Internet interviewing

The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 177-192

  James, Nalita ^a   Busher, Hugh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925288240     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218403.n12     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera's immortality: The interview society and the invention of self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304-325.
2. Bakardjieva, M., & Feenberg, A. (2000). Involving the virtual subject. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 233-240.
3. Bampton, R., & Cowton, C. J. (2002). The E-interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/
4. Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2004). Internet data collection. London, England: Sage.
5. Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2004). Using the online medium for discursive research about people with disabilities. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 228-241.
6. Burkeman, O. (2008, January 2). The Internet. The Guardian, p. 19.
7. Burns, E. (2010). Developing email interview practices in qualitative research. Sociological Research Online, 15(8). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/8.html
8. Busher, H. (2001, March). Being and becoming a doctoral student: Culture, literacies and self-identity. Paper presented at the TESOL Arabia Conference, Dubai, UAE.
9. Capurro, R., & Pingel, C. (2002). Ethical issues of online communication research. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 189-194.
10. Cavanagh, A. (2007). Sociology in the age of the Internet. Maidenhead, England: Open University/McGraw-Hill.
11. Chadwick, R. (2001). Ethical assessment and the human genome issues. In P. Shipley & D. Moir (eds.), Ethics in practice in the 21st century. Proceedings of the Interdiscplinary Conference of the Society for the Furtherance of Critical Philosophy. Oxfordshire, England: Society for the Furtherance of Critical Philosophy.
12. Chen, P., & Hinton, S. M. (1999). Realtime interviewing using the World Wide Web. Sociological Research Online, 4. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/4/3/chen/html
13. Coleman, S. (2006). Email, terrorism, and the right to privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 17-27.
14. Danet, B. (1998). Text as mask: Gender, play and performance on the Internet. Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Delorme, D. E., Zinkhan, G. E., & French, W. (2001). Ethics and the Internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 271-286.
16. Denzin, N. (1999). Cybertalk and the method of instances. In S. Jones (ed.), Critical issues and methods for examining the net, doing Internet research (pp. 107-125). London, England: Sage.
17. Dominguez, D., Beaulieu, A., Estalella, S., Gomez, E., Schnettler, B., & Read, R. (2007). Virtual ethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-07/07-3-E1-e.htm
18. Economic and Social Research Council. (2005). Research ethics framework. Swindon, England: Author.
19. Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 195-203.
20. Ess, C., & Association of Internet Researchers. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research. Retrieved from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
21. Evans, K. F. (2004). Maintaining community in the information age: The importance of trust, place and situated knowledge. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323, 1103-1105.
23. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Ed. & Trans.). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
24. Fox, E. F., Morris, M., & Rumsey, N. (2007). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 539-547.
25. Fox, J., Murray, C., & Warm, A. (2003). Conducting research using web-based questionnaires: Practical, methodological and ethical considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 167-180.
26. Gaiser, T. (1997). Conducting on-line focus groups: A methodological discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 135-144.
27. Gatson, S. N., & Zweerink, A. (2004). Ethnography online: "Natives" practicing and inscribing community. Qualitative Research, 4, 179-200.
28. Goodfellow, R. (2007, January). The impact of emerging web2.0 Internet practices on future developments in teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Learning Futures Conference, University of Leicester, England.
29. Hall, G. J., Frederick, D., & Johns, M. D. (2004). "NEED HELP ASAP!!!": A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics. In M. D. Johns, S. L. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics (pp. 239-252). Oxford, England: Peter Lang.
30. Hammersley, M. (2006). Ethnography: Problems and prospects. Ethnography and Education, 1, 3-14.
31. Hessler, R. M., Downing, J., Beltz, C., Pellicio, A., Powell, M., & Vale, W. (2003). Qualitative research on adolescent risk using email: A methodological assessment. Qualitative Sociology, 26, 111-124.
32. Hewson, C. (2003). Conducting research on the Internet. The Psychologist, 16, 290-293.
33. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London, England: Sage.
34. Hine, C. (2005). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford, England: Berg.
35. Hinton-Smith, T. (2006, December). Lone parents as higher education students: A qualitative email study. Paper presented at the ESREA Access, Learning Careers and Identities Network Conference, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
36. Hodgson, S. (2004). Cutting through the silence: A sociological construction of self-injury. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 162-179.
37. Illingworth, N. (2001). The Internet matters: Exploring the use of the Internet as a research tool. Sociological Research Online, 6. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/2/illingworth.html
38. Jacobson, D. (1999). Doing research in cyberspace. Field Methods, 11, 127-145.
39. James, N. (2003). Teacher professionalism, teacher identity: How do I see myself? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester, England.
40. James, N. (2007). The use of email interviewing as a qualitative method of inquiry in educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 963-976.
41. James, N., & Busher, H. (2006). Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in web-based interviewing. Qualitative Research Journal, 6, 403-420.
42. James, N., & Busher, H. (2007). Ethical issues in online educational research: Protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30, 101-113.
43. James, N., & Busher, H. (2009). Online interviewing. London, England: Sage.
44. Janelle, D. G., & Hodges, D. C. (2000). Information, place and cyberspace. New York, NY: Springer.
45. Jankowski, N. W, & Van Selm, M. (2005). Epilogue: Methodological concerns and innovations in Internet research. In C. Hine (ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 199-207). Oxford, England: Berg.
46. Jones, S. (1999). Doing Internet research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Kazmer, M., & Xie, B. (2008). Qualitative interviewing in Internet studies: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 257-278.
48. Kendall, L. (1999). Recontextualising cyperspace: Methodological considerations for online research. In S. Jones (ed.), Doing Internet research (pp. 57-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. King, S. A. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for reporting results. The Information Society, 12, 119-127.
50. Kivits, J. (2005). Online interviewing and the research relationship. In C. Hine (ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 35-50). Oxford, England: Berg.
51. Knoebel, M. (2005). Rants, ratings and representation: Ethical issues in researching online social practices. In K. Sheehy, M. Nind, J. Rix, & K. Simmons (eds.), Ethics and research in inclusive education: Values into practice (pp. 150-167). London, England: Routledge-Falmer/The Open University.
52. Kolko, B., & Reid, E. (1998). Dissolution and fragmentation: Problems in online communities. In S. Jones (ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 212-229). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Lee, H. (2006). Privacy, publicity and accountability of self-presentation in an online discussion group. Sociological Inquiry, 76, 1-22.
54. Ma, R. (1996). Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students. In S. Herring (ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 173-189). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
55. Madge, C. (2007). Developing a geographers' agenda for online research ethics. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 654-674.
56. Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for research online. London, England: Sage.
57. Markham, A. N. (2004). Representation in online ethnography. In M. D. Johns, S. L. S. Chen, & G. J. Hall (eds.), Online social research: Methods, issues and ethics (pp. 141-157). Oxford, England: Peter Lang.
58. Matthews, S. (2006). On-line professionals. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 61-71.
59. McCoyd, J., & Kerson, T. (2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 389-406.
60. Meho, L. (2006). E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1284-1295.
61. National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. (2003). Research ethics guidelines for Internet research (L. G. Lundh & C. Ess, Trans.). Oslo, Norway: Author.
62. O'Connor, H., & Madge, C. (2001). Cybermothers: Online synchronous interviewing using conferencing software. Sociological Research Online, 5. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/2/hine.html
63. O'Connor, H., & Madge, C. (2003). Focus groups in cyberspace: Using the Internet for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6, 133-143.
64. Orgad, S. (2005). From online to offline and back: Moving from online to offline relationships with research participants. In C. Hine (ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 51-66). Oxford, England: Berg.
65. Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community: Finding connection in a computerised world. London, England: Secker & Warburg.
66. Robson, K., & Robson, M. (2002). Your place or mine? Ethics, the researcher and the Internet. In T. Welland & L. Pigsley (eds.), Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research (pp. 94-107). London, England: Ashgate.
67. Sanders, T. (2005). Researching the online sex work community. In C. Hine (ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 67-80). Oxford, England: Berg.
68. Schneider, S. J., Kerwin, J., Frechtling, J., & Vivari, B. J. (2002). Characteristics of the discussion in online and face-to-face focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 31-42.
69. Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5, 395-416.
70. Teli, M., Francesco, P., & Hakken, D. (2007). The Internet as a library-of-people: For cyberethnography of online groups. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/283/622
71. Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London, England: Sage.
72. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen, identity in the age of the Internet. London, England: Phoenix/Orion.
73. Usher, R. (2000). Deconstructive happening, ethical moment. In H. Simons & R. Usher (eds.), Situated ethics in educational research (pp. 162-185). London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
74. Waskul, D., & Douglass, M. (1997). Cyberself: The emergence of self in on-line chat. Information Society, 13, 375-398.
75. Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, L. C. (2002). The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 449-467.
76. Xie, B. (2007). Using the Internet for offline relationship formation. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 396-404.
77. Zhao, S. (2006). The Internet and the transformation of the reality of everyday life: Towards a new analytic stance in sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 76, 458-474.