Comparison of an interactive e-learning preparatory tool and a conventional downloadable handout used within a flipped neurologic pharmacotherapy lecture

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 12-19

  McLaughlin, Jacqueline E ^a   Rhoney, Denise H ^a  

^a University of North Carolina   (United States)

Author keywords

e Learning; Flipped classroom; Neurology; Pharmacotherapy; Seizure

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COURSE EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 84916228016     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2014.09.016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Garrison R., Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ 2004, 7(2):95-105.
2. Bergmann J., Sams A. Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student In Every Class Every Day 2012, International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, OR.
3. Prober C.G., Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures-a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med 2012, 366(18):1657-1659.
4. McLaughlin J.E., Roth M.T., Glatt D.M., et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med 2014, 89(2):236-243.
5. Zimmerman B.J. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educ Psychol 1990, 25(1):3-17.
6. A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives 2001, Longman, New York, NY. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl (Eds.).
7. Persky A. Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics. Am J Pharm Educ 2008, 72(2). Article 36.
8. Pierce R., Fox J. Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a "flipped classroom" model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. Am J Pharm Educ 2012, 76(10). Article 196.
9. Clauson K.A., Vidal D.M. Overview of biomedical journal podcasts. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008, 65(22):2155-2158.
10. Hew K.F. Use of audio podcast in K-12 and higher education: a review of research topics and methodologies. Educ Technol Res Dev 2009, 57(3):333-357.
11. Maleck M., Fischer M.R., Kammer B., et al. Do computers teach better? A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology. Radiographics 2001, 21(4):1025-1032.
12. Kavadella A., Tsiklakis K., Vougiouklakis G., Lionarakis A. Evaluation of a blended learning course for teaching oral radiology to undergraduate dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2012, 16(1):e88-e95.
13. Critz C.M., Knight D. Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education. Nurs Educ 2013, 38(5):210.
14. Ruiz J.G., Mintzer M.J., Leipzig R.M. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006, 81(3):207-212.
15. Sancho P., Corral R., Rivas T., et al. A blended learning experience for teaching microbiology. Am J Pharm Educ 2006, 70(5). Article 120.
16. Wilson A.S., Goodall J.E., Ambrosini G., et al. Development of an interactive learning tool for teaching rheumatology-a simulated clinical case studies program. Rheumatology 2006, 45(9):1158-1161.
17. Ghosh S., Pandya H.V. Implementation of integrated learning program in neurosciences during first year of traditional medical course: perception of students and faculty. BMC Med Educ 2008, 8(1):44.
18. Woltering V., Herrler A., Spitzer K., Spreckelsen C. Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009, 14(5):725-738.
19. Siemens G Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Accessed October 23, 2014. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm.
20. Deslauriers L., Schelew E., Wieman C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 2011, 332(6031):862-864.
21. Lage M.J., Platt G.J., Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ 2000, 31(1):30-43.
22. Sakai. Accessed July 15, 2014. http://www.sakaiproject.org.
23. Roediger H.L., Butler A.C. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cogn Sci 2011, 15(1):20-27.
24. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows [computer program]. Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2012.
25. McLaughlin J.E., Griffin L.M., Esserman D.A., et al. Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. Am J Pharm Educ 2013, 77(9). Article 196.
26. McLaughlin J.E., Khanova J., Gharkholonareh N., et al. Blended learning in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: student engagement, performance, and perception. Am J Pharm Educ 2014, (In press).
27. Ross S.M., Morrison G.R., Lowther D.L. Educational technology research past and present: balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemp Educ Technol 2010, 1(1):7-35.