Usability scale for handheld augmented reality

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 167-176

  Santos, Marc Ericson C ^a   Polvi, Jarkko ^a   Taketomi, Takafumi ^a   Yamamoto, Goshiro ^a   Sandor, Christian ^a   Kato, Hirokazu ^a  

^a NARA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Evaluation method; Handheld devices; Usability; User studies

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED REALITY; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; SURVEYS;

CRONBACH'S ALPHAS; EVALUATION METHOD; HAND HELD DEVICE; HANDHELD AUGMENTED REALITIES; SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE MEASURES; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW; USABILITY; USER STUDY;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 84911055312     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2671015.2671019     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. BANGOR, A., KORTUM, P. T., AND MILLER, J. T. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6, 574-594.
2. CRONBACH, L. J., AND MEEHL, P. E. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological bulletin 52, 4, 281.
3. DEY, A., AND SANDOR, C. 2014. Lessons learned: Evaluating visualizations for occluded objects in handheld augmented reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 1011, 704 - 716.
4. DÜNSER, A., GRASSET, R., AND BILLINGHURST, M. 2008. A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies. Human Interface Technology Laboratory New Zealand.
5. DÜNSER, A., BILLINGHURST, M., WEN, J., LEHTINEN, V., AND NURMINEN, A. 2012. Exploring the use of handheld arfor outdoor navigation. Computers & Graphics 36, 8, 1084 - 1095. Graphics Interaction Virtual Environments and Applications 2012.
6. FOWLER, F. J., AND COSENZA, C. 2008. International Handbook of Survey Methodology. Taylor & Francis, ch. Writing Effective Questions, 136-159.
7. GABBARD, J., AND SWAN, J. 2008. Usability engineering for augmented reality: Employing user-based studies to inform design. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 14, 3 (May), 513-525.
8. GERVAUTZ, M., AND SCHMALSTIEG, D. 2012. Anywhere interfaces using handheld augmented reality. Computer 45, 7 (July), 26-31.
9. HART, S. G. 2006. Nasa-task load index (nasa-tlx); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50, Sage Publications, 904-908.
10. HIX, D., GABBARD, J., SWAN, J.E.I., LIVINGSTON, M., HOLLERER, T., JULIER, S., BAILLOT, Y., AND BROWN, D. 2004. A cost-effective usability evaluation progression for novel interactive systems. In System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 10 pp.-.
11. HUANG, W., HUANG, W., DIEFES-DUX, H., AND IMBRIE, P. K. 2006. A preliminary validation of attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction model-based instructional material motivational survey in a computer-based tutorial setting. British Journal of Educational Technology 37, 2, 243-259.
12. KAMARAINEN, A. M., METCALF, S., GROTZER, T., BROWNE, A., MAZZUCA, D., TUTWILER, M. S., AND DEDE, C. 2013. Ecomobile: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education 68, 0, 545 - 556.
13. KROSNICK, J. A., AND PRESSER, S. 2010. Handbook of Survey Research. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ch. Question and Questionnaire Design, 263-313.
14. KRUIJFF, E., SWAN, J., AND FEINER, S. 2010. Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2010 9th IEEE International Symposium on, 3-12.
15. KURKOVSKY, S., KOSHY, R., NOVAK, V., AND SZUL, P. 2012. Current issues in handheld augmented reality. In Communications and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2012 International Conference on, 68-72.
16. LANGLOTZ, T., MOOSLECHNER, S., ZOLLMANN, S., DEGENDORFER, C., REITMAYR, G., AND SCHMALSTIEG, D. 2012. Sketching up the world: in situ authoring for mobile augmented reality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 6, 623-630.
17. LEE, G. A., DUNSER, A., KIM, S., AND BILLINGHURST, M. 2012. Cityviewar: A mobile outdoor ar application for city visualization. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-AMH), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on, 57-64.
18. LEWIS, J. R., AND SAURO, J. 2009. The factor structure of the system usability scale. In Human Centered Design. Springer, 94-103.
19. MESSICK, S. 1990. Validity of test interpretation and use. Tech. rep., Educational Testing Service.
20. MESSICK, S. 1995. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist 50, 9, 741.
21. MULLONI, A., SEICHTER, H., AND SCHMALSTIEG, D. 2011. User experiences with augmented reality aided navigation on phones. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on, 229-230.
22. MULLONI, A., SEICHTER, H., AND SCHMALSTIEG, D. 2011. Handheld augmented reality indoor navigation with activitybased instructions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, New York, NY, USA, MobileHCI '11, 211- 220.
23. NIELSEN, J. 1994. Usability Engineering. Elsevier.
24. OLSSON, T., AND SALO, M. 2011. Online user survey on current mobile augmented reality applications. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on, 75-84.
25. PILKE, E. M. 2004. Flow experiences in information technology use. International journal of human-computer studies 61, 3, 347-357.
26. RADHAKRISHNA, R. B. 2007. Tips for developing and testing questionnaires/instruments. Journal of Extension 45, 1, 1-4.
27. REKIMOTO, J. 1997. A magnifying glass approach to augmented reality systems. Presence 6, 4, 399-412.
28. RYU, Y. S., AND SMITH-JACKSON, T. L. 2006. Reliability and validity of the mobile phone usability questionnaire (mpuq). Journal of Usability Studies 2, 1, 39-53.
29. SANTOS, M., CHEN, A., TAKETOMI, T., YAMAMOTO, G., MIYAZAKI, J., AND KATO, H. 2014. Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on 7, 1 (Jan), 38-56.
30. SCHALL, G., MENDEZ, E., KRUIJFF, E., VEAS, E., JUNGHANNS, S., REITINGER, B., AND SCHMALSTIEG, D. 2009. Handheld augmented reality for underground infrastructure visualization. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 4, 281-291.
31. SWAN, J., AND GABBARD, J. L., 2003. Perceptual and ergonomic issues in mobile augmented reality for urban operations.
32. VEAS, E., AND KRUIJFF, E. 2008. Vesp'r: design and evaluation of a handheld ar device. In Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2008. ISMAR 2008. 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on, 43- 52.
33. VEAS, E. E., AND KRUIJFF, E. 2010. Handheld devices for mobile augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, ACM, 3.
34. VEAS, E., GRASSET, R., FERENCIK, I., GRNEWALD, T., AND SCHMALSTIEG, D. 2013. Mobile augmented reality for environmental monitoring. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 7, 1515-1531.
35. WHITE, S., AND FEINER, S. 2009. Sitelens: Situated visualization techniques for urban site visits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, CHI '09, 1117-1120.