Sex chromosome mosaicism and hybrid speciation among tiger swallowtail butterflies

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Kunte, Krushnamegh ^a,b   Shea, Cristina ^b   Aardema, Matthew L ^c   Scriber, J Mark ^d   Juenger, Thomas E ^a   Gilbert, Lawrence E ^a   Kronforst, Marcus R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAPAUSE; FEMALE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE FLOW; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INHERITANCE; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NORTH AMERICA; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PAPILIO APPALACHIENSIS; PAPILIO CANADENSIS; PAPILIO GLAUCUS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PUPA (LIFE CYCLE STAGE); SEX CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; SEX LINKAGE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; THERMODYNAMICS; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; CHIMERA; ECOSYSTEM; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOSAICISM; POPULATION; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

PAPILIO; PAPILIO CANADENSIS; PAPILIO GLAUCUS; PAPILIONIDAE;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CHIMERA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC SPECIATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MOSAICISM; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POPULATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX CHROMOSOMES;

EID: 80053451826     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002274     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, et al. (2003) Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301: 1211-1216.
2. Lewontin RC, Birch LC, (1966) Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20: 315-336.
3. Mallet J, (2007) Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279-283.
4. Mallet J, (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 229-237.
5. Coyne JA, Orr HA, (2004) Speciation. Sunderland, Massachusetts Sinauer Associates.
6. Gompert Z, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Shapiro AM, Nice CC, (2006) Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science 314: 1923-1925.
7. Mavarez J, Salazar CA, Bermingham E, Salcedo C, Jiggins CD, et al. (2006) Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441: 868-871.
8. Nolte AW, Tautz D, (2010) Understanding the onset of hybrid speciation. Trends Gen 26: 54-58.
9. Gross BL, Rieseberg LH, (2005) The ecological genetics of homoploid hybrid speciation. J Heredity 96: 241-252.
10. Salazar C, Baxter SW, Pardo-Diaz C, Wu G, Surridge A, et al. (2010) Genetic evidence for hybrid trait speciation in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genet 6: e1000930 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000930.
11. Mavarez J, Linares M, (2008) Homoploid hybrid speciation in animals. Mol Ecol 17: 4181-4185.
12. Deering MD, Scriber JM, (2002) Field bioassays show heterospecific mating preference asymmetry between hybridizing North American Papilio butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J Ethol 20: 25-33.
13. Scriber JM, Deering M, Stump A, (2003) Hybrid zone ecology and tiger swallowtail trait clines in North America. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR, editors. Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight Chicago University of Chicago Press pp. 367-391.
14. Scriber JM, Lederhouse RC, Dowell RV, (1995) Hybridization studies with North American swallowtails. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC, editors. Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Gainesville, Florida Scientific Publishers, Inc pp. 269-281.
15. Hagen RH, Scriber JM, (1995) Sex chromosomes and speciation in tiger swallowtails. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC, editors. Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Gainesville, Florida Scientific Publishers, Inc. pp. 211-227.
16. Mercader RJ, Scriber JM, (2008) Asymmetrical thermal constraints on the parapatric species boundaries of two widespread generalist butterflies. Ecol Entomol 33: 537-545.
17. Lederhouse RC, Ayres MP, Scriber JM, (1995) Physiological and behavioral adaptations to variable thermal environments in North American swalowtail butterflies. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC, editors. Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Gainesville, Florida Scientific Publishers, Inc pp. 71-81.
18. Scriber JM, Lederhouse RC, (1992) The thermal environment as a resource dictating geographic patterns of feeding specialization of insect herbivores. In: Hunter MR, Ohgushi T, Price PW, editors. Effects of Resource Distribution on Animal-Plant Interactions San Diego, California Academic Press pp. 429-466.
19. Lindroth RL, Scriber JM, Hsia MTS, (1986) Differential responses of tiger swallowtail subspecies to secondary metabolites from tulip tree and quaking aspen. Oecologia 70: 13-19.
20. Mercader RJ, Aardema ML, Scriber JM, (2009) Hybridization leads to host-use divergence in a polyphagous butterfly sibiling species pair. Oecologia 158: 651-662.
21. Mercader RJ, Scriber JM, (2007) Diversification of host use in two polyphagous butterflies: differences in oviposition specificity or host rank hierarchy. Ent Exp Appl 125: 89-101.
22. Bossart JL, Scriber JM, (1995) Genetic variation in oviposition preference in tiger swallowtail butterflies: interspecific, interpopulation and interindividual comparisons. In: Scriber JM, Tsubaki Y, Lederhouse RC, editors. Swallowtail Butterflies: Their Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Gainesville, Florida Scientific Publishers, Inc pp. 183-193.
23. Ritland DB, Scriber JM, (1985) Larval developmental rates of three subspecies of tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus, and their hybrids in relation to temperature. Oecologia 65: 185-193.
24. Scriber JM, Lindroth RL, Nitao JK, (1989) Differential toxicity of a phenolic glycoside from quaking aspen to Papilio glaucus butterfly subspecies, hybrids and backcrosses. Oecologia 81: 186-191.
25. Hagen RH, Lederhouse RC, Bossart JL, Scriber JM, (1991) Papilio canadensis and P. glaucus (Papilionidae) are distinct species. J Lep Soc 45: 245-258.
26. Scriber JM, Hagen RH, Lederhouse RC, (1996) Genetics of mimicry in the tiger swallowtail butterflies, Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Evolution 50: 222-236.
27. Putnam AS, Scriber JM, Andolfatto P, (2007) Discordant divergence times among Z-chromosome regions between two ecologically distinct swallowtail butterfly species. Evolution 61: 912-927.
28. Luebke HJ, Scriber JM, Yandell BS, (1988) Use of Multivariate Discriminant Analysis of male wing morphometrics to delineate a hybrid zone for Papilio glaucus glaucus and P. g. canadensis in Wisconsin. Amer Midland Natur 119: 366-379.
29. Hagen RH, Scriber JM, (1989) Sex-linked diapause, color, and allozyme loci in Papilio glaucus: linkage analysis and significance in a hybrid zone. J Heredity 80: 179-185.
30. Ries L, Mullen SP, (2008) A rare model limits the distribution of its more common mimic: A twist on frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Evolution 62: 1798-1803.
31. Kunte K, (2009) Female-limited mimetic polymorphism: A review of theories and a critique of sexual selection as balancing selection. Anim Behav 78: 1029-1036.
32. Brower JVZ, (1958) Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies: Part II. Battus philenor and Papilio troilus, P. polyxenes and P. glaucus. Evolution 12: 123-136.
33. Brower LP, Brower JVZ, (1962) The relative abundance of model and mimic butterflies in natural populations of the Battus philenor mimicry complex. Ecology 43: 154-158.
34. Burns JM, (1966) Preferential mating versus mimicry: Disruptive selection and sex-limited dimorphism in Papilio glaucus. Science 153: 551-553.
35. Pavulaan H, Wright DM, (2002) Pterourus appalachiensis (Papilionidae: Papilioninae), a new swallowtail butterfly from the Appalachian Region of the United States. Tax Rep Internl Lep Sur 3: 1-20.
36. Pavulaan H, Wright DM, (2004) Discovery of a black female form of Pterourus appalachiensis (Papilionidae: Papilioninae) and additional observations of the species in West Virginia. Tax Rep Internl Lep Sur 6: 1-10.
37. Scriber JM, Ording GJ, (2005) Ecological speciation without host plant specialization; possible origins of a recently described cryptic Papilio species. Ent Exp Appl 115: 247-263.
38. Scriber JM, Ording GJ, Mercader RJ, (2008) Introgression and parapatric speciation in a hybrid zone. In: Tilmon KJ, editors. Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects Berkeley, California University of California Press pp. 69-87.
39. Sperling FAH, (2003) Butterfly molecular systematics: From species definitions to higher-level phylogenies. In: Boggs CL, Watt WB, Ehrlich PR, editors. Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight Chicago University of Chicago Press pp. 431-458.
40. Zakharov EV, Caterino MS, Sperling FAH, (2004) Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for Swallowtail Butterflies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst Biol 53: 193-215.
41. Ording GJ, Mercader RJ, Aardema ML, Scriber JM, (2010) Allochronic isolation and incipient hybrid speciation in tiger swallowtail butterflies. Oecologia 162: 523-531.
42. Barton NH, Gale KS, (1993) Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In: Harrison RG, editors. Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process USA Oxford University Press pp. 13-45.
43. Qvarnström A, Bailey RI, (2009) Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 102: 4-15.
44. Sperling FAH, (1994) Sex-linked genes and species differences in Lepidoptera. Can Ent 126: 807-818.
45. Prowell DP, (1998) Sex linkage and speciation in Lepidoptera. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, editors. Endless forms: Species and speciation Oxford Oxford University Press pp. 309-319.
46. Schwarz D, Matta BM, Shakir-Botteri NL, McPheron BA, (2005) Host shift to an invasive plant triggers rapid animal hybrid speciation. Nature 436: 546-549.
47. Nolte AW, Freyhof J, Stemshorn KC, Tautz D, (2005) An invasive lineage of sculpins, Cottus sp. (Pisces, Teleostei) in the Rhine with new habitat adaptations has originated from hybridization between old phylogeographic groups. Proc R Soc B 272: 2379-2387.
48. Scriber JM, (2011) Impacts of climate warming on hybrid zone movement: Geographically diffuse and biologically porous "species borders". Insect Sci 18: 121-159.
49. Brower LP, (1959) Speciation in butterflies of the Papilio glaucus group. I. Morphological relationships and hybridization. Evolution 13: 40-63.
50. Scott JA, (1986) The Butterflies of North America: A Natural History and Field Guide. Stanford, USA Stanford University Press.
51. Rothschild W, Jordan K, (1906) A revision of the American Papilios. Novitates Zoologicae 13: 411-744.
52. Mallet J, Beltran M, Neukirchen W, Linares M, (2007) Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary as a continuum. BMC Evol Biol 7: 28.
53. Sperling FAH, (1990) Interspecific hybrids in Papilio butterflies: Poor taxonomy or interesting evolutionary problem? Can J Zool 68: 1790-1799.
54. Jiggins CD, Mallet J, (2000) Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 250-255.
55. Mallet J, (1995) A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 294-299.
56. Hagen RH, Scriber JM, (1991) Systematics of the Papilio glaucus and P. troilus species groups (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): inferences from allozymes. Annals Ent Soc Amer 84: 380-395.
57. Hagen RH, (1990) Population structure and host use in hybridizing subspecies of Papilio glaucus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Evolution 44: 1914-1930.
58. Allen TJ, (1997) The butterflies of West Virginia and their caterpillars University of Pittsburgh Press.
59. Nazari V, Zakharov EV, Sperling FAH, (2007) Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and taxonomic ranking of Parnassiinae (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) based on morphology and seven genes. Mol Phylogen Evol 42: 131-156.
60. Excoffier L, Lischer H, (2009) Arlequin: An Integrated Software Package for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Ver.
61. Andolfatto P, Scriber JM, Charlesworth B, (2003) No association between mitochondrial DNA haplotypes and a female-limited mimicry phenotype in Papilio glaucus. Evolution 57: 305-316.
62. Birky CW Jr, (1995) Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 92: 11331-11338.
63. Moritz C, Dowling TE, Brown WM, (1987) Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 269-292.
64. Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM, Bermingham E, Lamb T, et al. (1987) Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18: 489-522.
65. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
66. Swofford DL, (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4 Sunderland, MA Sinauer Associates.
67. Kronforst MR, Salazar C, Linares M, Gilbert LE, (2007) No genomic mosaicism in a putative hybrid butterfly species. Proc R Soc B 274: 1255-1264.
68. Rosenberg NA, (2007) Distruct: A Program for the Graphical Display of Population Structure. Ver.
69. Albertson RC, Markert JA, Danley PD, Kocher TD, (1999) Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: The cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 96: 5107-5110.
70. Beardsley PM, Yen A, Olmstead RG, (2003) AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57: 1397-1410.
71. Hollingsworth PM, Ennos RA, (2004) Neighbour joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure. Heredity 92: 490-498.
72. Mendelson TC, Shaw KL, (2005) Rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433: 375-376.
73. Rudh A, Rogell B, Hoglund J, (2007) Non-gradual variation in colour morphs of the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio: genetic and geographical isolation suggest a role for selection in maintaining polymorphism. Mol Ecol 16: 4284-4294.
74. Chamberlain NL, Hill RI, Kapan DD, Gilbert LE, Kronforst MR, (2009) Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science 326: 847-850.
75. Quek S-P, Counterman BA, Moura PAd, Cardoso MZ, Marshall CR, et al. (2010) Dissecting comimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 107: 7365-7370.
76. Savage WK, Mullen SP, (2009) A single origin of Batesian mimicry among hybridizing populations of admiral butterflies (Limenitis arthemis) rejects an evolutionary reversion to the ancestral phenotype. Proc R Soc B 276: 2557-2565.
77. Maddison DR, Maddison WP, (2003) MacClade 4. Version 4.06 Sunderland, MA Sinauer Associates.
78. Nielsen R, Wakeley J, (2001) Distinguishing migration from isolation. A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158: 885-96.
79. Hey J, Nielsen R, (2004) Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 167: 747-760.
80. Won YJ, Hey J, (2005) Divergence population genetics of chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 22: 297-307.
81. Hey J, Nielsen R, (2007) Integration within the Felsenstein equation for improved Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods in population genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 104: 2785-2790.
82. Woerner AE, Cox MP, Hammer MF, (2007) Recombination-filtered genomic datasets by information naximization. Bioinformatics 23: 1851-1853.
83. Brower AVZ, (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 91: 6491-6495.
84. Librado P, Rozas J, (2009) DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.