Seismic structure of the Central US crust and shallow upper mantle: Uniqueness of the Reelfoot Rift

Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Volumn 402, Issue C, 2014, Pages 157-166

  Pollitz, Fred F ^a   Mooney, Walter D ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mantle; New Madrid Seismic Zone; Seismic surface waves

Indexed keywords

SEISMIC WAVES; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; SURFACE WAVES; VELOCITY;

LOW VELOCITY ZONES; LOW-VELOCITY ANOMALY; MANTLE; NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONES; SEDIMENTARY SEQUENCE; SEISMIC STRUCTURE; SEISMIC SURFACE WAVE; SEISMIC VELOCITIES;

SEISMOLOGY;

EID: 84911029362     PISSN: 0012821X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.05.042     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abt D., Fischer K.M., French S.W., Ford H.A., Yuan H., Romanowicz B. North American lithospheric discontinuity structure imaged by Ps and Sp receiver functions. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115:B09301. 10.1029/2009JB006914
2. Al-Shukri H.J., Lemmer R.E., Mahdi H.H., Connelly J.B. Spatial and temporal characteristics of Paleoseismic features in the Southern terminus of the New Madrid Seismic Zone in Eastern Arkansas. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2005, 76:502-511.
3. Allen D.J., Hinze W.J., Cannon W.F. Drainage, topographic, and gravity anomalies in the Lake Superior region. evidence for a 1100Ma mantle plume. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1992, 19:2118-2122.
4. Bedle H., van der Lee S. Fossil flat-slab subduction beneath the Illinois Basin, USA. Tectonophysics 2006, 424:53-68.
5. Bose K., Ganguly J. Experimental and theoretical studies of the stabilities of talc, antigorite and phase A at high pressures with applications to subduction processes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1995, 136:109-121.
6. Braile L.W., Keller G.R., Hinze W.J., Lidiak E.G. An ancient rift complex and its relation to contemporary seismicity in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Tectonics 1982, 1:225-237.
7. Burov E., Guillou-Frottier L., d'Acremont E., Le Pourhiet L., Cloetingh S. Plume head-lithosphere interactions near intra-continental plate boundaries. Tectonophysics 2007, 434:15-38.
8. Calais E., Freed A.M., Van Arsdale R., Stein S. Triggering of New Madrid seismicity by late-Pleistocene erosion. Nature 2010, 466:608-612.
9. Campbell D.L. Investigation of the stress-concentration mechanism for intraplate earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1978, 5:477-479.
10. Chen C.-W., Rondenay S., Evans R.L., Snyder D.B. Geophysical detection of relict metasomatism from an Archean (3.5Ga) subduction zone. Science 2009, 326:1089-1091.
11. Chu R., Schmandt B., Helmberger D.V. Upper mantle P velocity structure beneath the Midwestern United States derived from triplicated waveforms. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2012, 13:Q0AK04. 10.1029/2011GC003818
12. Chulick G.S., Mooney W.D. Seismic structure of the crust and uppermost mantle of North America and adjacent oceanic basins. a synthesis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2002, 92:2478-2492.
13. Dayem K.E., Houseman G.A., Molnar P. Localization of shear along a lithospheric strength discontinuity. application of a continuous deformation model to the boundary between Tibet and the Tarim Basin. Tectonics 2009, 28:TC3002. 10.1029/2008TC002264
14. Dziewonski A.M., Chou T.-A., Woodhouse J.H. Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J. Geophys. Res. 1981, 86:2825-2852.
15. Eaton D., Frederiksen A. Seismic evidence for convective-driven motion of the North American plate. Nature 2007, 446:428-431.
16. Forsyth, D.W., Li, A., 2005. Array-analysis of two-dimensional variations in surface wave phase velocity and azimuthal anisotropy in the presence of multipathing interference. In: Levander, A., Nolet, G. (Eds.), AGU Geophysical Monograph, vol. 187, Washington, DC, pp. 81-98.
17. Forsyth D.W., Webb S.C., Dorman L.M., Shen Y. Phase velocities of Rayleigh waves in the MELT experiment on the East Pacific rise. Science 1998, 22:1235-1238.
18. Forte A.M., Mitrovica J.X., Moucha R., Simons N.A., Grand S.P. Descent of ancient Farallon slab drives localized mantle flow below the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34. 10.1029/2006GL027895.
19. Frankel A., Smalley R., Paul J. Significant motions between GPS sites in the New Madrid region. implications for seismic hazard. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2012, 102:479-489.
20. Friederich W., Hunzinger S., Wielandt E. A note on the interpretation of seismic surface waves over three-dimensional structures. Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 143:335-339.
21. Friederich W., Wielandt E. Interpretation of seismic surface waves in regional networks. joint estimation of wavefield geometry and local phase velocity-method and tests. Geophys. J. Int. 1995, 120:731-744.
22. Frost D.J. The stability of hydrous mantle phases. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2006, 62:243-271.
23. Grana J.P., Richardson R.M. Tectonic stress within the New Madrid Seismic Zone. J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101:5445-5458.
24. Grollimund B., Zoback M.D. Did deglaciation trigger intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid Seismic Zone?. Geology 2001, 29:175-178.
25. 2O on mantle wedge melting. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 249:74-89.
26. Hacker B., Luffi P., Lutkov V., Minaev V., Ratschbacher L., Plank T., Ducea M., Patino-Douce A., McWilliams M., Metcalf J. Near-ultrahigh pressure processing of continental crust. Miocene crustal xenoliths from the Pamir. J. Petrol. 2005, 46:1661-1687.
27. Harrison R.W., Hoffman D., Vaughn J.D., Palmer J.R., Wiscombe C.L., McGeehin J.P., Stephenson W.J., Odum J.K., Williams R.A., Forman S.L. An example of neotectonism in a continental interior-Thebes Gap, Midcontinent, United States. Tectonophysics 1999, 305:399-417.
28. Hildenbrand T.G. Rift structure of the northern Mississippi embayment from analysis of gravity and magnetic data. J. Geophys. Res. 1985, 90:12607-12622.
29. Hildenbrand, T.G., Hendricks, J.D., 1995. Geophysical setting of the Reelfoot Rift and relation between rift structures and the New Madrid Seismic Zone. In: Shedlock, K.M., Johnson, A.C. (Eds.), Investigations of the New Madrid Seismic Zone, vol. 1538-E. U.S. Geological Survey, pp. 1-30.
30. Hough S.E. Large 19th century earthquakes in eastern/central North America. Historical Seismology 2008, 351-367. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. J. Frechet, M. Meghraoui, M. Stucchi, J. Vogt (Eds.).
31. Johnston A.C. Seismic movement assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions; III, New Madrid 1811-1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755. Geophys. J. Int. 1996, 126:314-344.
32. Kenner S.J., Segall P. A mechanical model for intraplate earthquakes. application to the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Science 2000, 289:2329-2332. 10.1126/science.289.5488.2329
33. Kim W.-Y. 18 June 2002 Caborn, Indiana earthquake. reactivation of Ancient Rift in the Wabash Valley Seismic Zone?. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2003, 93:2201-2211.
34. Langston C.A., DeShon H., Horton S.P., Powell C.A., Thomas W.A., Ammon C.J., Herrmann R.B. Scientific problems and lithospheric targets. the northern embayment lithosphere experiment. Geol Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 2011, 43(5):436.
35. Liang C., Langston C.A. Ambient seismic noise tomography and structure of eastern North America. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113:B03309. 10.1029/2007JB005350
36. Lin F.C., Ritzwoller M.H., Snieder R. Eikonal tomography. surface wave tomography by phase front tracking across a regional broad-band array. Geophys. J. Int. 2009, 177:1091-1110.
37. Liu L., Zoback M.D. Lithospheric strength and intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Tectonics 1997, 16:5585-5595. 10.1029/97TC01467
38. Long L.T. Speculations concerning southeastern earthquakes, mafic intrusions, gravity anomalies, and stress amplification. Earthquake Notes 1976, 47:29-35.
39. Mainprice D., Le Page Y., Rodgers J., Joanna P. Ab initio elastic properties of talc from 0 to 12GPa. interpretation of seismic velocities at mantle pressures and prediction of auxetic behaviour at low pressure. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2008, 274:327-338.
40. Marshak S., Pavlis G.L., Hamburger M.W., Hersh G., Larson T., Shoemaker K. The Ozark-Illinois-Kentucky (OIINK) Earthscope Project. characterizing cratonic-platform lithosphere in North America's Midcontinent. Geol Soc. Am. Abstr. Prog. 2011, 43(5):363.
41. Mazzotti S. Geodynamic models for earthquake studies in intraplate North America. Continental Intraplate Earthquakes. Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues 2007, vol. 425:17-33. Geological Society of America.
42. McKenna, J., Stein, S., Stein, C.A., 2007. Is the New Madrid Seismic Zone hotter and weaker than its surroundings? In: Stein, S., Mazzotti, S. (Eds.), Continental Intraplate Earthquakes: Science, Hazard, and Policy Issues, vol. 425. Geological Society of America Special Paper, pp. 167-175.
43. Merino M., Stein S., Liu M., Okal E.A. Comparison of seismicity rates in the New Madrid and Wabash Valley seismic zones. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2010, 81(6):951-954.
44. Moidaki M., Gao S.S., Liu K.H., Atekwana E. Crustal thickness and Moho sharpness beneath the Midcontinent rift from receiver functions. Res. Geophys. 2013, 3:e1. 10.4081/4538
45. Molnar P., Dayem K.E. Major intracontinental strike-slip faults and contrasts in lithospheric strength. Geosphere 2010, 6:444-467.
46. Mooney W.D., Andrews M.C., Ginzburg A., Peters D.A., Hamilton R.M. Crustal structure of the northern Mississippi Embayment and comparison with other continental rift zones. Tectonophysics 1983, 94:327-348.
47. Mooney W.D., Kaban M.K. The North American upper mantle. density, composition, and evolution. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115:B12424. 10.1029/2010JB000866
48. Moore D.E., Lockner D.A. Comparative deformation behavior of minerals in serpentinized ultramafic rock. application to the slab-mantle interface in subduction zones. Int. Geol. Rev. 2007, 49:401-415.
49. Neil E.A., Houseman G.A. Geodynamics of the Tarim Basin and the Tian Shan in Central Asia. Tectonics 1997, 571:571-584. 10.1029/97TC01413
50. Newman A., Stein S., Weber J., Engeln J., Mao A., Dixon T. Slow deformation and lower seismic hazard at the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Science 1999, 284:619-621.
51. 2O in subduction zones. Am. Mineral. 1995, 80:998-1003.
52. Peacock, S.M., Hyndman, 1999. Hydrous minerals in the mantle wedge and the maximum depth of subduction thrust earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 2517-2520.
53. Pollitz F., Bürgmann R., Thatcher W. The M7.2 2010 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake illuminates rheological mantle heterogeneity. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2012, 13:Q06002. 10.1029/2012GC004139
54. Pollitz F.F. Regional velocity structure in northern California from inversion of scattered seismic surface waves. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104:15043-15072.
55. Pollitz F.F. Viscoelastic shear zone model of a strike-slip earthquake cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106:26541-26560.
56. Pollitz F.F. Observations and interpretation of fundamental mode Rayleigh wavefields recorded by the Transportable Array (USArray). J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113:B10311. 10.1029/2007JB005556
57. Pollitz F.F., Kellogg L., Bürgmann R. Sinking mafic body in a reactivated lower crust. a mechanism for stress concentration at the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2001, 91:1882-1897.
58. Pollitz F.F., Snoke J.A. Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity maps and three-dimensional shear-velocity structure of the western US from local non-plane surface-wave tomography. Geophys. J. Int. 2010, 180:1153-1169.
59. Sbar M.L., Sykes L.R. Contemporary compressive stress and seismicity in eastern North America. an example of intraplate tectonics. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1973, 84:1861-1882.
60. Schweig E.S., Ellis M.A. Reconciling short recurrence intervals with minor deformation in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Science 1994, 264:1308-1311.
61. Shen W., Ritzwoller M.H., Schulte-Pelkum V. A 3-D model of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the central and western US by joint inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion. J. Geophys. Res. 2013, 10.1029/2012JB009602.
62. Shen, W., Ritzwoller, M.H., Schulte-Pelkum, V., 2013. Crustal and uppermost mantle structure in the central US encompassing the Midcontinental Rift. J. Geophys. Res., submitted for publication.
63. Stein S., van der Lee S., Jurdy D., Stein C., Wiens D., Wysession M., Revenaugh J., Frederiksen A., Darbyshire F., Bollman T., Lodewyk J., Wolin E., Merino M., Tekverk K. Learning from failure. the SPREE Mid-Continent Rift experiment. GSA Today 2011, 21:5-7.
64. Stuart W.D., Hildenbrand T.G., Simpson R.W. Stressing of the New Madrid Seismic Zone by a lower crust detachment fault. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102:27623-27633.
65. Taylor, S., 1989. Geophysical framework of the Appalachians and adjacent Grenville province. In: Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, vol. 172. Geological Society of America Memoir, pp. 317-348.
66. Thomas W.A. Tectonic inheritance at a continental margin. GSA Today 2006, 16:4-11.
67. Thomas W.A. Interactions between the southern Appalachian-Ouachita orogenic belt and basement faults in the orogenic footwall and foreland. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 2010, 206:897-916.
68. Tromp J., Dahlen F.A. Variational principles for surface wave propagation on a laterally heterogeneous Earth-III. potential representation. Geophys. J. Int. 1993, 112:195-209.
69. Trønnes R.G. Stability range and decomposition of potassic richterite and phlogopite end members at 5-15GPa. Mineral. Petrol. 2002, 74:129-148.
70. Tuttle M., Schweig E.S., Sims J.D., Cafferty R.H., Wolf L.W., Haynes M.L. The earthquake potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2002, 92:2080-2089.
71. Ulmer, P., Trommsdorff, V., 1999. Phase relations of hydrous mantle subducting to 300km. In: Fei, Y., Bertka, C.M., Mysen, B.O. (Eds.), Mantle petrology: field observations and high pressure experimentation, vol. 6. Geochemical Society Special Publication, pp. 259-281.
72. Van Arsdale, R., 2009a. Late Proterozoic and Early Cambrian rifting of the southeastern United States. In: Coward, M.P., Dewey, J.F., Hancock, P.L. (Eds.), Adventures Through Deep Time: The Central Mississippi River Valley and Its Earthquakes, vol. 255. Geological Society of America, pp. 29-32.
73. Van Arsdale, R., 2009b. Pangea rips apart-the formation of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Coward, M.P., Dewey, J.F., Hancock, P.L. (Eds.), Adventures Through Deep Time: The Central Mississippi River Valley and Its Earthquakes, vol. 255. Geological Society of America, pp. 53-63.
74. Van Arsdale R., Cox R. The Mississippi's curious origins. Nat. Geosci. 2007, (January):33-39.
75. Van Schmus, W.R., Bickford, M.E., Turek, A., 1996. Proterozoic geology of the east-central Midcontinent basement. In: Basement and Basins of Eastern North America, vol. 308. Geological Society of America, pp. 7-32.
76. Villemaire, M., Darbyshire, F.A., Bastow, I.D., 2012. P-wave tomography of Eastern North America: evidence for mantle evolution from Archean to Phanerozoic, and modification during subsequent hotspot tectonism. J. Geophys. Res. 117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009639.
77. Vilotte J.P., Madariaga R., Daignie'res M., Zienkiewicz O.C. Numerical study of continental collision. influence of buoyancy forces and an initial stiff inclusion. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1986, 84:279-310.
78. Whitmeyer S.J., Karlstrom K.E. Tectonic model for the Proterozoic evolution of North America. Geosphere 2007, 3:220-259.
79. Yang Y., Forsyth D.W. Rayleigh wave phase velocities, small-scale convection, and azimuthal anisotropy beneath southern California. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111. 10.1029/2005JB004180.
80. Yang Y., Ritzwoller M.H., Lin F.C., Moschetti M.P., Shapiro N.M. Structure of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the western United States revealed by ambient noise and earthquake tomography. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113:B12310. 10.1029/2008JB005833
81. Zhang Q., Sandvol E., Liu M. Lithospheric velocity structure of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. a joint teleseismic and local P tomographic study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, 36:L11305. 10.1029/2009GL037687
82. Zhou Y., Dahlen F.A., Nolet G. Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for surface wave observables. Geophys. J. Int. 2004, 158:142-168.
83. Zoback M.L., Zoback M.D. State of stress in the conterminous United States. J. Geophys. Res. 1980, 85:6113-6156.
84. Zoback M.L., Zoback M.D. Tectonic stress field of the continental United States. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 1989, 172:523-539.