Taking guided learning theory to school: Reconciling the cognitive, motivational, and social contexts of instruction

Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 62-81

  Herman, Phillip ^a   Gomez, Louis M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909216774     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203878842     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2. Anderson, V. (1992). A teacher development project in transactional strategy instruction for teachers of severely reading-disabled adolescents. Teaching & Teacher Education, 8, 391-403.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy:The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4. Biancarosa, C., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading Next - a vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to the Carnegie corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
5. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
6. Bridgeland, J. M., DiIulio, J. J., Jr, & Morison, K. B. (2006). The Silent Epidemic. (Technical Report): The Gates Foundation.
7. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (in press). Organizing schools for improvement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 1-24.
10. Collins, C. (1991). Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. Journal of Reading, 34, 510-516.
11. Deakin Crick, R., McCombs, B., & Hadden, A. (2007). The ecology of learning: Factors contributing to learner-centered classroom cultures. Research Papers in Education, 22, 267-307.
12. Edelson, D. (2006). My world: A case study in adapting scientists' tools for learners. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
13. Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: Application to the implementation of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148-171.
14. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
15. Gomez, L. M., Herman, P., & Gomez, K. (2007). Integrating text in content-area classes:Better supports for teachers and students. Voices in Urban Education, 14, 22-29.
16. Herman, P., Gomez, L. M., Gomez, K., Williams, A., & Perkins, K. (2008). Metacognitive support for reading in science classrooms. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, & F. Prins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (342-349). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ICLS.
17. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
18. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141-184.
19. Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Matthews, C., Lamb, R., and LSA Research Group (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. In J. Psotka (Ed.). Special Issue of Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 87-109.
20. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
21. Koedinger, K., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239-264.
22. Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 109-113.
23. Kuhn, L., & Reiser, B. J. (2006). Structuring activities to foster argumentative discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
24. Lagemann, E. C. (2002). Usable knowledge in education. A memorandum for the Spencer Foundation Board of Directors. Retrieved from www.spencer.org/publications/usable_knowledge_report_ecl_a.htm.
25. Landauer, T., Foltz, P., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
26. Lau, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students' situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 8(2), 139-162.
27. Lemke, J. L. (2002, April). Complex systems and educational change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
28. Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Maroulis, S., & Gomez, L. M. (2008). Does "connectedness" matter? Evidence from a social network analysis within a small school reform. Teachers College Record, 110(9), 1901-1929.
30. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
31. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J., Almasi, J., et al. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 511-555.
32. Raudenbush, S. (2005). Learning from attempts to improve schooling: The contribution of methodological diversity. Educational Researcher, 34, 25-31.
33. Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berett-Koehler.
34. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
35. Winschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method:Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967.
36. Wise & O'Neill, Chapter 5, this volume.
37. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-840.