Being 'at' university: The social topologies of distance students

Higher Education

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 569-583

  Bayne, Sian ^a   Gallagher, Michael Sean ^b   Lamb, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b Hankuk University of Foreign Studies   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Distance education; Mobilities; Online education; Space; University

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911984999     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-013-9662-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States 2011. Babson Survey Research Group Report. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/goingthedistance.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2012.
2. Bayne, S. (2004). Smoothness and striation in digital learning spaces. E-learning, 1(2), 302-316.
3. Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities. London: Routledge.
4. Brindley, L. (2011). Collaborate to compete: Seizing the opportunity of online learning for UK higher education. Bristol: Online Learning Task Force/HEFCE. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2011/11_01/. Accessed 16 July 2012.
5. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32. http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/minds-fire-open-education-long-tail-and-learning-20. Accessed 16 July 2012.
6. Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1-11.
7. Clark, N. (2012). Understanding transnational education, its growth and implications. News article. World Education News and Reviews. August 2012, 25(7). http://www.wes.org/ewenr/12aug/practical.htm. Accessed 11 July 2013.
8. Counihan, B. (2013). The Aussie Coursera? A new homegrown MOOC platform arrives. News article. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-aussie-coursera-a-new-homegrown-mooc-platform-arrives-12949. Accessed 11 July 2013.
9. Edwards, R., Tracy, F., & Jordan, K. (2011). Mobilities, moorings and boundary marking in developing semantic technologies in educational practices. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 219-232.
10. Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2007). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
11. Enriquez, J. (2011). Tug-o-where: Situating mobilities of learning (t)here. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(1), 39-53.
12. Enriquez, J. (2012). Being (t)here: Mobilising 'mediaspaces' of learning. Learning, Media and Technology (iFirst article). doi:10.1080/17439884.2012.685744#.Ud6JfPnCaSo.
13. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge.
14. Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1-22.
15. Hanover Research. (2011). Trends in global distance learning. Research report. Hanover Research. http://www.hanoverresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Trends-in-Global-Distance-Learning-Membership.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013.
16. Hine, C. (2004). Research relationships and online relationships: Introduction. In Christine Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet (pp. 17-20). Oxford and New York: Berg.
17. Holdsworth, C. (2009). 'Going away to uni': Mobility, modernity, and independence of English higher education students. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1849-1864.
18. Hooley, T., Marriott, J., & Wellens, J. (2012). What is online research?: Using the internet for social science research. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
19. ICDE. (2009). ICDE environmental scan: Global trends in higher education, adult education and distance learning. Research report. International Council for Distance Education. http://www.icde.org/filestore/Resources/Reports/FINALICDEENVIRNOMENTALSCAN05.02.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013.
20. James, N., & Busher, H. (2012). Internet interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (pp. 177-188). London: SAGE.
21. Law, J. (2002). Objects and spaces. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5-6), 91-105.
22. Law, J., & Mol, A. (2001). Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities. Environment and Planning D, 19, 609-621.
23. Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331-355.
24. Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34, 329-394.
25. Marsden, R. (1996). Time, space and distance education. Distance Education, 17(2), 222-246.
26. Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641-671.
27. OpenUpEd. (2013). About OpenUpEd. Web page. http://www.openuped.eu/openuped-temp/59-about-openuped. Accessed 11 July 2013.
28. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207-226.
29. Sterne, J. (2006). Critical cyberculture studies. New York: New York University Press.
30. Taylor, C. (2009). Towards a geography of education. Oxford Review of Education, 5(5), 651-669.
31. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. White, D., Warren, N., Faughnan, S., & Manton, M. (2010). Study of UK online learning: Report to HEFCE by the Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford. Research Report. University of Oxford. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/UKOnlineLearningStudy-FinalReport-Mar10-FINAL-FORPUB.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013.