Analysis of intersubject variations in intracochlear and middle ear surface anatomy for cochlear implantation

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1675-1680

  Pelosi, Stanley ^a   Noble, Jack H ^b   Dawant, Benoit M ^b   Labadie, Robert F ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomic variability; Cochlear anatomy; Cochlear implant; Electrode insertion; Middle ear surface anatomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA FENESTRA; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INDIVIDUALITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE EAR; RADIOGRAPHY;

COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; EAR, MIDDLE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; ROUND WINDOW, EAR;

EID: 84892705475     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a1a7e6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802.
2. Dunn CC, Perreau A, Gantz B, Tyler RS. Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant. J Am Acad Audiol 2010;21:44-51.
3. Carlson ML, Driscoll CL, Gifford RH, et al. Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:962-8.
4. Roland PS, Wright CG. Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006;64: 11-30.
5. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, et al. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurotol 2006;11:42-8.
6. Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 2007;28:75S-9.
7. Erixon E, Hogstorp H, Wadin K, Rask-Andersen H. Variational anatomy of the human cochlea: implications for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:14-22.
8. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:187-98.
9. Rohde GK, Aldroubi A, Dawant BM. The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:1470-9.
10. Noble JH, Labadie RF, Majdani O, Dawant BM. Automatic segmentation of intra-cochlear anatomy in conventional CT. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:2625-32.
11. Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD. Least square fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1987;9:698-700.
12. Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B. The Visualization Toolkit, 3rd ed. Clifton Park, NY: Kitware, 2003.
13. Biedron S, Prescher A, Ilgner J, Westhofen M. The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:731-7.
14. Meshik X, Holden TA, Chole RA, Hullar TE. Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:58-63.
15. Martinez-Monedero R, Niparko JK, Aygun N. Cochlear coiling pattern and orientation differences in cochlear implant candidates. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:1086-93.
16. Noble JH, Labadie RF, Wanna GB, Dawant BM. Image guidance could aid performance of atraumatic cochlear implantation surgical techniques. Presented at SPIE Conf on Medical Imaging. 2013.