Adolescent and Adult Intellectual Development

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 246-251

  Ackerman, Phillip L ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

aging; intelligence; interests; knowledge; personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910026966     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721414534960     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AckermanP. L. (1996). (See References). Describes the PPIK framework for adult intellectual development
2. Ackerman P. L.,Lohman D. F.Handbook of educational psychology. 2006. Individual differences in cognitive functions. In AlexanderP. A.PintrichP. R.WinneP. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 139–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. A review of individual differences in cognitive functions, with special attention to educational issues.Alexander P. A.Pintrich P. R.Winne P. H., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006:139-161.
3. SchaieK. W. (1996). (See References). An extensive report on the Seattle Longitudinal Study of adult intellect.
4. von StummS.AckermanP. L. (2013). (See References). A meta-analytic review of the relations between “investment” constructs and intelligence
5. Ackerman P. L.A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge.Intelligence. 1996;22:229-259
6. Ackerman P. L.Domain-specific knowledge as the “dark matter” of adult intelligence: Gf/Gc, personality and interest correlates.Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences. 2000;55:P69-P84
7. Ackerman P. L.,Beier M. E.Determinants of domain knowledge and independent study learning in an adult sample.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006;98:366-381
8. Ackerman P. L.,Bowen K. R.,Beier M. B.,Kanfer R.Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2001;93:797-825
9. Ackerman P. L.,Heggestad E. D.Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits.Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121:219-245
10. Ackerman P. L.,Kanfer R.,Beier M. E.Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013;105:911-927
11. Ackerman P. L.,Kanfer R.,Calderwood C.High school Advanced Placement and student performance in college: STEM majors, non-STEM majors, and gender differences.Teachers College Record. 2013;115:1-43
12. Ackerman P. L.,Rolfhus E. L.The locus of adult intelligence: Knowledge, abilities, and non-ability traits.Psychology and Aging. 1999;14:314-330
13. Beier M. E.,Ackerman P. L.Current events knowledge in adults: An investigation of age, intelligence and non-ability determinants.Psychology and Aging. 2001;16:615-628
14. Beier M. E.,Ackerman P. L.Determinants of health knowledge: An investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;84:439-448
15. Beier M. E.,Ackerman P. L.Age, ability and the role of prior knowledge on the acquisition of new domain knowledge.Psychology and Aging. 2005;20:341-355
16. Binet A.,Simon T.L’Année Psychologique 11 Studies of individual differences: The search for intelligence. Jenkins J. J.Paterson D. G., ed. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1905:19190-24496.
17. Cacioppo J. T.,Petty R. E.The need for cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982;42:116-131
18. Cattell R. B.The measurement of adult intelligence.Psychological Bulletin. 1943;40:153-193
19. Cattell R. B.Personality and motivation structure and measurement. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book; 1957:
20. Costa P. T.,McCrae R. R.Revised NEO Personality Inventory and Five-Factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992:
21. Duckworth A. L.,Peterson C.,Matthews M. D.,Kelly D. R.Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;92:1087-1101
22. Goff M.,Ackerman P. L.Personality-intelligence relations: Assessing typical intellectual engagement.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1992;84:537-552
23. Hebb D. O.The effect of early and late brain injury upon test scores, and the nature of normal adult intelligence.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1942;85:275-292
24. Horn J. L.Fluid and crystallized intelligence: A factor analytic study of the structure among primary mental abilities. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International; 1965:
25. Lippman W.The mental age of Americans.New Republic. 1922;32:213-215
26. Miles C. C.,Miles W. R.The correlation of intelligence scores and chronological age from early to late maturity.American Journal of Psychology. 1932;49:44-78
27. Rolfhus E. L.,Ackerman P. L.Assessing individual differences in knowledge: Knowledge structures and traits.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999;91:511-526
28. Schaie K. W.Intellectual development in adulthood: The Seattle longitudinal study. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1996:
29. Spearman C.General intelligence objectively determined and measured.American Journal of Psychology. 1904;15:201-293
30. SternW. (1914). Educational psychology monographs no. 13: The psychological methods of testing intelligence (WhippleG. M., Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Warwick & York. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/psychologicalmet00ster#page/n5/mode/2up
31. Terman L. M.The measurement of intelligence. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1916:
32. von Stumm S.,Ackerman P. L.Investment and intelligence: A review and meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin. 2013;139:841-869
33. Willingham W. W.Predicting success in graduate education.Science. 1974;183:273-278