Erratum to: Grammatical constraints on phonological encoding in speech production (Psychon Bull Rev, (2014), 21, 1576-1582, DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0616-3);Grammatical constraints on phonological encoding in speech production

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1576-1582

  Heller, Jordana R ^a   Goldrick, Matthew ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Phonology; Psycholinguistics; Speech production

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84911998710     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0928-y     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Alario, F.-X., Matos, R. E., & Segui, J. (2004). Gender congruency effects in picture naming. Acta Psychologica, 117, 185-204.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baese-Berk, M., & Goldrick, M. (2009). Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 527-554.
4. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255-278.
5. Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. H., & Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia. Brain and Language, 56, 68-106.
6. Bock, K. (1987). An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 119-137.
7. Boersma, P., &Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.15, retrieved 6 April 2013 from http://www.praat.org/
8. Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119, 417-430.
9. Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123-147.
10. Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., & Kittredge, A. K. (2008). Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 583-608.
11. Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 789-806.
12. Goldrick, M., Folk, J. R., & Rapp, B. (2010).Mrs. Malaprop's neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 113-134.
13. Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, 113-145.
14. Gordon, J. K., & Dell, G. S. (2003). Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Science, 27, 1-40.
15. Gordon, J. K., & Kurczek, J. C. (2014). The ageing neighborhood: Phonological density in naming. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 326-344.
16. Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 313-338.
17. Harley, T. A., & Bown, H. E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 151-174.
18. Hartsuiker, R. J. (2006). Are speech error patterns affected by a monitoring bias? Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 856-891.
19. Jaeger, T. F., Furth, K., & Hilliard, C. (2012). Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1439-1449.
20. Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Grammatical and phonological influences on word order. Psychological Science, 20, 1262-1268.
21. Kirov, C., & Wilson, C. (2013). Bayesian speech production: Evidence from latency and hyperarticulation. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 788-793). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
22. Moon, S.-J., & Lindblom, B. (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 40-55.
23. Munson, B. (2007). Lexical access, lexical representation, and vowel production. In J. S. Cole & J. I. Hualde (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology (9th ed., pp. 201-228). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Munson, B., & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1048-1058.
25. Newman, R. S., & German, D. J. (2005). Life span effects of lexical factors on oral naming. Language and Speech, 48, 123-156.
26. Pechmann, T., & Zerbst, D. (2002). The activation of word class information during speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 233-243.
27. Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F.-X. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 33-58.
28. Simpson, A. P. (2009). Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 621-640.
29. Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (2004). Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 675-686.
30. Strand, J., Simenstad, A., Cooperman, A., & Rowe, J. (2014). Grammatical context constrains lexical competition in spoken word recognition. Memory&Cognition. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0378-6
31. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., & Siri, S. (2005). Semantic similarity and grammatical class in naming actions. Cognition, 94, B91-B100.
32. Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40, 211-228.
33. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 735-747.
34. Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31, 491- 504.
35. Wright, R. (2004). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology VI (pp. 75-87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.