Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited

9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2010: Science and Technology, ISMAR 2010 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3-12

  Kruijff, Ernst ^a   Swan II, J Edward ^b   Feiner, Steven ^c  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; CR categories and subject descriptors: H.5.1 information interfaces and presentation : multimedia information systems artificial, augmented, and virtual realities; H.5.2 information interfaces and presentation : user interfaces ergonomics, evaluation methodology, screen design; Handheld devices; Human perception; Mobile computing

Indexed keywords

DESCRIPTORS; HAND HELD DEVICE; HANDHELDS; HUMAN PERCEPTION; PROJECTOR-CAMERA SYSTEM; SCREEN DESIGN; VISUAL-PROCESSING;

AUGMENTED REALITY; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; ERGONOMICS; HAND HELD COMPUTERS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MOBILE COMPUTING; USER INTERFACES;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 78651110736     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643530     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (61)

1. Azuma, R. and C. Furmanski. Evaluating Label Placement for Augmented Reality View Management, in Proc. of the 2nd IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003.
2. Bell, B., S. Feiner, and T. Höllerer. View Management for Virtual and Augmented Reality, in Proc. of the annual ACM Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology, 2001.
3. Berger, M. Resolving Occlusion in Augmented Reality: a Contour Based Approach without 3D Reconstruction, in Proc. the IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1997.
4. Bimber, O., A. Emmerling, and T. Klemmer, Embedded entertainment with smart projectors, Computer, 2005, 38(1): 48-55.
5. Bimber, O. and R. Raskar, Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. 2005: A K Peters, Ltd. .
6. Cakmakci, O. and J. Rolland, Head-worn displays: a review, Journal of Display Technology, 2006, 2(3): 99-216.
7. Cutting, J., Reconceiving Perceptual Space, in Perceiving Pictures: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Pictorial Space, H. Hecht, M. Atherton, and R. Schwartz, Editors, 2003, MITPress: Cambridge. 215-238.
8. Drascic, D. and P. Milgram, Perceptual Issues in Augmented Reality, SPIE 1996, 12653: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III: 123-134.
9. Ellis, S. and B. Menges, Localization of virtual objects in the near visual field., Human Factors, 1988, 40(3): 415-431.
10. Ellis, S., A. Wolfram, and B. Adelstein. Three Dimensional Tracking in Augmented Environments: User Performance Trade-Offs Between System Latency and Update Rate, in Proc. of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002.
11. Elmqvist, N., U. Assarsson, and P. Tsigas. Employing Dynamic Transparency for 3D Occlusion Management: Design Issues and Evaluation, in Proc. of INTERACT 2007, 2007.
12. Feiner, S., B. Macintyre, and D. Seligmann. Knowledge-Based Augmented Reality, Communications of the ACM, 1993, 36(7): 53-61.
13. Feiner, S., et al. A Touring Machine: Prototyping 3D Mobile Augmented Reality Systems for Exploring the Urban Environment, in Proc. of the First Int. Symp. on Wearable Computers 1997.
14. Flatla, D. and C. Gutwin. Individual models of color differentiation to improve interpretability of information visualization, in Proc. of the 28th International Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2010.
15. Fraser, B., C. Murphy, and F. Bunting, Real World Color Management. 2004: Peachpit Press.
16. Gabbard, J. and J. Swan II, Usability Engineering for Augmented Reality: Employing User-Based Studies to Inform Design, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2008, 14(3): 513-525.
17. Gabbard, J., et al., More Than Meets the Eye: An Engineering Study to Empirically Examine the Blending of Real and Virtual Color Spaces, in Proc. of IEEE Virtual Reality 2010, 2010.
18. Gerbino, W. and C. Fantoni, Interposition, perspective, and the principle of minimal depth, Perception, 2007, 36: ECVP Abstract Supplement: 181.
19. Grossberg, M., et al. Making one object look like another: controlling appearance using a projector-camera system, in IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004.
20. Guehring, J., Dense 3D Surface Acquisition by Structured Light Using Off-the-Shelf Components in Proc. of Videometrics and Optical Methods for 3D Shape Measurings (SPIE), 2001.
21. Gupta, D., An Empirical Study of the Effects of Context-Switch, Object Distance, and Focus Depth on Human Performance in Augmented Reality. 2004, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
22. House, D., A. Blair, and C. Ware, An Approach to the Perceptual Optimization of Complex Visualizations, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2006, 12(4): 509-521. (Pubitemid 43824563)
23. Jacobs, K. and C. Loscos, Classification of illumination methods for mixed-reality, Computer Graphics Forum, 2006, 25(1): 29-51.
24. Jefferson, L. and R. Harvey, An Interface to support color blind computer users, in Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007.
25. Jones, J., et al. The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Motion Parallax on Egocentric Depth Perception, in Proc. of the Symp. on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 2008.
26. Kalkofen, D., E. Mendez, and D. Schmalstieg. Interactive Focus and Context Visualization for Augmented Reality, in Proc. of 6th IEEE and ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2007.
27. Karitsuka, T. and K. Sato. A Wearable Mixed Reality with an On-Board Projector, in Proc. of the 2nd IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003.
28. Kjelldahl, L. and M. Prime, A study on how depth perception is affected by different presentation methods of 3D objects on a 2D display Computers and Graphics, 1995, 19(2): 199-202.
29. Klein, G. and T. Drummond. Sensor Fusion and Occlusion Refinement for Tablet-Based AR, in Proc. of the 3rd IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2004.
30. Klein, G. and D. Murray. Compositing for Small Cameras, in Proc. of the 7th Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2008.
31. Knapp, J. and J. Loomis, Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays Is Not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2004, 13(5): 572-577.
32. Lappin, J., A. Shelton, and J. Rieser, Environmental context influences visually perceived distance, Perception and Psychophysics, 2006, 68: 571-581.
33. Lerotics, M., et al. Pq-space based non-photorealistic rendering for augmented reality, in Proc. of the 10th international Conf. on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 2007.
34. Leykin, A. and M. Tuceryan, Automatic Determination of Text Readability over Textured Backgrounds for Augmented Reality Systems, in Proc. of the 3rd IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2004.
35. Linn, M. and A. Petersen, Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis, Child development, 1985, 56: 1479-1498.
36. Livingston, M., Z. Ai, and J. Decker. A user study towards understanding stereo perception in head-worn augmented reality displays, in Proc. of the 8th IEEE Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2009.
37. Livingston, M., J. Barrow, and C. Sibley, Quantification of Contrast Sensitivity and Color Perception using Head-worn Augmented Reality Displays, in Proc. of IEEE Virtual Reality, 2009.
38. Livingston, M., et al. Resolving Multiple Occluded Layers in Augmented Reality in Proc. of the 2nd IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2003.
39. Mantiuk, R., et al. High Dynamic Range Imaging Pipeline: Perception-motivated Representation of Visual Content, in Proc. of the Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XII, IS&T/SPIE's Symp. on Electronic Imaging, 2007.
40. Mon-Williams, M. and J. Treselian, Ordinal Depth Information from Accommodation?, Ergonomics, 2000, 43(3): 391-404.
41. Okumura, B., M. Kanbara, and N. Yokoya, Augmented Reality Based on Estimation of Defocusing and Motion Blurring from Captured Images, in Proc. of the 5th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2006.
42. Pentland, A., Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST, Perception & Psychophysics, 1980, 28(4): 377-379.
43. Peterson, S., M. Axholt, and S. Ellis. Label segregation by remapping stereoscopic depth in far-field augmented reality, in Proc. of the 7th IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2008.
44. Piekarski, W., R. Smith, and B. Thomas. Designing Backpacks for High Fidelity Mobile Outdoor Augmented Reality, in Proc. of the 3rd IEEE/ACM Int. Symp. on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2004.
45. Raskar, R., Greg Welch, et al. The Office of the Future: A Unified Approach to Image-Based Modeling and Spatially Immersive Displays, in Proc. of SIGGRAPH'98, 1998.
46. Rastogi, A., Design of an interface for teleoeperation in unstructured environments using augmented reality displays. 1996, University of Toronto
47. Reinhard, E., et al., High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display and Image-Based Lighting. 2006: Morgan Kaufmann.
48. Robinson, M. and K. Robbins, Toward perceptual enhancement of multiple intersecting surfaces, in Proc. of SPIE 2005, 2005.
49. Rosenholtz, R., Y. Li, and L. Nakano, Measuring visual clutter, Journal of Vision, 2007, 7(2): 1-22.
50. Sandor, C., et al. Egocentric Space-Distorting Visualizations for Rapid Environment Exploration in Mobile Mixed Reality, in Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Virtual Reality, 2010.
51. Seetzen, H., et al., High dynamic range display systems, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2004, 23(3): 760-768. (Pubitemid 40163780)
52. Shimojo, S. and L. Shams, Sensory Modalities are not Separate Modalities: Plasticity and Interactions, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2001, 11: 505-509. (Pubitemid 32739179)
53. Stauder, J., Augmented Reality with Automatic Illumination Control Incorporating Ellipsoidal Models, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 1999, 1(2): 136-143.
54. Stone, M., A Field Guide to Digital Color. 2003: A K Peters.
55. Swan II, J., D. Hix, and J. Gabbard, Perceptual and Ergonomic Issues in Mobile Augmented Reality for Urban Operations. 2003, Naval Research Laboratory.
56. Swan II, J., et al., Egocentric Depth Judgments in Optical, See-Through Augmented Reality, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2007, 13(3): 429-442.
57. Thompson, W., et al., Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments?, Presence: Teleoperatore and Virtual Environments, 2004, 13(5): 560-571.
58. Thropp, J. and J. Chen, The Effects of Slow Frame Rates on Human Performance. 2006, Army Research Laboratory.
59. Tsuda, T., et al. Visualization methods for outdoor see-through vision, in Proc. of the 2005Int. Conf. on Augmented Tele-Existence, 2005.
60. Ware, C., Information Visualization: Perception for Design. 2000, New York: Morgan Kauffman.
61. Wloka, M. and B. Anderson. Resolving occlusion in augmented reality, in Proc. of the 1995 Symp. on interactive 3D Graphics, 1995.