Rapid single-breath-hold 3D late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI using a stack-of-spirals acquisition

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1496-1502

  Shin, Taehoon ^a   Lustig, Michael ^b   Nishimura, Dwight G ^b   Hu, Bob S ^c  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Technicolor Palo Alto   (United States)

Author keywords

3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI; Parallel imaging reconstruction; Stack of spirals imaging

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOTERIDOL; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIAC PATIENT; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART CYCLE; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LATE GADOLINIUM ENHANCEMENT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PATIENT REFERRAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; AGED; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC USE; EVALUATION STUDY; HEART INFARCTION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; BREATH HOLDING; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84910010089     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24494     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002.
2. Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1985-1991.
3. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circ 2002;105:162-167.
4. Kellman P, Arai AE. Cardiac imaging techniques for physicians: late enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:529-542.
5. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1445-1453.
6. Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff GV, et al. Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function. Circ 2001;104:1101-1107.
7. Wu E, Ortiz JT, Tejedor P, et al. Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study. Heart 2008;94:730-736.
8. Yokota H, Heidary S, Katikireddy CK, et al. Quantitative characterization of myocardial infarction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts future cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:17.
9. Earls JP, Ho VB, Foo TK, Castillo E, Flamm SD. Cardiac MRI: recent progress and continued challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:111-127.
10. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Boesiger P. 2D SENSE for faster 3D MRI. Magma 2002;14:10-19.
11. Saranathan M, Rochitte C, Foo TK. Fast, three-dimensional freebreathing MR imaging of myocardial infarction: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:1055-1060.
12. Nguyen TD, Spincemaille P, Weinsaft JW, et al. A fast navigatorgated 3D sequence for delayed enhancement MRI of the myocardium: comparison with breathhold 2D imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:802-808.
13. Amano Y, Matsumura Y, Kumita S. Free-breathing high-spatialresolution delayed contrast-enhanced three-dimensional viability MR imaging of the myocardium at 3.0 T: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:1361-1367.
14. Kino A, Zuehlsdorff S, Sheehan JJ, et al. Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery turbo FLASH sequence for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scar. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W381-W388.
15. Foo TK, Stanley DW, Castillo E, et al. Myocardial viability: breath-hold 3D MR imaging of delayed hyperenhancement with variable sampling in time. Radiology 2004;230:845-851.
16. Dewey M, Laule M, Taupitz M, Kaufels N, Hamm B, Kivelitz D. Myocardial viability: assessment with three-dimensional MR imaging in pigs and patients. Radiology 2006;239:703-709.
17. Peukert D, Laule M, Taupitz M, Kaufels N, Hamm B, Dewey M. 3D and 2D delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for detection of myocardial infarction: preclinical and clinical results. Acad Radiol 2007;14:788-794.
18. Bauner KU, Muehling O, Theisen D, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with 3D MRI at 3 T. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1645-1650.
19. Goetti R, Kozerke S, Donati OF, et al. Acute, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction: quantitative comparison of 2D and 3D late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging. Radiology 2011;259:704-711.
20. Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:202-213.
21. Kerr AB, Pauly JM, Hu BS, et al. Real-time interactive MRI on a conventional scanner. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:355-367.
22. Nayak KS, Cunningham CH, Santos JM, Pauly JM. Real-time cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:655-660.
23. Santos JM, Cunningham CH, Lustig M, et al. Single breath-hold whole-heart MRA using variable-sensity spirals at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:371-379.
24. Salerno M, Sica CT, Kramer CM, Meyer CH. Optimization of spiral-based pulse sequences for first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1602-1610.
25. Shin T, Nayak KS, Santos JM, Nishimura DG, Hu BS. Three-dimensional first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI using a stackof-spirals acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:839-844.
26. Lustig M, Pauly JM. SPIRiT: iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med 2010;64:457-471.
27. Irarrazabal P, Meyer CH, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Inhomogeneity correction using an estimated linear field map. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:278-282.
28. Fessler JA, Sutton BP. Nonuniform fast Fourier transforms using min-max interpolation. IEEE Trans Signal Proc 2003;51:560-574.
29. Lima JA, Judd RM, Bazille A, Schulman SP, Atalar E, Zerhouni EA. Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. Circulation 1995;92:1117-1125.
30. Matsumoto H, Matsuda T, Miyamoto K, Shimada T, Mikuri M, Hiraoka Y. Peri-infarct zone on early contrast-enhanced CMR imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:610-618.
31. Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5:505-514.
32. Sutton BP, Noll D, Fessler JA. Fast, iterative image reconstruction for MRI in the presence of field inhomogeneities. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:178-188.
33. Sutton B, Noll D, Fessler J. Dynamic field map estimation using a spiral-in/spiral-out acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:1194-1204.