Dreaming fairness and re-imagining equality and diversity through participative aesthetic inquiry

Management Learning

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 577-592

  Page, Margaret ^a   Grisoni, Louise ^b   Turner, Arthur ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arts based inquiry; equality and diversity; liminal spaces; participative action; research inquiry; ways of knowing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908657079     PISSN: 13505076     EISSN: 14617307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1350507613486425     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahmed SCultural Politics of Emotion. London: Routledge; 2004:
2. Ahmed S.The language of diversity.Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2007;30 (2): 235-256
3. Bollas CThe Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. London: Free Association Books; 1987:
4. Broussine MCreative Methods in Organizational Research. London: SAGE; 2008:
5. Butler JGender Trouble. London: Routledge; 1990:
6. Cabinet Office – HM Government (2012) Equalities red tape challenge announcement. Available at: http://www.redtapechallenge.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/2012/05/equalities-rtc-announcement/ (accessed 20 August 2012).
7. Cameron JThe Artist’s Way: A Spiritual Path to Higher Creativity. London: Penguin Books; 1992:
8. Clare J,Zarbafi ASocial Dreaming in the 21st Century: The World We Are Losing. London: Karnac Books Ltd; 2009:
9. Cousin GOvercoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. Meyer JHLand R, ed. Oxford: Routledge; 2006:134-147.
10. Czarniawska B,Mazza C.Consulting as a liminal space.Human Relations. 2003;56 (3): 267-290
11. Darmer P,Grisoni L.Guest editors, special issue. The opportunity of poetry: Pursuing the liberty of poetics and poetry in organizing, leading and managing.Tamara. 2011;9 (1-2): 1-13
12. Dickinson EThe Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. Johnson TH, ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1955:
13. Douglas MPurity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1966:
14. Eisenstein HGender Shock, Practicing Feminism on Two Continents. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin; 1991:
15. Gayá Wicks PC,Rippin AJ.Art as experience: An inquiry into art and leadership using dolls and doll-making.Leadership. 2010;6 (3): 259-278
16. Grisoni LCreative Approaches to Organisation Research. Broussine M, ed. London: Sage Publications; 2008:108-127.
17. Grisoni LHandbook of Research on Knowledge Intensive Organizations. Kociatkjewicsz JJemelniak D, ed. San Francisco: IGI Global; 2009:98-115.
18. Grisoni L.Poem Houses: An arts based inquiry into making a transitional artefact to explore shifting understandings and new insights in presentational knowing.Organisational Aesthetics. 2012;1 (1): 23-37
19. Grisoni L,Collins B.Sense making through Poem Houses: an arts-based approach to understanding leadership.Visual Studies. 2012;27 (1): 35-4
20. Grisoni L,Page M.Two to the Power of Three: power coalitions in (women’s) collaborative leadership.Organization and Management Journal. 2010;7 (1): 13-25
21. Heron J,Reason P.A participative inquiry paradigm.Qualitative Inquiry. 1997;3 (3): 274-294
22. Heron J,Reason PHandbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Reason PBradbury H, ed. London: SAGE; 2001:179-188.
23. Horvath A,Thomassen B,Wydra H.Introduction: Liminality and cultures of change.International Political Anthropology. 2009;2 (1): 3-4
24. Keats JThe Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats. Cambridge, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company; 1899:
25. KleonA (2010) Newspaper Blackout. Harper Perennial. Available at: http://www.austinkleon.com/newspaperblackout/ (accessed 28 June 2012).
26. Lather PGetting Lost: Feminist Efforts towards a Double Science. New York: State University of New York Press; 2007:
27. Lave J,Wenger ESituated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991:
28. Lawrence WGIntroduction to Social Dreaming, Transforming Thinking. London: Karnac Books Ltd; 2005:
29. Lovenduski J,Randall VContemporary Feminist Politics: Women and Power in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993:
30. Mack K.Taking an aesthetic risk in management education: Reflections on an artistic aesthetic approach.Management Learning. 2012;0 (0): 1-19
31. Marshall J.Living life as inquiry.Systemic Practice and Action Research. 1999;12 (2): 155-171
32. Nussbaum MUpheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:
33. Page MLCritical management studies at work: Negotiating tensions between theory and practice. Wolfram Cox JLe Trent- Jones TVoronov MWeir D, ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2009:245-258.
34. Page ML.Gender mainstreaming, hidden leadership.Gender Work and Organization. 2011;18 (3): 318-330
35. Page ML,Jarvis C,Grisoni L.Gender Work and Organization International Conference; 2007Keele, University, Staffordshire, UK; 2007.
36. Page M,Gaggiotti H.A visual inquiry into ethics and change.Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal. 2012;7 (1): 72-85
37. Page M,Grisoni L, et al. 2007;:
38. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Reason PBradbury HReason PBradbury H, ed. London: SAGE; 2001:1-14.
39. Rees TMainstreaming Equality in the European Union. London: Routledge; 1998:
40. Rees T.Reflections on the uneven development of gender mainstreaming in Europe.International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2005;7 (4): 555-574
41. Rose GVisual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: SAGE; 2008:
42. Rowbotham SThe Past is Before Us: Feminism in Action Since the 1960s. London: Pandora; 1989:
43. Rowbotham SWomen in Movement: Feminism and Social Action. London: Routledge; 1992:
44. Seeley C.Unchartered territory: Imagining a stronger relationship between the arts and action research.Action Research. 2011;9 (1): 83-99
45. Seeley C,Reason PKnowing Differently: Arts-Based and Collaborative Research Methods. Liamputtong PRumbold J, ed. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2008:25-46.
46. Segal LMaking Trouble: Life and Politics. London: Serpent’s Tail; 2007:
47. Simpson PF,French R,Harvey CE.Leadership and negative capability.Human Relations. 2002;55 (10): 1209-1226
48. Strati AOrganizations and Aesthetics. London: SAGE; 1999:
49. Strati AThe handbook of experiential learning and management education. Reynolds MVince R, ed. London: Oxford University Press; 2007:70-88.
50. Taylor S,Ladkin D.Understanding arts based methods in managerial development.The Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2009;8 (1): 55-69
51. Tsoukas HComplex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:
52. Turner VThe Ritual Process: Structure and Anti Structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1974:96-130.
53. Van Gennep AThe Rites of Passage. London: Routledge; 1977:
54. Walby S.Introduction: Comparative gender mainstreaming in a global era.International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2005;7 (4): 453-470
55. Walby SGlobalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. London: SAGE; 2009:
56. Walby SThe Future of Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2011:
57. Warren S.Show me how it feels to work here.Ephemera. 2002;2 (3): 224-245