Building lines of communication and a research agenda

Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 351-367

  Duffy, Thomas M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909063914     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203878842     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-381.
2. Barab, Sasha & Duffy, Thomas (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481-486.
4. Barrows, H. S. (1992). The tutorial process. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
5. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
7. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding:Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
9. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice:toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
10. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23, 13-20.
11. Duffy, Thomas M., & Kirkley, Jamie R. (2004). Learning theory and pedagogy applied in distance learning: The case of Cardean University. In T. Duffy & J. Kirkley (Eds.), Learner centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
12. Engle, Randi (2008). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.
13. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76.
14. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
15. Kjersdam, F., & Enemark, S. (1994). The Aalborg experiment: Project innovation in university education. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University.
16. Kolodner, J., Camp, P., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J. Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom:Putting learning by design(tm) into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495-548.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
18. Lesh, R., Yoon, C., & Zawojewski, C. (2007). John Dewey revisited: Making mathematics practical versus making practice mathematical. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Models & modeling as foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 315-348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Mason, Lucia (2007). Introduction: Bridging the cognitive and sociocultural approaches in research on conceptual change: Is it feasible? Educational Researcher, 42, 1-7.
20. Orrill, C. H., Hannafin, M. J., & Glazer, E. M. (2004). Disciplined inquiry and the study of emerging technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technologies (2nd ed., pp. 335-354). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
21. Parsad, B., Lewis, L., & Ferris, E. (2001). Teacher preparation and professional development. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
22. Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423-451.
23. Perfetto, G. A., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. (1983). Constraints on access in a problem solving context. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), 24-31.
24. Savery, J., & Duffy, Thomas M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35, 31-38.
25. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today's children, tomorrow's society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274-289). New York: Guilford.
26. Schwartz, Daniel L., & Bransford, John D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475-522.
27. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
28. Sinatra, G. M., & Mason, L. (2007). Beyond knowledge: Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook on conceptual change (pp. 560-582). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
30. Stinson, John (2004). A continuing learning community for graduates of an MBA program: The experiment at Ohio University. In T. Duffy & J. Kirkley (Eds.), Learner centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education (pp. 167-182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
31. Wellman, B. (1971). Crossing social boundaries. Social Science Quarterly, 52, 602-624.
32. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Macmillan.
33. Whitney, P., Ritchie, B., & Clark, M. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 13, 133-146.