Assessing Higher Level Learning: Developing Rubrics for Case Analysis

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 258-265

  Rochford, Linda ^a   Borchert, Patricia S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; case analysis; higher level learning; learning outcomes; rubrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84914816147     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2010.512319     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Association to Advance Colleges of Business International. 2008. Accredited U.S. schools as of April 2008, Tampa, FL: AACSB International. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/accreditedmembers.asp
2. Bloom, B., 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, New York, NY: David McKay.
3. Bok, D., 2005. Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bonomo, T., and Kosnik, T., 1989. Learning by the case method in marketing, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
5. Diamond, N., Koernig, S. K., and Iqbal, Z., 2008. Uniting active and deep learning to teach problem solving skills. Journal of Marketing Education, 30: 116–129.
6. Henson, S. W., Kennett, P. A., and Kennedy, K. N., 2003. Web-based cases in strategic marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 25: 250–259.
7. Karns, G. L., 2005. An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27: 163–171.
8. Klebba, J. M., and Hamilton, J. G., 2007. Structured case analysis: Developing critical thinking skills in a marketing case course. Journal of Marketing Education, 29: 132–139.
9. Krathwohl, D. R., 2002. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41: 212–219.
10. Markulis, P., 2007. From case presentation to case facilitation: How assessment changed the capstone course. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 34: 85–92.
11. Martell, K., and Calderon, T., 2005. “ Assessment in business schools: What it is, where we are, and where we need to go ”. In Assessment of student learning in business schools: Best practices each step of the way, Edited by: Martell, K., and Calderon, T., 1–26. Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research. Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp.
12. McKinsey. 2008. Careers. Case interview Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/careers/how_do_i_apply/how_to_do_well_in_the_interview/case_interview.aspx
13. Moskal, B. M., 2000. Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7 (3) Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3
14. Moskal, B. M., and Leydens, J. A., 2000. Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7 (10) Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=10
15. Pariseau, S. E., and Kezim, B., 2007. The effect of using case studies in business statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 83: 27–31.
16. Peach, B. E., Mukherjee, A., and Hornyak, M., 2007. Assessing critical thinking: A college's journey and lessons learned. Journal of Education for Business, 82: 313–320.
17. Petkov, D., and Petkova, O., 2006. Development of scoring rubrics for IS projects as an assessment tool. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3: 499–510.
18. Popper, E. T. L., 2005. “ Learning goals: The foundation of curriculum development and assessment ”. In Assessment of student learning in business schools: Best practices each step of the way, Edited by: Martell, K., and Calderon, T., 1–23. Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research. Vol. 1, Issue 2, pp.
19. Raffoni, M., 1999. Use case interviewing to improve your hiring. Harvard Management Update, 4 (7): 10
20. Reeves, M. F., 1990. An application of Bloom's taxonomy to the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 609–616.
21. Ven, J., and Chuang, C., 2005. The comparative study of information competencies: Using Bloom's taxonomy. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 7: 136–143.
22. Walstad, W. B., and Saunders, P., 1998. Teaching undergraduate economics, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23. White, C. S., 2007. Levels of understanding: A guide to the teaching and assessment of knowledge. Journal of Business Education, 82: 159–163.
24. Wiggins, G., 1998. Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Zouaq, A., Nkambou, R., and Frassen, C., 2007. An integrated approach for automatic aggregation of learning knowledge objects. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3: 135–163.