Automatic relevance determination based hierarchical Bayesian MEG inversion in practice

NeuroImage

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 876-889

  Nummenmaa, Aapo ^a   Auranen, Toni ^a   Hämäläinen, Matti S ^b,c   Jääskeläinen, Iiro P ^a   Sams, Mikko ^a   Vehtari, Aki ^a   Lampinen, Jouko ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic relevance determination; Hierarchical modeling; Inverse problem; MEG; Variational Bayes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMPIRICISM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED;

EID: 34547830373     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Auranen, T., Nummenmaa, A., Hämäläinen, M.S., Jääskeläinen, I.P., Lampinen, J., Vehtari, A., Sams. M., in press. Bayesian inverse analysis of neuromagnetic data using cortically constrained multiple dipoles. Hum. Brain Mapp.
2. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., and Leahy R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. (2001) 14-30
3. Berger J.O. Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. second edition (1985), Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
4. Bernardo J.M., and Smith A.F.M. Bayesian Theory (2000), John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
5. Dale A.M., and Sereno M.I. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5 2 (1993) 162-176
6. Dale A.M., Fischl B., and Sereno M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 9 (1999) 179-194
7. Dale A.M., Liu A.K., Fischl B.R., Buckner R.L., Belliveau J.W., Lewine J.D., and Halgren E. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26 (2000) 55-67
8. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., and Dale A.M. Cortical surface-based analysis II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 9 (1999) 195-207
9. Gelman A. Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Anal. 1 3 (2006) 515-534
10. Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H.S., and Rubin D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis. second edition (2003), Chapman and Hall/CRC
11. Geweke J. Bayesian treatment of the independent Student-t linear model. J. Appl. Econ. 8 (1993) S19-S40 (Supplement)
12. Ghahramani Z., and Beal M. Graphical models and variational methods. In: Opper M., and Saad D. (Eds). Advanced Mean Field Methods-Theory and Practice (2001), MIT Press
13. Hansen P.C. Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Rev. 34 4 (1992) 561-580
14. Hämäläinen, M.S., Ilmoniemi, R.J., 1984. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University of Technology, Department of Technical Physics.
15. Hämäläinen M.S., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., and Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Modern Phys. 65 2 (1993)
16. Jun S.C., George J.S., Paré-Blagoev J., Plis S.M., Ranken D.M., Schmidt D.M., and Wood C.C. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data. NeuroImage 28 1 (2005) 84-98
17. Kaipio J.P., and Somersalo E. Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, volume 160 of Applied Mathematical Sciences (2005), Springer
18. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M., and Lewis P.S. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 3 (1999)
19. Neal R.M. Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks (1996), Springer-Verlag
20. Nummenmaa, A., Auranen, T., Hämäläinen, M.S., Jääskeläinen, I.P., Lampinen, J., Sams, M., Vehtari, A., in press. Hierarchical Bayesian estimates of distributed MEG sources: theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and MCMC methods. NeuroImage, http://www.lce.hut.fi/nummenma/papers/Nummenmaa_2006_NI.pdf.
21. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 24 (2002) 5-12
22. Plis, S.M., George, J.S., Jun, S.C., Paré-Blagoev, J., Ranken, D.M., Schmidt, D.M., Wood, C.C., 2005. Spatiotemporal noise covariance model for MEG/EEG data source analysis. Technical Report LAUR-043643, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
23. Robert C.P., and Casella G. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. second edition (2004), Springer
24. Sato M.-A., Yoshioka T., Kajihara S., Toyama K., Goda N., Doya K., and Kawato M. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem. NeuroImage 23 (2004) 806-826
25. Trujillo-Barreto N.J., Aubert-Vázquez E., and Valdés-Sosa P.A. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging. NeuroImage 21 (2004) 1300-1319