven by value or salience?. Acta Psychologica 2012, 139:343-349.
33. Malpass R.S., Kravitz J. Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969, 13:330-334.
34. McGillivray S., Castel A.D. Betting on memory leads to metacognitive improvement by younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 2011, 26:137-142.
35. Meissner C.A., Brigham J.C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2001, 7:3-35.
36. Meissner C.A., Brigham J.C., Butz D.A. Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005, 19:545-567.
37. Metcalfe J., Kornell N. A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:463-477.
38. Nelson T.O., Leonesio R.J. Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect.". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:676-686.
39. Pauker K., Weisbuch M., Ambady N., Sommers S.R., Adams R.B., Ivcevic Z. Not so black and white: Memory for ambiguous group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:795-810.
40. Pezdek K., Blandon-Gitlin I., Moore C. Children's face recognition memory: More evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003, 88:760-763.
41. Ratcliff N.J., Hugenberg K., Shriver E.R., Bernstein M.J. The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 2011, 37:1003-1015.
42. Rhodes M.G., Anastasi J.S. The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 2012, 138:146-174.
43. Rhodes G., Brake S., Taylor K., Tan S. Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1989, 80:313-331.
44. Rhodes M.G., Jacoby L.L. On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: Effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:305-320.
45. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Taylor L., Hayward W.G., Ewing L. Individual differences in adaptive coding of face identity are linked to individual differences in face recognition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2014, 40:897-903.
46. Rhodes G., Lie H.C., Ewing L., Evangelista E., Tanaka J.W. Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:217-223.
47. Rhodes M.G., Sitzman D.M., Rowland C.A. Monitoring and control of learning own-race and other-race faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2013, 27:553-563.
48. Sangrigoli S., Pallier C., Argenti A.M., Ventureyra V.A.G., de Schonen S. Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science 2005, 16:440-444.
49. Shriver E.R., Hugenberg K. Power, individuation, and the cross-race recognition deficit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:767-774.
50. Shriver E.R., Young S.G., Hugenberg K., Bernstein M.J., Lanter J.R. Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34:260-274.
51. Soderstrom N.C., Bjork R.A. Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time. Journal of Memory and Language 2014, 73:99-115.
52. Soderstrom N.C., McCabe D.P. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: Evidence for agenda-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37:1236-1242.
53. Sporer S.L. Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2001, 7:36-97.
54. Stretch V., Wixted J.T. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1379-1396.
55. Thiede K.W., Dunlosky J. Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:1024-1037.
56. Tullis J.G., Benjamin A.S., Liu X. Self-pacing study of faces of different races: Metacognitive control over study does not eliminate the cross-race recognition effect. Memory & Cognition 2014, 42:863-875.
57. Watkins, M. J., & Bloom, L. C. (1999). Selectivity in memory: An exploration of willful control over the remembering process. Unpublished manuscript.
58. Wright D.B., Sladden B. An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica 2003, 114:101-114.
59. Young S.G., Hugenberg K. Individuation motivation and face experience can operate jointly to produce the own-race bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2012, 3:80-87.
60. Young S.G., Hugenberg K., Bernstein M.J., Sacco D.F. Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2012, 16:116-142.