Dichotomous and continuous views of deception: A reexamination of deception ratings in information manipulation theory

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 230-240

  Levine, Timothy R ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010634970     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090109384803     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., and Mullett, J., 1990. Equivocal communication, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Bok, S., 1989. Lying: Moral choice in public and private life, NY: Vintage.
3. Bowers, J.W., Elliott, N.D., and Desmond, R.J., 1977. Exploiting pragmatic rules: Devious messages. Human Communication Research, 3: 235–242.
4. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Ebesu, A. S., and Rockwell, P., 1994. Interpersonal deception V: Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61: 303–325.
5. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Guerrero, L. K., Afifi, W. A., and Feldman, C. M., 1996. Interpersonal deception: XII. Information management dimensions underlying deceptive and truthful messages. Communication Monographs, 63: 50–69.
6. Ekman, P., 1966. Telling lies, New York: Berkeley.
7. DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., and Muhlenbruck, L., 1996. The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Review, 1: 346–357.
8. Galasinski, D., 2000. The language of deception: A discourse analytical study, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Grice, P., 1989. Studies in the way of words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Hopper, R., and Bell, R. A., 1984. Broadening the deception construct. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70: 288–302.
11. Lapinski, M. K., 1995. Deception and the self: A cultural examination of Information Manipulation Theory, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii. Unpublished master's thesis.
12. Lapinski, M. K., and Levine, T. R., 2000. Culture and information manipulation theory: The effects of self construal and locus of benefit on information manipulation. Communication Studies, 51: 55–74.
13. Levine, T. R., 1998. Modeling the psychometric properties of information manipulation ratings. Communication Research Reports, 15: 218–225.
14. McCornack, S.A., 1992. Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59: 1–16.
15. McCornack, S. A., and Levine, T. R., 1990. When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception. Communication Monographs, 57: 119–138.
16. McCornack, S. A., Levine, T. R., Morrison, K., and Lapinski, M., 1996. Speaking of information manipulation: A critical rejoinder. Communication Monographs, 63: 83–91.
17. McCornack, S. A., Levine, T. A., Solowczuk, K. A., Torres, H. I., and Campbell, D. M., 1992. When the alteration of information is viewed as deception: An empirical test of information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59: 17–29.
18. Miller, G. R., and Stiff, J. B., 1993. Deceptive Communication, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Murai, J., 1998. Perceived deceptiveness of verbal messages: An examination of Information Manipulation Theory. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 69: 401–407.
20. Turner, R. E., Edgley, C., and Olmstead, G., 1975. Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11: 69–89.
21. Yeung, L. N. T., Levine, T.R., and Nishiyama, K., 1999. Information manipulation theory and perceptions of deception in Hong Kong. Communication Reports, 12: 1–11.
22. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., and Rosenthal, R., 1981. “ Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception ”. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Edited by: Berkowitz, L., Vol. 14, 1–59. New York: Academic Press.