Acute, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction: Quantitative comparison of 2D and 3D late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging

Radiology

Volumn 259, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 704-711

  Goetti, Robert ^a   Kozerke, Sebastian ^c   Donati, Olivio F ^a   Sürder, Daniel ^a   Stolzmann, Paul ^a   Kaufmann, Philipp A ^a,b,d   Lüscher, Thomas F ^a,b   Corti, Roberto ^a,b   Manka, Robert ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DRUG MEGADOSE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCAR; SUBACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACUTE DISEASE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 79956327043     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11102216     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100(19):1992-2002. (Pubitemid 29529292)
2. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001;218(1):215-223. (Pubitemid 32151298)
3. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343(20):1445-1453.
4. Selvanayagam JB, Kardos A, Francis JM, et al. Value of delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in predicting myocardial viability after surgical revascularization. Circulation 2004;110(12):1535-1541. (Pubitemid 39297973)
5. Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA, Judd RM. Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation 1996;94(12):3318-3326. (Pubitemid 26427504)
6. Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM. How we perform delayed enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003;5(3):505-514. (Pubitemid 36859434)
7. Foo TK, Stanley DW, Castillo E, et al. Myocardial viability: breath-hold 3D MR imaging of delayed hyperenhancement with variable sampling in time. Radiology 2004;230(3):845-851. (Pubitemid 38252886)
8. Dewey M, Laule M, Taupitz M, Kaufels N, Hamm B, Kivelitz D. Myocardial viability: assessment with three-dimensional MR imaging in pigs and patients. Radiology 2006;239(3):703-709. (Pubitemid 43830605)
9. Kino A, Zuehlsdorff S, Sheehan JJ, et al. Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery turbo FLASH sequence for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scar. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(5):W381-W388.
10. Nguyen TD, Spincemaille P, Weinsaft JW, et al. A fast navigator-gated 3D sequence for delayed enhancement MRI of the myocardium: comparison with breathhold 2D imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27(4):802-808. (Pubitemid 351508095)
11. Peters DC, Appelbaum EA, Nezafat R, et al. Left ventricular infarct size, peri-infarct zone, and papillary scar measurements: A comparison of high-resolution 3D and conventional 2D late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30(4):794-800.
12. van den Bosch HC, Westenberg JJ, Post JC, et al. Free-breathing MRI for the assessment of myocardial infarction: clinical validation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(6):W277-W281.
13. Look DC, Locker DR. Time saving in measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 1970;41(2):250-251.
14. Amado LC, Gerber BL, Gupta SN, et al. Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(12):2383-2389. (Pubitemid 39647614)
15. Hsu LY, Natanzon A, Kellman P, Hirsch GA, Aletras AH, Arai AE. Quantitative myocardial infarction on delayed enhancement MRI. Part I: Animal validation of an automated feature analysis and combined thresholding infarct sizing algorithm. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;23(3):298-308. (Pubitemid 43364055)
16. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-542. (Pubitemid 34262671)
17. Bauner KU, Muehling O, Theisen D, et al. Assessment of Myocardial Viability with 3D MRI at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(6):1645-1650.
18. Kühl HP, Papavasiliu TS, Beek AM, Hofman MB, Heusen NS, van Rossum AC. Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence. Radiology 2004;230(2):576-582. (Pubitemid 38133825)