Tectonic stress within the New Madrid seismic zone

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 5445-5458

  Grana, Jeffrey P ^a,b   Richardson, Randall M ^a  

^a The University of Arizona   (United States)

^b BP EXPLORATION   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; INTRAPLATE SETTING; RIFT PILLOW; SEISMICITY; STRESS;

USA, NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE;

EID: 0029731643     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/95jb03255     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Andrews, M. C., W. D. Mooney, and R. P. Meyer, The relocation of microearthquakes in the northern Mississippi embayment, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 10,233-10,236, 1985.
2. Basham, P. W., A Paleozoic-Mesozoic framework for seismic hazard assessment in eastern North America, in Current Research, Part F, Pap. Geol. Surv. Can., 89-1F, 45-50, 1989.
3. Birch, F., Compressibility; elastic constants, in Handbook of Physical Constants, edited by S. P. Clark Jr., Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 97, 97-173, 1966.
4. Bott, M. H. P., and N. J. Kusznir, The origin of tectonic stress in the lithosphere, Tectonophysics, 105, 1-13, 1984.
5. Braile, L. W., G. R. Keller, W. J. Hinze, and E. G. Lidiak, An ancient rift complex and its relation to contemporary seismicity in the New Madrid seismic zone, Tectonics, 1, 225-237, 1982a.
6. Braile, L. W., W. J. Hinze, G. R. Keller, and E. G. Lidiak, The northeastern extension of the New Madrid seismic zone, in Investigations of the New Madrid, Missouri, Earthquake Region, edited by F. A. Mckeown and L. C. Pakiser, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1236, 175-184, 1982b.
7. Braile, L. W., W. J. Hinze, G. R. Keller, E. G. Lidiak, and J. L. Sexton, Tectonic Development of the New Madrid Rift Complex, Mississippi Embayment, North America, Teclonophysics, 131, 1-21, 1986.
8. Chapman, D. S., Thermal gradients in the continental crust, in The Nature of the Lower Continental Crust, edited by J. B. Dawson, D. A. Carswell, J. Hall, and K. H. Wedepohl, Spec. Publ. Geol. Soc. Am., 24, 63-70, 1986.
9. Chen, W.-P., A brief update on the focal depths of intracontinental earthquakes and their correlations with heat flow and tectonic age, Seismol. Res. Lett., 59, 263-272, 1988.
10. Chen, W.-P., and P. Molnar, Focal depths of intracontinental and intraplate earthquakes and their implications for the thermal and mechanical properties of the lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 4183-4214, 1983.
11. Chiu, J.-M., Y. T. Yang, K. C. Chen, Z. S. Liaw, S. C. Chiu, A. C. Johnston, R. Herrmann, and the PANDA Group, 3-dimensional fault zone geometry and sedimentary basin configuration in the central New Madrid seismic zone determined from PANDA data (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 72(44), Fall Meet. Suppl., 429, 1991.
12. Chiu, J.-M., A. C. Johnston, and Y. T. Yang, Imaging the active faults of the central New Madrid seismic zone using PANDA array data, Seismol. Res. Lett., 63, 375-394, 1992.
13. Crone, A. J., F. A. McKeown, S. T. Harding, R. M. Hamilton, D. P. Russ, and M. D. Zoback, Structure of the New Madrid seismic source zone in southeastern Missouri and northeastern Arkansas, Geology, 13, 547-550, 1985.
14. Cushing, E. M., E. H. Boswell, and R. L. Hosman, General geology of the Mississippi embayment, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 448-B, 28 pp., 1964.
15. De Rito, R. F., F. A. Cozzarelli, and D. S. Hodge, Mechanism of subsidence of ancient cratonic rift basins, Tectonophysics, 94, 141-168, 1983.
16. De Rito, R. F., F. A. Cozzarelli, and D. S. Hodge, A forward approach to the problem of nonlinear viscoelasticity and the thickness of the mechanical lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 8295-8313, 1986.
17. Dewey, J. W., Midplate seismicity exterior to former rift basins, Seismol. Res. Lett., 59, 213-218, 1988.
18. Ervin, C. P., and L. D. McGinnis, Reelfoot Rift: Reactivated precursor to the Mississippi embayment, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 86, 1287-1295, 1975.
19. Ginzburg, A., W. D. Mooney, A. W. Walter, W. J. Lutter, and J. H. Healy, Deep structure of northern Mississippi embayment, AAPG Bull., 67, 2091-2046, 1983.
20. Gomberg, J., Tectonic deformation in the New Madrid seismic zone: Inferences from boundary element modeling, Seismol. Res. Lett., 63, 407-426, 1992.
21. Gomberg, J., and M. Ellis, Topography and tectonics of the central New Madrid seismic zone: Results of numerical experiments using a three-dimensional boundary element program, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 20,299-22,310, 1994.
22. Herrmann, R. B., Surface wave focal mechanisms for eastern North American earthquakes with tectonic implications, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 3543-3552, 1979.
23. Hermann, R. B., and J.-A. Canas, Focal mechanism studies in the New Madrid seismic zone. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 68, 1095-1102, 1978.
24. Hildenbrand, T. G., Rift structure of the northern Mississippi embayment from the analysis of gravity and magnetic data, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 12,607-12,622, 1985.
25. Hildenbrand, T. G., M. F. Kane, and J. D. Hendricks, Magnetic basement in the upper Mississippi embayment region - A preliminary report, in Investigations of the New Madrid, Missouri, Earthquakes Region, edited by F. A. Mckeown and L. C. Pakiser, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1236, 39-53, 1982.
26. Himes, W. J., W. Stauder, and R. B. Herrmann, Indication of active faults in the New Madrid seismic zone from precise location of hypocenters, Seismol. Res. Lett., 59, 123-131, 1988.
27. Hinze, W. J., L. W. Braile, G. R. Keller, and E. G. Lidiak, Models for midcontinent tectonism, in Continental Tectonics, pp. 73-83, Nat. Acad. of Sci., Washington, D. C., 1980.
28. Hinze, W. J., L. W. Braile, G. R. Keller, and E. G. Lidiak, Models for midcontinent tectonism: An update, Rev. Geophys., 26, 699-717, 1988.
29. Johnston, A. C., Seismicity of "stable continental interiors," in Earthquakes at North-Atlantic Passive Margins: Neotectonics and Postglacial Rebound, edited by S. Gregersen and P. W. Basham, pp. 299-327, Kluwer Acad., Norwell, Mass., 1989.
30. Johnston, A., and L. R. Kantor, Earthquakes in stable continental crust, Sci. Am., 262, 68-75, 1990.
31. Kane, M. F., Correlation of major eastern earthquake centers with mafic/ultramafic basement masses, in Studies Related to the Charleston, South Carolina, Earthquake of 1886 - A Preliminary Report, edited by D. W. Rankin, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1028-O, 199-204, 1977.
32. Kane, M. F., T. G. Hildenbrand, and J. D. Hendricks, Model for the tectonic evolution of the Mississippi embayment and its contemporary seismicity, Geology, 9, 563-568, 1981.
33. Karner, G. D., and A. B. Watts, Gravity anomalies and flexure of the lithosphere at mountain ranges, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 10,449-10,474, 1983.
34. Kirby, S. H., and A. K. Kronenberg, Rheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics, Rev. Geophys., 25, 1219-1244, 1987a.
35. Kirby, S. H., and A. K. Kronenberg, Correction to "Rheology of the lithosphere: Selected topics," Rev. Geophys., 25, 1680-1681, 1987b.
36. Kusznir, N. J., Lithosphere response to externally and internally derived stresses: A viscoelastic stress guide with amplification, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 70, 399-414, 1982.
37. Kusznir, N. J., The distribution of stress with depth in the lithosphere: Thermo-rheological and geodynamic constraints, in Tectonic Stress in the Lithosphere, edited by R. B. Whitmarsh, M. H. P. Bott, J. D. Fairhead, and N. J. Kusznir, pp. 95-110, Roy. Soc. of London, 1991.
38. Kusznir, N. J., and M. H. P. Bott, Stress concentration in the upper lithosphere caused by underlying visco-elastic creep, Tectonophysics, 43, 247-256, 1977.
39. Kusznir, N. J., and G. Karner, Dependence of the flexural rigidity of the continental lithosphere on rheology and temperature, Nature, 316, 138-142, 1985.
40. Kusznir, N. J., and R. G. Park, Continental lithosphere strength: The critical role of lower crustal deformation, in The Nature of the Lower Continental Crust, edited by J. B. Dawson, D. A. Carswell, J. Hall, and K. H. Wedepohl, Spec. Publ. Geol. Soc. Am., 24, 79-93, 1986.
41. Liu, L., M. D. Zoback, and P. Segall, Rapid intraplate strain accumulation in the New Madrid seismic zone, Science, 257, 1666-1669, 1992.
42. Long, L. T., Speculations concerning southeastern earthquakes, mafic intrusions, gravity anomalies, and stress amplification, Earthquake Notes, 47, 29-35, 1976.
43. McGarr, A., On the state of lithospheric stress in the absence of applied tectonic forces, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 13,609-13,617, 1988.
44. McGarr, A., and N. C. Gay, State of stress in the Earth's crust, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 6,405-436, 1978.
45. McGinnis, L. D., Tectonics and the gravity field in the continental interior, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 317-331, 1970.
46. McKeown, F. A., Hypothesis: Many earthquakes in the central and southeastern United States are causally related to mafic intrusive bodies, J. Res. U.S. Geol. Surv., 6, 41-50, 1978.
47. Melosh, H. J., Rheology of the Earth: Theory and observation, in Physics of the Earth's Interior, edited by A. M. Dziewonski and E. Boschi, pp. 318-335, North-Holland, New York, 1980.
48. Melosh, H. J., and A. Raefsky, The dynamical origin of subduction zone topography, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 60, 333-354, 1980.
49. Mooney, W. D., M. C. Andrews, A. Ginzburg, D. A. Peters, and R. M. Hamilton, Crustal structure of the northern Mississippi embayment and a comparison with other continental rift zones, Tectonophysics, 94, 327-348, 1983.
50. Nicholson, C., D. W. Simpson, S. Singh, and J. E. Zollweg, Crustal studies, velocity inversions, and fault tectonics: Results from a microearthquake survey in the New Madrid seismic zone, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 4545-4558, 1984.
51. Nunn, J. A., and J. R. Aires, Gravity anomalies and flexure of the lithosphere at the middle Amazon basin, Brazil, J. Geophys Res., 93, 415-428, 1988.
52. O'Connell, D. R., C. G. Bufe, and M. D. Zoback, Microearthquakes and faulting in the area of New Madrid, Missouri - Reelfoot Lake, Tennessee, in Investigations of the New Madrid, Missouri, Earthquakes Region, edited by F. A. Mckeown and L. C. Pakiser, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1236, 31-38, 1982.
53. Paterson, M. S., The mechanical behavior of rock under crustal and mantle conditions, in The Earth: Its Origin, Structure and Evolution, edited by M. W. McElhinny, pp. 469-489, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1979.
54. Ranalli, G., and D. C. Murphy, Rheological stratification of the lithosphere, Tectonophysics, 132, 281-295, 1987.
55. Richardson, R. M., Ridge forces, absolute plate motions, and the intraplate stress field, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 11,739-11,748, 1992.
56. Richardson, R. M., and L. M. Reding, North American plate dynamics, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 12,201-12,223, 1991.
57. Richardson, R. M., S. C. Solomon, and N. H. Sleep, Tectonic stress in the plates, Rev. Geophys., 17, 981-1019, 1979.
58. Sbar, M. L., and L. R. Sykes, Contemporary compressive stress and seismicity in eastern North America: An example of intraplate tectonics, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 84, 1861-1882, 1973.
59. Schatz, J. F., and G. Simmons, Thermal conductivity of Earth materials at high temperatures, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 6966-6983, 1972.
60. Schweig, E. S., and M. A. Ellis, Reconciling short recurrence intervals with minor deformation in the New Madrid seismic zone, Science, 264, 1308-1309, 1994.
61. Sonder, L. J., Effects of density contrasts on the orientation of stresses in the lithosphere: Relation to principal stress directions in the Transverse ranges, California, Tectonics, 9, 761-771, 1990.
62. Stauder, W., Present-day seismicity and identification of active faults in the New Madrid seismic zone, in Investigations of the New Madrid, Missouri, Earthquakes Region, edited by F. A. Mckeown and L. C. Pakiser, U S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1236, 21-30, 1982.
63. Strehlau, J., and R. Meissner, Estimation of crustal viscosities and shear stresses from an extrapolation of experimental steady state flow data, in Composition, Structure and Dynamics of the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere System, Geodyn. Ser., vol. 16, edited by K. Fuchs and C. Froidevaux, pp. 69-87, AGU, Washington, D. C., 1987.
64. Swanberg, C. A., B. J. Mitchell, R. L. Lohse, and D. D. Blackwell, Heat flow in the upper Mississippi embayment, in Investigations of the New Madrid, Missouri, Earthquakes Region, edited by F. A. Mckeown and L. C. Pakiser, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1236, 185-189, 1982.
65. Sykes, L. R., Intraplate seismicity, reactivation of pre-existing zones of weakness, alkaline magmatism, and other tectonism postdating continental fragmentation, Rev. Geophys., 16, 621-688, 1978.
66. Turcotte, D. L., and G. Schubert, Geodynamics: Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems, 450 pp., John Wiley, New York, 1982.
67. Walcott, R. I., Flexural rigidity, thickness, and viscosity of the lithosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 3941-3954, 1970.
68. Weertman, J., The creep strength of the Earth's mantle, Rev. Geophys., 8, 145-168, 1970.
69. Williams, C. A., and R. M. Richardson, A rheologically layered three-dimensional model of the San Andreas fault in central and southern California, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 16,597-16,623, 1991.
70. Zoback, M. D., and M. L. Zoback, State of stress and intraplate earthquakes in the central and eastern United States, Science, 213, 96-104, 1981.
71. Zoback, M. L., First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The world stress map project, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 11,703-11,728,1992a.
72. Zoback, M. L., Stress field constraints on intraplate seismicity in eastern North America, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 11,761-11,782, 1992b.
73. Zoback, M. L., and R. M. Richardson, Stress perturbation associated with the Amazonas and other ancient continental rifts, J. Geophys. Res., this issue.
74. Zoback, M. L., and M. D. Zoback, State of stress of the conterminous United States, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 6113-6156, 1980.
75. Zoback, M. L., and M. D. Zoback, Tectonic stress field of the continental United States, Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 172, 523-539, 1989.
76. Zoback, M. L., M. D. Zoback, A. J. Crone, M. N. Machette, and R. M. Richardson, Processes and patterns of intraplate seismicity (abstract), Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs, 26(7), A-382, 1994.