The relationship between urban development and the environmental impact mobility: A local case study

Land Use Policy

Volumn 43, Issue , 2015, Pages 119-128

  Mendiola, Lorea ^a   González, Pilar ^a   Cebollada, Àngel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Environmental impact; Land use; Mobility; Spatial econometrics; Urban sustainability

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LAND USE CHANGE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPILLOVER EFFECT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBANIZATION;

BASQUE COUNTRY [SPAIN]; BIZKAIA; SPAIN;

EID: 84911945110     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
2. Anselin L., Cohen J., Cook D., Gorr W., Tita G. Spatial analyses of crime. Measurement and analysis of crime and justice. Crim. Justice 2000 2000, 4:213-262.
3. Anselin L., Florax R. Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results. New Directions in Spatial Econometrics 1995, 21-74. Springer, Berlin.
4. Anselin L., Kelejian H. Testing for spatial error autocorrelation in the presence of endogenous regressors. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 1997, 20:153-182.
5. Boarnett M.G., Sarmiento S. Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use. Urban Stud. 1998, 35:1155-1169.
6. Boer R., Zheng Y., Overton A., Ridgeway G.K., Cohen D.A. Neighborhood design and walking trips in ten U.S. metropolitan areas. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007, 32(4):298-304.
7. Brownstone D., Golob T. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption. J. of Urban Econ. 2009, 65:91-98.
8. Camagni R., Gibelli M.C., Rigamonti P. Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 40:199-216.
9. Camagni R., Gibelli M.C., Rigamonti P. I costi collettivi della città dispersa 2002, Politecnico di Milano, Dipartamento di Ingegneria Gestionale, Alinea Editrice, Milano.
10. Camarero L.A., Oliva J. Exploring the social face of urban mobility: daily mobility as part of the social structure in Spain. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2008, 32.2:344-362.
11. Cervero R. Land uses and travel at suburban activity centers. The University of California Transportation Center. Transport. Q. 1991, 45:479-491.
12. Cervero R., Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity and design. Transport. Res. D 1997, 2(3):199-219.
13. Chasco C. GoeDaSpace: a resource for teaching spatial regression models. Rect@ 2013, 12/2013(4 (Special issue)):119-144.
14. Crane R. The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretative review. J. Plan. Lit. 2000, 15(Agosto (1)):3-23.
15. Dieleman F.M., Dijst M., Burghouwt G. Urban form and travel behaviour: micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Stud. 2002, 39:507-527.
16. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment. a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2010, 76(3):265-294.
17. Ewing R., Pendall R., Chen D. Measuring sprawl and its impacts 2002, Smart growth America, Washington.
18. Frank L., Pivo G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: SOV, transit and walking. Transport. Res. Rec. 1995, 1466, TRB:44-55.
19. Frank L., Chapman J., Bradley M., Lawton K. Travel Behavoir, Emissions & Land Use Correlation Analysis in the Central Puget Sound 2005, Whasington State Department of Transportation, US Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration.
20. Fouchier V. V., Les densités urbaines et le développement durable: le cas de l'Île-de-France et des villes nouvelles 1998, Edition du Sgvn, Paris.
21. Geary R. The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. Inc. Stat. 1954, 5:115-145.
22. GeoDa Center GeoDaSpace Alpha for Windows, 0.8.1(1) 2012, GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation, Available from: https://geodacenter.asu.edu/geodaspace:download.
23. Gibelli M.C. 2007. Los costes económicos y sociales de la ciudad de baja densidad. En Indovina (coord.), La ciudad de baja densidad. Lógicas, gestión y contención, pp. 277-306. Diputació de Barcelona.
24. Gutiérrez J., Condeço-Melhorado A., Martín J.C. Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment. J. Transport Geogr. 2010, 18(January (1)):141-152.
25. Handy S. Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transport. Res. 1996, D 1:151-165.
26. Henry G., 2007. Análisis de costes de la baja densidad. Una lectura desde la sostenibilidad. En Indovina (coord.), La ciudad de baja densidad. Lógicas, gestión y contención. Diputació de Barcelona.
27. Holtzclaw J.W. Using Residencial Patterns and Transit to Decrease Auto Dependence and Costs 1994, National Resources Defense Council, San Francisco.
28. Hong J., Shen Q. Residential density and transportation emissions: examining the connection by addressing spatial autocorrelation and self-selection. Transport. Res. D 2013, 22:75-79.
29. Hong J., Shen Q., Lei Zhang L. How do built-environment factors affect travel behavior? A spatial analysis at different geographic scales. Transportation 2013, 10.1007/s11116-013-9462-9.
30. Kelejian H.H., Robinson D. A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrelated errors and an application to a county expenditure model. Pap. Reg. Sci. 1993, 72:297-312.
31. Kitamura R., Mokhtarian P.L., Laidet L. A microanalysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation 1997, 24:125-158.
32. Krizek K.J. Residential relocation and changes in urban travel. Does neighborhood-scale urban forro matter?. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2003, 69:265-281.
33. Litman T., Steele R. Land Use Impacts on Transport. How Land Use Factors Affect Travel Behavior 2009, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
34. Moniruzzaman M., Páez A. Accessibility to transit, by transit, and mode share: application of a logistic model with spatial filters. J. Transport Geogr. 2012, 24:198-205.
35. Morán P. The interpretation of statistical maps. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1948, 10:243-251.
36. Morán P. A test for serial independence of residual. Biometrica 1950, 37:178-181.
37. Newman P., Kenworthy J. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook 1989, Gower Publishing, Aldershot, Inglaterra.
38. Newman P., Kenworthy J. Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis: Int. J. Suburban Metrop. Stud. 2006, 2:1. Article 3.
39. Poli C. Rivoluzione traffico. Meno mobilità più comunicazione 2006, Robin Edizioni, Rome.
40. Polzin S.E. The Relationship between Land Use, Urban Form and Vehicle Miles of Travel: The State of Knowledge and Implications for Transportation Planning. Policy White Paper 2004, March, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida.
41. Pouyanne G. Land Use Mix and Daily Mobility. The Case of Bordeaux. Cahiers du GRES 2005-08 2005, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
42. Rodrigue J.P., Comtois C., Slack B. The Geography of Transport Systems 2009, Routledge, New York. Second edition.
43. Salatino M. La dispersione urbana: effetti sul sistema trasporti-territorio. XXVII Conferenza Italiana di Scienze Regionali 2006.
44. Salvetti A. I gradi di dispersione della popolazione (x) e di compattezza degli insediamenti (P). Rapporto sullo stato dell' urbanistica in Italia e sulle politiche urbanistiche e territoriali per gli anni '80 1982, recerca MPI - Iuav, Venezia. G. Astengo (Ed.).
45. TCRP/Transit Cooperative Research Program Cost of Sprawl-2000 2002, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, Report 74.
46. Torres R. La contraurbanización en la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco. Lurralde, investigación y espacio, n° 29 2006.
47. Travisi C., Camagni R., Nijkamp P. Análisis of Environmental Costs of Mobility due to Urban Sprawl - A Modelling Study on Italian Cities 2006, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, n° 06-042/3.
48. Yu N., de Jong M., Storm S., Mi J. Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure: evidence from Chinese regions original research article. J. Transport Geogr. 2013, 28(April):56-66.