Channel Choice, Justification of Deception, and Detection

Journal of Communication

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1139-1159

  Van Swol, Lyn M ^a   Braun, Michael T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; Demeanor; Detection; Lies; Nonverbal cues; Omission

Indexed keywords

EID: 84914817616     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12125     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone-especially ourselves. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
2. Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2.
4. Burgoon, J. K., & Buller, D. B. (2004). Interpersonal deception theory. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Readings in persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 239-264). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Burgoon, J. K., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Advances in deception detection. In S. Smith & S. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication (pp. 201-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation, and emotion. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(1), 54-59.
7. DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.
8. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
9. George, J. F., Marett, K., & Tilley, P. (2004). Deception detection under varying electronic media and warning conditions. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 9-17.
10. Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445-459. doi:10.1037/a0026406.
11. Grazioli, S., & Jarvenpaa, S. (2000). Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 395-410.
12. Hancock, J. T. (2007). Digital deception: When, where and how people lie online. In K. McKenna, T. Postmes, U. Reips, & A. N. Joinson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 287-301). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13. Hancock, J. T., Thom-Santelli, J., & Ritchie, T. (2004). Deception and design: The impact of communication technologies on lying behavior. Proceedings, Conference on Computer Human Interaction, 6, 130-136.
14. Huck, A. (1999). Responder behavior in ultimatum games with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 183-206. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00004-5.
15. Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
16. Kim, H., Schnall, S., Yi, D. J., & White, M. P. (2013). Social distance decreases responders' sensitivity to fairness in the ultimatum game. Judgment and Decision-Making, 8, 632-638.
17. Levine, T. (2001). Dichotomous and continuous views of deception: A reexamination of deception ratings in information manipulation theory. Communication Research Reports, 18, 230-240.
18. Levine, T. (2010). A few transparent liars. Communication Yearbook, 34, 41-59.
19. Levine, T. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 378-392. doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916.
20. Levine, T. R., Kim, R. K., & Blair, J. P. (2010). (In)accuracy at detecting true and false confessions and denials: An initial test of a projected motive model of veracity judgments. Human Communication Research, 36, 81-101.
21. Levine, T. R., Serota, K. B., Shulman, H., Clare, D. D., Park, H. S., Shaw, A. S., . . . Lee, J. H. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgments. Human Communication Research, 37, 377-403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01407.x.
22. Marett, L. K., & George, J. F. (2004). Deception in the case of one sender and multiple receivers. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 29-44.
23. McCornack, S. (1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 1-16. doi:10.1080/03637759209376245.
24. McCornack, S., Morrison, K., Paik, J. E., Wisner, A. M., & Zhu, X. (2014). Information manipulation theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 348-377. doi:10.1177/0261927X14534656.
25. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263-277. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960030404.
26. Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Boster, F. J. (2010). The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies in self-reported lies. Human Communication Research, 36, 2-25. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01366.x.
27. Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Barrios-Choplin, J. R. (1992). A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations. Human Communication Research, 18, 563-598.
28. Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421-446.
29. Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1-34.
30. Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76-105. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T.
31. Straub, P., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offer. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 345-364. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)00072-M.
32. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17, 223-236. doi:10.1023/B:SORE.0000027411.35832.53.
33. Valenzuela, A., & Srivastava, J. (2012). Role of information asymmetry and situational salience in reducing intergroup bias: The case of ultimatum games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1671-1683. doi:10.1177/0146167212458327.
34. Van Swol, L. M., Braun, M. T., & Kolb, M. R. (2014). Deception, detection, demeanor, and truth bias in face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Communication Research Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650213485785.
35. Van Swol, L. M., Malhotra, D., & Braun, M. T. (2012). Deception and its detection: Effects of monetary incentives and personal relationship history. Communication Research, 39, 217-238. doi:10.1177/0093650210396868.
36. Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2011). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89-121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861.
37. Wang, L., & Murnighan, J. K. (2012). On greed. The Academy of Management Journal, 5, 279-316.
38. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
39. Whitty, M. T., & Carville, S. E. (2008). Would I lie to you? Self-serving lies and other oriented lies told across different media. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1021-1031. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.004.