When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 416-428

  Ariel, Robert ^a   Dunlosky, John ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agenda based regulation; Habitual responding; Item selection; Self regulated study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; READING; REWARD; TIME; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE;

ADULT; HUMANS; LEARNING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; READING; REWARD; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875022786     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0267-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ariel, R., Al-Harthy, I. S., Was, C. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 1015-1021. doi: 10. 3758/s13423-011-0128-3.
2. Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138, 432-447. doi: 10. 1037/a0015928.
3. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1-15.
4. Castel, A. D. (2007). The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: Evaluative processing and value-directed remembering. In A. S. Benjamin & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Skill and strategy in memory use (Vol. 48, pp. 225-270). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. Castel, A. D., Balota, D. A., & McCabe, D. P. (2009). Memory efficiency and the strategic control of attention at encoding: Impairments of value-directed remembering in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 23, 297-306.
6. Castel, A. D., Benjamin, A. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (2002). The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1078-1085. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194325.
7. Castel, A. D., Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., & Moore, A. N. (2011). Memory capacity, selective control, and value-directed remembering in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychology, 25, 15-24.
8. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
9. De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428-433.
10. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
11. Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011a). The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 899-912. doi: 10. 1037/a0023064.
12. Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011b). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 103-140). San Diego: Academic Press.
13. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect people's self-paced study and yield "labor-and-gain" effects. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37-56.
14. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control study. Memory and Cognition, 32, 779-788.
15. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2003. 08. 012.
16. Evans, J. S. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 11, 382-389.
17. Evans, J. S. B. T., & Frankish, K. (Eds.). (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Hayes-Roth, B., & Hayes-Roth, F. (1979). A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science, 3, 275-310.
19. Isbell, L. M., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1999). Correcting for mood-induced bias in evaluations of political candidates: The roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 237-249.
20. Kahneman, D., & Peavler, W. S. (1969). Incentive effects and pupillary changes in association learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 312-318. doi: 10. 1037/h0026912.
21. Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 139, 665-682.
22. Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 131, 349-363. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 131. 3. 349.
23. Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 159-163. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8721. 2009. 01628. x.
24. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 463-477.
25. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3-19.
26. Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 676-686. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 14. 4. 676.
27. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration-likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
28. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). New York: Academic Press.
29. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
30. Price, J., & Murray, R. G. (2012). The region of proximal learning heuristic and adult age differences in self-regulated learning. Psychology and Aging. doi: 10. 1037/a0029860.
31. Roberts, M. J., & Newton, E. J. (2002). Inspection times, the change task, and the rapid-response selection task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1031-1048.
32. Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., & Handley, S. (2003). In search of counter-examples: Deductive rationality in human reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 1129-1145.
33. Soderstrom, N. C., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: Evidence for agenda-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1236-1242.
34. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221.
35. Teasdale, J. D. (1999). Multi-level theories of cognition-emotion relations. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 665-681). Chichester: Wiley.
36. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
37. van Reekum, C. M., & Scherer, K. R. (1997). Levels of processing for emotion-antecedent appraisal. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion (pp. 259-300). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., & Duggan, G. B. (2011). The influence of goal-state access cost on planning during problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 485-503. doi: 10. 1080/17470218. 2010. 507276.
39. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.