It's brief but is it better? An evaluation of the brief implicit association test

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 233-237

  Rothermund, Klaus ^a   Wentura, Dirk ^b  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Associations; Implicit association test; Recoding; Salience asymmetries

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREJUDICE; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 77951651407     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000060     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2005). Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 52, 167-179. (Pubitemid 41020136)
2. Bar-Anan, Y., Nosek, B. A., & Vianello, M. (2009). The Sorting Paired Features Task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329-343.
3. Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2006). Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 163-176. (Pubitemid 43192746)
4. Brendl, M., Markman, A., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760-773. (Pubitemid 33597816)
5. Chang, B. P. I., & Mitchell, C. J. (2009). Processing fluency as a source of salience asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2030-2054.
6. De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85. (Pubitemid 38355427)
7. De Houwer, J., Geldof, T., & De Bruycker, E. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 228-239.
8. Gast, A., & Rothermund, K. (in press). When old and frail is not the same. Dissociating category-based and stimulus-based influences on compatibility effects in four implicit measurement methods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
9. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
10. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32. (Pubitemid 44118153)
11. Kinoshita, S., & Peek-O'Leary, M. (2005). Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test (IAT) reflect familiarity or affect? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 442-452. (Pubitemid 41382745)
12. Kinoshita, S., & Peek-O'Leary, M. (2006). Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 2102-2120. (Pubitemid 44727500)
13. McFarland, S. G., & Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483-510. (Pubitemid 36646380)
14. Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift fü r Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107-122. (Pubitemid 33736307)
15. Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180-1192. (Pubitemid 38023945)
16. Mitchell, C. J. (2004). Mere acceptance produces apparent attitude in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 366-373.
17. Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The Go/No-go Association Task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-664.
18. Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416-442.
19. Rothermund, K., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Gast, A., & Wentura, D. (2009). Eliminating the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: The recoding-free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 84-98.
20. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94-106. (Pubitemid 33736306)
21. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165. (Pubitemid 38707129)
22. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry account of the Implicit Association Test: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji, and Klauer (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 426-430. (Pubitemid 41323158)
23. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
24. Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The Brief Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 56, 283-294.
25. Steffens, M. C., & Plewe, I. (2001). Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift fü r Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123-134.
26. Strayer, D. L., & Kramer, A. F. (1994). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318-341.
27. Teige-Mocigemba, S., Klauer, K. C., & Rothermund, K. (2008). Minimizing method-specific variance in the IAT: A single block IAT. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 237-245.
28. Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (2007). Paradigms we live by. A plea for more basic research on the IAT. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 195-215). New York: Guilford Press.