Goodness-of-fit testing

International Encyclopedia of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 190-196

  Maydeu Olivares, A ^a   Garcia Forero C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chi square tests; Cross validation; Goodness of fit indices; Goodness of fit statistics; Item response theory; Likelihood ratio test; Model selection; Resampling; Structural equation models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884446977     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01333-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Browne M.W. Covariance structures. Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis 1982, 72-141. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D.M. Hawkins (Ed.).
2. Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing Structural Equation Models 1993, 136-162. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.).
3. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression 2000, Wiley, New York.
4. MacCallum R.C., Roznowski M., Necowitz L.B. Model modification in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 111:490-504.
5. MacCallum R.C., Wegener D.T., Uchino B.N., Fabrigar L.R. The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:185-199.
6. 2 (dif) to assess relative model fit in categorical data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2006, 41:55-64.
7. n contingency tables: A unified framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2005, 100:1009-1020.
8. Maydeu-Olivares A., Joe H. Limited information goodness-of-fit testing in multidimensional contingency tables. Psychometrika 2006, 71:713-732.
9. Satorra A., Bentler P.M. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. Latent Variable Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research 1994, 399-419. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. A. von Eye, C.C. Clogg (Eds.).
10. Steiger J.H. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences 2007, 42:893-898.
11. Tollenaar N., Mooijart A. Type I errors and power of the parametric goodness-of-fit test. Full and limited information. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2003, 56:271-288.
12. Yuan K.-H., Bentler P.M. Mean and covariance structure analysis: Theoretical and practical improvements. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997, 92:767-774.
13. Yuan K.-H., Bentler P.M. On chi-square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is mispecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2004, 64:737-757.
14. Bartholomew D.J., Tzamourani P. The goodness of fit of latent trait models in attitude measurement. Sociological Methods and Research 1999, 27:525-546.
15. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 107:238-246.
16. Bollen K.A., Stine R. Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research 1992, 21:205-229.
17. Browne M.W. Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2000, 44:108-132.
18. Browne M.W., MacCallum R.C., Kim C.-T., Anderson B., Glaser R. When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:403-421.
19. Hu L.-T., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999, 6:1-55.
20. 2 in cross-validation samples. Psychometrika 2006, 71:587-592.
21. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Cai L. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods 2006, 11:19-35.
22. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., Sugawara H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1996, 1:130-149.
23. Mavridis D., Moustaki I., Knott M. Goodness-of-fit measures for latent variable models for binary data. Handbook of Latent Variables and Related Models 2007, 135-162. Elsevier, Amsterdam. S.-Y. Lee (Ed.).
24. McDonald R.P., Ho M.-H.R. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:64-82.
25. Satorra A., Saris W.E. Power Evaluations in Structural Equation Models 1993, 181-204. Sage, Newberry Park, CA.
26. Swaminathan H., Hambleton R.K., Rogers H.J. Assessing the fit of item response models. Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 26: Psychometrics 2007, 683-718. Elsevier, Amsterdam. C.R. Rao, S. Sinharay (Eds.).
27. Yuan K.H. Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2005, 40:115-148.