Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes

Laryngoscope

Volumn 124, Issue S6, 2014, Pages S1-S7

  Wanna, George B ^a   Noble, Jack H ^b   Carlson, Matthew L ^a   Gifford, René H ^c   Dietrich, Mary S ^a   Haynes, David S ^a   Dawant, Benoit M ^b   Labadie, Robert F ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Cochleostomy; Electrode; Round window; Sensorineural hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA FENESTRA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEOSTOMY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSONANT; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXTENDED ROUND WINDOW; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LATERAL WALL ELECTRODE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIMODIOLAR ELECTRODE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SCALA TYMPANI; SCALA VESTIBULI; WORD RECOGNITION; COCHLEA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SCALA TYMPANI; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84912010682     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24728     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:582-589.
2. Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. Ann Otolo Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:194-196.
3. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Preoperative predictors of outcomes from cochlear implantation in adults: performance and quality of life. Ann Otolo Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:105-108.
4. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol 1996;1:293-306.
5. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999;20:445-452.
6. Tong YC, Busby PA, Clark GM. Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;84:951-962.
7. Mens LH, Berenstein CK. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:957-964.
8. Pfingst BE, Franck KH, Xu L, Bauer EM, Zwolan TA. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001;2:87-103.
9. Carlson ML, Breen JT, Gifford RH, et al. Cochlear implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:1343-1349.
10. Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD, et al. Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:1049-1054.
11. Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993;66:108-120.
12. Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 2007;28:75S-79S.
13. Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B, et al. Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:34-37.
14. Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, et al. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:920-928.
15. Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et al. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2013;34:342-360.
16. Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, et al. In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otolo Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2007;197:2-24.
17. Adunka OF, Buchman CA. Scala tympani cochleostomy I: results of a survey. Laryngoscope 2007;117:2187-2194.
18. Noble JH, Labadie RF, Majdani O, Dawant BM. Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:2625-2632.
19. Schuman TA, Noble JH, Wright CG, Wanna GB, Dawant B, Labadie RF. Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography. Laryngoscope 2010;120:2277-2283.
20. Noble JH, Schuman A, Wright CG, Labadie RF, Dawant BM. Automatic identification of cochlear implant electrode arrays for post-operative assessment. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 2011;796217:1-10.
21. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:187-198.
22. Roland PS, Wright CG. Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006;64:11-30.
23. Roland JT Jr. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1325-1339.
24. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802.
25. Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1397-1402.
26. Dimopoulos P, Muren C. Anatomic variations of the cochlea and relations to other temporal bone structures. Acta Radiol 1990;31:439-444.
27. Erixon E, Hogstorp H, Wadin K, Rask-Andersen H. Variational anatomy of the human cochlea: implications for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:14-22.
28. Escude B, James C, Deguine O, Cochard N, Eter E, Fraysse B. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11(suppl 1):27-33.
29. Pelosi S, Noble JH, Dawant BM, Labadie RF. Analysis of inter-subject variations in promontory and intracochlear anatomy for cochelar implantation. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:1675-1680.
30. Noble JH, Labadie RF, Wanna GB, and Dawant BM. Image guidance could aid performance of atraumatic cochlear implantation surgical techniques. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 2013;86711:1-7
31. Wanna GB, Noble JH, McRackan TR, et al. Assessment of electrode placement and audiological outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:428-432.
32. Green KM, Bhatt Y, Mawman DJ, et al. Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults. Cochlear Implants Int 2007;8:1-11.
33. Budenz CL, Cosetti MK, Coelho DH, et al. The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:446-453.
34. Carlson ML, Driscoll CL, Gifford RH, et al. Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:962-968.
35. Turner CW, Reiss LA, Gantz BJ. Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing. Hear Res 2008;242:164-171.
36. Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarzynski H, et al. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear 2013;34:413-25.