MEG source reconstruction based on identification of directed source interactions on whole-brain anatomical networks

NeuroImage

Volumn 105, Issue , 2015, Pages 408-427

  Fukushima, Makoto ^a,b   Yamashita, Okito ^b,d   Knösche, Thomas R ^c   Sato, Masa aki ^b  

^a NARA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

^c National Institute of Information and Communications Technology   (Japan)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anatomical connectivity; Effective connectivity; MEG source reconstruction; Multivariate autoregressive model; Prior knowledge; Variational Bayes

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NERVE NET;

EID: 84914128944     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.066     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Attias H. Inferring parameters and structure of latent variable models by variational Bayes. Proc. 15th Conf. Uncertain. Artif. Intell. 1999, 21-30.
2. Baillet S., Garnero L. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 44:374-385.
3. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2001, 18:14-30.
4. Barber D., Chiappa S. Unified inference for variational Bayesian linear Gaussian state-space models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 19 (NIPS 2006) 2007, 81-88.
5. Beal M.J. Variational algorithm for approximate Bayesian inference 2003, (Ph.D. thesis), Univ. College London, London, UK.
6. Bolstad A., Van Veen B.D., Nowak R. Space-time event sparse penalization for magneto-/electroencephalography. Neuroimage 2009, 46:1066-1081.
7. Brookes M.J., Hale J.R., Zumer J.M., Stevenson C.M., Francis S.T., Barnes G.R., Owen J.P., Morris P.G., Nagarajan S.S. Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1082-1104.
8. Cheung B.L.P., Riedner B.A., Tononi G., Van Veen B.D. Estimation of cortical connectivity from EEG using state-space models. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57:2122-2134.
9. Dalal S.S., Zumer J.M., Guggisberg A.G., Trumpis M., Wong D.D.E., Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S. MEG/EEG source reconstruction, statistical evaluation, and visualization with NUTMEG. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011.
10. Dale A., Liu A., Fischl B., Buckner R. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 2000, 26:55-67.
11. Dannhauer M., Lämmel E., Wolters C.H., Knösche T.R. Spatio-temporal regularization in linear distributed source reconstruction from EEG/MEG: a critical evaluation. Brain Topogr. 2013, 26:229-246.
12. Daunizeau J., Friston K.J. A mesostate-space model for EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 2007, 38:67-81.
13. Daunizeau J., Mattout J., Clonda D., Goulard B., Benali H., Lina J.M. Bayesian spatio-temporal approach for EEG source reconstruction: conciliating ECD and distributed models. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 53:503-516.
14. Daunizeau J., Grova C., Marrelec G., Mattout J., Jbabdi S., Pélégrini-Issac M., Lina J.M., Benali H. Symmetrical event-related EEG/fMRI information fusion in a variational Bayesian framework. Neuroimage 2007, 36:69-87.
15. David O., Friston K. A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1743-1755.
16. David O., Harrison L., Friston K. Modelling event-related responses in the brain. Neuroimage 2005, 25:756-770.
17. David O., Kiebel S., Harrison L., Mattout J., Kilner J., Friston K. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1255-1272.
18. Davies-Thompson J., Andrews T.J. Intra- and interhemispheric connectivity between face-selective regions in the human brain. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:3087-3095.
19. de Pasquale F., Della Penna S., Snyder A.Z., Marzetti L., Pizzella V., Romani G.L., Corbetta M. A cortical core for dynamic integration of functional networks in the resting human brain. Neuron 2012, 74:753-764.
20. Deco G., Jirsa V., McIntosh A.R., Sporns O., Kötter R. Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:10302-10307.
21. Fairhall S.L., Ishai A. Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2400-2406.
22. Friston K.J. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1994, 2:56-78.
23. Friston K.J., Harrison L.M., Penny W.D. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1273-1302.
24. Friston K.J., Harrison L.M., Daunizeau J., Kiebel S.J., Phillips C., Trujillo-Barreto N.J., Henson R., Flandin G., Mattout J. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage 2008, 39:1104-1120.
25. Fukushima M., Yamashita O., Kanemura A., Ishii S., Kawato M., Sato M. A state-space modeling approach for localization of focal current sources from MEG. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59:1561-1571.
26. Galka A., Yamashita O., Ozaki T., Biscay R., Valdés-Sosa P. A solution to the dynamical inverse problem of EEG generation using spatiotemporal Kalman filtering. Neuroimage 2004, 23:435-453.
27. Ghosh A., Rho Y., McIntosh A., Kötter R., Jirsa V. Noise during rest enables the exploration of the brain's dynamic repertoire. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4:e1000196.
28. Goodale M.A., Milner A. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992, 15:20-25.
29. Grova C., Daunizeau J., Lina J.M., Bénar C.G., Benali H., Gotman J. Evaluation of EEG localization methods using realistic simulations of interictal spikes. Neuroimage 2006, 29:734-753.
30. Gschwind M., Pourtois G., Schwartz S., Van De Ville D., Vuilleumier P. White-matter connectivity between face-responsive regions in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 22:1564-1576.
31. Hämäläinen M.S., Ilmoniemi R.J. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1994, 32:35-42.
32. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65:413-497.
33. Haxby J., Horwitz B., Ungerleider L., Maisog J., Pietrini P., Grady C. The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14:6336-6353.
34. Haxby J., Hoffman E., Gobbini M. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:223-233.
35. Henson R.N., Flandin G., Friston K.J., Mattout J. A parametric empirical Bayesian framework for fMRI-constrained MEG/EEG source reconstruction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:1512-1531.
36. Henson R.N., Wakeman D.G., Litvak V., Friston K.J. A parametric empirical Bayesian framework for the EEG/MEG inverse problem: generative models for multi-subject and multi-modal integration. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2011, 5:1-16.
37. Hillebrand A., Barnes G.R. A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. Neuroimage 2002, 16:638-650.
38. Hipp J.F., Hawellek D.J., Corbetta M., Siegel M., Engel A.K. Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:884-892.
39. Honey C.J., Kötter R., Breakspear M., Sporns O. Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:10240-10245.
40. Hui H.B., Pantazis D., Bressler S.L., Leahy R.M. Identifying true cortical interactions in MEG using the nulling beamformer. Neuroimage 2010, 49:3161-3174.
41. Hutchison R.M., Womelsdorf T., Allen E.A., Bandettini P.A., Calhoun V.D., Corbetta M., Della Penna S., Duyn J.H., Glover G.H., Gonzalez-Castillo J., Handwerker D.A., Keilholz S., Kiviniemi V., Leopold D.A., de Pasquale F., Sporns O., Walter M., Chang C. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 2013, 80:360-378.
42. Jansen B., Rit V. Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biol. Cybern. 1995, 366:357-366.
43. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:4302-4311.
44. Lamus C., Hämäläinen M.S., Temereanca S., Brown E.N., Purdon P.L. A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem. Neuroimage 2012, 63:894-909.
45. Matsuura K., Okabe Y. Selective minimum-norm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1995, 42:608-615.
46. Mosher J.C., Lewis P.S., Leahy R.M. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1992, 39:541-557.
47. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M., Lewis P.S. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 46:245-259.
48. Neal R.M. Bayesian learning for neural networks 1996, Springer, New York.
49. Nummenmaa A., Auranen T., Hämäläinen M.S., Jääskeläinen I.P., Sams M., Vehtari A., Lampinen J. Automatic relevance determination based hierarchical Bayesian MEG inversion in practice. Neuroimage 2007, 37:876-889.
50. Nunez P.L., Srinivasan R. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
51. Olier I., Trujillo-Barreto N.J., El-Deredy W. A switching multi-scale dynamical network model of EEG/MEG. Neuroimage 2013, 81:262-287.
52. Ou W., Hämäläinen M.S., Golland P. A distributed spatio-temporal EEG/MEG inverse solver. Neuroimage 2009, 44:932-946.
53. Ou W., Nummenmaa A., Ahveninen J., Belliveau J.W., Hämäläinen M.S., Golland P. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation. Neuroimage 2010, 52:97-108.
54. Owen J.P., Wipf D.P., Attias H.T., Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S. Accurate reconstruction of brain activity and functional connectivity from noisy MEG data. Conf. Proc. 31st IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc 2009, 65-68.
55. Owen J.P., Wipf D.P., Attias H.T., Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S. Performance evaluation of the Champagne source reconstruction algorithm on simulated and real M/EEG data. Neuroimage 2012, 60:305-323.
56. Palva S., Palva J.M. Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges and breakthroughs. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:219-230.
57. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 24:5-12.
58. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1994, 18:49-65.
59. Portin K., Vanni S., Virsu V., Hari R. Stronger occipital cortical activation to lower than upper visual field stimuli. Neuromagnetic recordings. Exp. Brain Res. 1999, 124:287-294.
60. Pyles J.A., Verstynen T.D., Schneider W., Tarr M.J. Explicating the face perception network with white matter connectivity. PLoS One 2013, 8:e61611.
61. Sato M. Online model selection based on the variational Bayes. Neural Comput. 2001, 13:1649-1681.
62. Sato M., Yoshioka T., Kajihara S., Toyama K., Goda N., Doya K., Kawato M. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem. Neuroimage 2004, 23:806-826.
63. Scherg M., Von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985, 62:32-44.
64. Schmitt U., Louis A.K., Darvas F., Buchner H., Fuchs M. Numerical aspects of spatio-temporal current density reconstruction from EEG-/MEG-data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2001, 20:314-324.
65. Schoffelen J.M., Gross J. Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:1857-1865.
66. Sekihara K., Sahani M., Nagarajan S.S. Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. Neuroimage 2005, 25:1056-1067.
67. Spiegler A., Kiebel S.J., Atay F.M., Knösche T.R. Bifurcation analysis of neural mass models: impact of extrinsic inputs and dendritic time constants. Neuroimage 2010, 52:1041-1058.
68. Stephan K.E., Tittgemeyer M., Knösche T.R., Moran R.J., Friston K.J. Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 2009, 47:1628-1638.
69. Taulu S., Simola J. Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006, 51:1759-1768.
70. Tononi G., Sporns O., Edelman G.M. A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:5033-5037.
71. Tournier J., Calamante F., Connelly A. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 2007, 35:1459-1472.
72. Trujillo-Barreto N.J., Aubert-Vázquez E., Penny W.D. Bayesian M/EEG source reconstruction with spatio-temporal priors. Neuroimage 2008, 39:318-335.
73. Uutela K., Hämäläinen M., Somersalo E. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. Neuroimage 1999, 10:173-180.
74. Van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 44:867-880.
75. Wipf D., Nagarajan S.S. A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging. Neuroimage 2009, 44:947-966.
76. Wipf D.P., Owen J.P., Attias H.T., Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S. Robust Bayesian estimation of the location, orientation, and time course of multiple correlated neural sources using MEG. Neuroimage 2010, 49:641-655.
77. Woolrich M.W., Stephan K.E. Biophysical network models and the human connectome. Neuroimage 2013, 80:330-338.
78. Yamashita O., Galka A., Ozaki T., Biscay R., Valdés-Sosa P. Recursive penalized least squares solution for dynamical inverse problems of EEG generation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 21:221-235.
79. Yoshioka T., Toyama K., Kawato M., Yamashita O., Nishina S., Yamagishi N., Sato M. Evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian method through retinotopic brain activities reconstruction from fMRI and MEG signals. Neuroimage 2008, 42:1397-1413.