The brief implicit asociation test is valid: Experimental evidence

Social Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 449-465

  Yang, Jing ^a   Shi, Yuanyuan ^a   Luo, Yu L L ^a   Shi, Jing ^a   Cai, Huajian ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911418987     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2014.32.5.449     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). A comparative investigation of seven implicit measures of social cognition. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2074556.
2. Blair, I. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261.
3. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061-1071.
4. Cai, H., Fang, X., Yang, Z., & Song, H. (2012). Implicit animosity: An initial validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1651-1674.
5. Chiu, C.-Y., Gries, P., Torelli, C. J., & Cheng, S. Y.-Y. (2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 663-676.
6. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
7. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347-368.
8. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
9. Frantz, C. M., Cuddy, A. J. C., Burnett, M., Ray, H., & Hart, A. (2004). A threat in the computer: The race Implicit Association Test (IAT) as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1611-1624.
10. Friese, M., & Fiedler, K. (2010). Being on the lookout for validity: Comment on Sriram and Greenwald (2009). Experimental Psychology, 57, 228-232.
11. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
12. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test (IAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
13. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test (IAT): I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
14. Greenwald, A. G., Pickrell, J. E., & Farnham, S. D. (2002). Implicit partisanship: Taking sides for no reason. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 367-379.
15. Greenwald, A. G., Smith, C. T., Sriram, N., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Race attitude measures predicted vote in the 2008 U. S. Presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 241-253.
16. Greenwald, A. G., & Sriram, N. (2010). No measure is perfect, but some measures can be quite useful: Response to two comments on the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT). Experimental Psychology, 57, 238-242.
17. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? (Target article, commentaries, and response). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83, 111-135.
18. Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., & Voss, A. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 595-615.
19. Marques, J., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
20. Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Estimating the contributions of association and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 45-69.
21. Nosek, B. A., Bar-Anan, Y., Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT): I. Recommended scoring procedures. Recommended Scoring Procedures. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196002.
22. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413-417.
23. Petróczi, A., Aidman, E. V., Hussain, I., Deshmukh, N., Nepusz, T., Uvacsek, M., et al. (2010). Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping. PLoS ONE, 5, e10457.
24. Pinter, B., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Exploring implicit partisanship: Enigmatic (but genuine) group identification and attraction. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 283-296.
25. Pinter, B., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). A comparison of minimal group induction procedures. Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations, 14, 81-98.
26. Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J. C., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
27. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Figureground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94-106.
28. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165.
29. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2010). It's brief but is it better? An evaluation of the Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT). Experimental Psychology, 57, 233-237.
30. Rudman, L. A., Dohn, M. C., & Fairchild, K. (2007). Implicit self-esteem compensation: Automatic threat defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 798-813.
31. Rüsch, N., Todd, A. R., Bodenhausen, G. V., Olschewski, M., & Corrigan, P. W. (2010). Automatically activated shame reactions and perceived legitimacy of discrimination: A longitudinal study among people with mental illness. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 60-63.
32. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.
33. Sheets, P., Domke, D., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). God and country: The partisan psychology of the presidency, religion, and nation. Political Psychology, 32, 459-484.
34. Shi, J., Shi, Y., Yang, J., & Cai, H. (2013, August). Cultural intrusion influences implicit intergroup attitude. Poster presented at the 121st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.
35. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
36. Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Wolfe, C. T., Fong, C., & Dunn, M. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1139-1152.
37. Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT). Experimental Psychology, 56, 283-294.
38. Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240-249.
39. Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants: An integrated threat theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221-2237.
40. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
41. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. F., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Psychology, 1, 149-177.
42. Tong, J. Y. Y., Pam, P. P.-Z., Kwan, L., & Peng, S. (2011). National feelings or rational dealings? The moderating role of procedural priming on perceptions of cross-border acquisitions. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 743-759.
43. Torelli, C., & Cheng, S. (2011). Cultural meanings of brands and consumption: A window into the cultural psychology of globalization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 251-262.
44. Wittenbrink, B., & Schwarz, N. (2007). Introduction. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 1-13). New York: Guilford.
45. Yang, D. Y.-J., Chiu, C.-Y., Chen, X., Cheng, S. Y. Y., Kwan, L. Y.-Y., Tam, K.-P., & Yeh, K.-H. (2011). Lay psychology of globalization and its social impact. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 677-695.
46. Yang, Y.-J. (2011). Clashes of civilizations: Critical conditions for evocation of hostile attitude toward foreign intrusion of cultural space. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/29633.
47. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.