Patient-reported outcome measures and risk factors in a quality registry: A basis for more patient-centered diabetes care in Sweden

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 12223-12246

  Borg, Sixten ^a,b   Palaszewski, Bo ^c,d   Gerdtham, Ulf Ga ^a,b,e   Ödegaard, Fredrik ^f   Roos, Pontus ^h   Gudbjörnsdottir, Soffia ^c,d,g  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

^c Centre of Registers   (Sweden)

^d Center of Registers in Region Vastra Götaland   (Sweden)

^e School of Economics and Management   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^g SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^h RR Institute of Applied Economics   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Evaluation; Item response theory IRT; Patient centered diabetes care; Patient reported outcome measures PROM; Registry data; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DIABETES; DISEASE INCIDENCE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RISK; HEALTH STATUS; MORBIDITY; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIABETES SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRE; DISEASE REGISTRY; EUROQOL 5D QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTION STUDY; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CARE; SWEDEN; THEORY; THEORY-PRACTICE RELATIONSHIP; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; ADOLESCENT; DIABETES MELLITUS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; REGISTER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

SWEDEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATA COLLECTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84912570623     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111212223     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. United Nations (UN). UN Resolution 61/225: World Diabetes Day; UN: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
2. Nationella Diabetesregistret. Nationella Diabetesregistret. Årsrapport. 2010 års Resultat.; Västra Götalandsregionen: Göteborg, Sweden, 2011.
3. Nationella Diabetesregistret. Nationella Diabetesregistret. Årsrapport. 2011 års Resultat.; Västra Götalandsregionen: Göteborg, Sweden, 2012.
4. Gudbjornsdottir, S.; Cederholm, J.; Nilsson, P.M.; Eliasson, B. The national diabetes register in sweden: An implementation of the st. Vincent declaration for quality improvement in diabetes care. Diabetes Care 2003, 26, 1270-1276.
5. Blomqvist, A. The doctor as double agent: Information asymmetry, health insurance, and medical care. J. Health Econ. 1991, 10, 411-432.
6. Sheaff, R.; Pickard, S.; Smith, K. Public service responsiveness to users' demands and needs: Theory, practice and primary healthcare in england. Pub. Admin. 2002, 80, 435-452.
7. Brasil, F.; Pontarolo, R.; Correr, C.J. Patient reported outcomes measures (PROMS) in diabetes: Why are they still rarely used in clinical routine? Diabetes Res. Clin. Prac. 2012, 97, e4-e5.
8. Cederholm, J.; Eeg-Olofsson, K.; Eliasson, B.; Zethelius, B.; Gudbjornsdottir, S. A new model for 5-year risk of cardiovascular disease in type 1 diabetes; from the swedish national diabetes register (NDR). Diabet. Med. 2011, 28, 1213-1220.
9. Zethelius, B.; Eliasson, B.; Eeg-Olofsson, K.; Svensson, A.M.; Gudbjornsdottir, S.; Cederholm, J. A new model for 5-year risk of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes, from the Swedish national diabetes register (NDR). Diabetes Res. Clin. Prac. 2011, 93, 276-284.
10. Nam, S.; Chesla, C.; Stotts, N.A.; Kroon, L.; Janson, S.L. Barriers to diabetes management: Patient and provider factors. Diabetes Res. Clin. Prac. 2011, 93, 1-9.
11. Thorpe, C.T.; Fahey, L.E.; Johnson, H.; Deshpande, M.; Thorpe, J.M.; Fisher, E.B. Facilitating healthy coping in patients with diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2013, 39, 33-52.
12. Fidler, C.; Elmelund Christensen, T.; Gillard, S. Hypoglycemia: An overview of fear of hypoglycemia, quality-of-life, and impact on costs. J. Med. Econ. 2011, 14, 646-655.
13. Strachan, M.W. Fear of diabetes complications. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2005, 21, 262-263.
14. Zoffmann, V.; Harder, I.; Kirkevold, M. A person-centered communication and reflection model: Sharing decision-making in chronic care. Qual. Health Res. 2008, 18, 670-685.
15. American Diabetes for the diagnosis of diabetes. Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2012. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, S4-S10.
16. Myndigheten för Vårdanalys. Patient-Centeredness in Sweden's Health System. An Assessment and Six Steps for Progress. Available online: http://www.vardanalys.se/Global/Rapporter%20pdf-filer/ 2013/2012-7-Patientcenteredness-v7%200-web.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2012).
17. Glenngard, A.H.; Anell, A.; Beckman, A. Choice of primary care provider: Results from a population survey in three swedish counties. Health Policy 2011, 103, 31-37.
18. Janlöv, N.; Rehnberg, C. Uppföljning av Husläkarsystemet Inom Vårdval Stockholm-år 2010; Karolinska Institutets folkhälsoakademi: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011.
19. Lundstrom, M.; Pesudovs, K. Catquest-9sf patient outcomes questionnaire: Nine-item short-form rasch-scaled revision of the catquest questionnaire. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2009, 35, 504-513.
20. Gibbons, E.; Fitzpatrick, R. A Structured Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) for Diabetes. Report to the Department of Health; Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Group, University of Oxford: Oxford, UK, 2009.
21. Wikblad, K.; Leksell, J.; Wibell, L. Health-related quality of life in relation to metabolic control and late complications in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Qual. Life Res. 1996, 5, 123-130.
22. Leksell, J.K.; Sandberg, G.E.; Wikblad, K.F. Self-perceived health and self-care among diabetic subjects with defective vision: A comparison between subjects with threat of blindness and blind subjects. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2005, 19, 54-59.
23. Johnson, B.; Eiser, C.; Young, V.; Brierley, S.; Heller, S. Prevalence of depression among young people with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabet Med. 2013, 30, 199-208.
24. DeJean, D.; Giacomini, M.; Vanstone, M.; Brundisini, F. Patient experiences of depression and anxiety with chronic disease: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont. Health Technol. Assess. Ser. 2013, 13, 1-33.
25. Mayfield, J.A.; Deb, P.; Whitecotton, L. Work disability and diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999, 22, 1105-1109.
26. Von Korff, M.; Katon, W.; Lin, E.H.; Simon, G.; Ciechanowski, P.; Ludman, E.; Oliver, M.; Rutter, C.; Young, B. Work disability among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1326-1332.
27. Karlsen, B.; Oftedal, B.; Bru, E. The relationship between clinical indicators, coping styles, perceived support and diabetes-related distress among adults with type 2 diabetes. J. Adv. Nurs. 2012, 68, 391-401.
28. Schokker, M.C.; Stuive, I.; Bouma, J.; Keers, J.C.; Links, T.P.; Wolffenbuttel, B.H.; Sanderman, R.; Hagedoorn, M. Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: Main and moderating effects. J. Family Psychol. 2010, 24, 578-586.
29. Drummond, M. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1997; p. 305.
30. Hornsten, A.; Lundman, B.; Selstam, E.K.; Sandstrom, H. Patient satisfaction with diabetes care. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 51, 609-617.
31. Al Shahrani, A.; Baraja, M. Patient satisfaction and it's relation to diabetic control in a primary care setting. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2014, 3, 5-11.
32. Polonsky, W.H. Emotional and quality-of-life aspects of diabetes management. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2002, 2, 153-159.
33. Duangdao, K.M.; Roesch, S.C. Coping with diabetes in adulthood: A meta-analysis. J. Behav. Med. 2008, 31, 291-300.
34. The World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2014. Available Online: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/ (accessed on 5 March 2014)
35. Berne, C.; Fritz, T. Diabetes mellitus. In Läkemedelsboken; Medical Products Agency: Uppsala, Sweden, 2012.
36. Amsberg, S.; Wredling, R.; Lins, P.E.; Adamson, U.; Johansson, U.B. The psychometric properties of the swedish version of the problem areas in diabetes scale (swe-paid-20): Scale development. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2008, 45, 1319-1328.
37. Leksell, J.; Funnell, M.; Sandberg, G.; Smide, B.; Wiklund, G.; Wikblad, K. Psychometric properties of the swedish diabetes empowerment scale. Scand. J. Car. Sci. 2007, 21, 247-252.
38. Wredling, R.; Stalhammar, J.; Adamson, U.; Berne, C.; Larsson, Y.; Ostman, J. Well-being and treatment satisfaction in adults with diabetes: A swedish population-based study. Qual. Life Res. 1995, 4, 515-522.
39. Ware, J.E.; Snow, K.; Kosinski, M. Sf-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: London, UK, 1993.
40. EuroQol Group. Euroqol-A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The euroqol group. Health Policy 1990, 16, 199-208.
41. Hays, R.D.; Morales, L.S.; Reise, S.P. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med. Care 2000, 38, II28-II42.
42. Cella, D.; Chang, C.H. A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment. Med. Care 2000, 38, II66-II72.
43. Van der Ark, L.A. Mokken scale analysis in r. J. Stat. Softw. 2007, 20, 1-19.
44. Edelen, M.O.; Reeve, B.B. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual. Life Res. 2007, 16, 5-18.
45. Revelle, W. Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, And Personality Research; Northwestern University: Evanston, IL, USA, 2011.
46. Orlando, M. Critical issues to address when applying item response theory (irt) models. In Advances in Health Outcomes Measurement: Exploring the Current State and the Future of Item Response Theory, Item Banks, and Computer-Adaptive Testing; National Cancer Institute and Drug Information Association: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2004.
47. Samejima, F. Graded response model. In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory; van der Linden, W.J., Hambleton, R.K., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 85-100.
48. Orlando, M.; Thissen, D. Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 2000, 24, 50-64.
49. Kang, T.; Chen, T.T. Performance of the generalized s-x2 item fit index for the graded response model. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2010, 12, 89-96.
50. Maydeu-Olivares, A.; Garcia-Forero, C. Goodness-of-fit testing. Int. Encycl. Educ. 2010, 7, 190-196.
51. Hooper, D.; Coughlan, J.; Mullen, M.R. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2008, 6, 53-60.
52. Milfont, T.L.; Fischer, R. Testing measuring invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. Int. J. Psychol. Res. 2010, 3, 111-121.
53. Burstrom, K.; Sun, S.; Gerdtham, U.G.; Henriksson, M.; Johannesson, M.; Levin, L.A.; Zethraeus, N. Swedish experience-based value sets for eq-5d health states. Qual. Life Res. 2013, 23, 431-442.
54. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2009.
55. Rizopoulos, D. Ltm: An r package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J. Stat. Softw. 2006, 17, 1-25.
56. Scientific Software International. Irt pro: User's Guide; Scientific Software International, Inc.: Lincolnwood, IL, USA, 2011.
57. Peterson, A.; Bojestig, M.; Gudbjörnsdottir, S.; Löfgren, U.B.; Schiöler, L.; Thor, J.; Andersson Gäre, B. The active use of a national quality registry can improve diabetes care- Results from a multi-centre quality improvement collaborative program. (Under review).
58. Peterson, A.; Bojestig, M.; Gudbjörnsdottir, S.; Löfgren, U.B.; Schiöler, L.; Thor, J.; Andersson Gäre, B. Using a national quality register together with systematic improvement tools to improve diabetes care. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Scientific Symposium on Improving Quality and Value in Health Care, Orlando, FL, USA, 6 December 2010.
59. Nationella Diabetesregistret. Nationella Diabetesregistret. Årsrapport. 2012 års Resultat.; Västra Götalandsregionen: Göteborg, Sweden, 2013.
60. Spector, P.E. Summated Rating Scale Construction: Introduction; Sage Pubns.: California, CA, USA, 1992.