Method transfer from high-pressure liquid chromatography to ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography. I. A thermodynamic perspective

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1362, Issue , 2014, Pages 206-217

  Åsberg, Dennis ^a   Leśko, Marek ^a   Samuelsson, Jörgen ^b   Kaczmarski, Krzysztof ^b   Fornstedt, Torgny ^a  

^a KARLSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b RZESZOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Adsorption isotherm; Gradient elution; HPLC; Omeprazole; Quality by design; UHPLC

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; INTERFACIAL ENERGY;

GRADIENT ELUTION; HPLC; OMEPRAZOLE; QUALITY BY DESIGNS; UHPLC;

HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

BENZYLTRIETHYLAMMONIUM CHLORIDE; CYCLOHEPTANE DERIVATIVE; CYCLOHEPTANONE; NAPHTHALENESULFONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OMEPRAZOLE; QUATERNARY AMMONIUM DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ELUTION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOTHERM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PH; RELIABILITY; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRA PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES;

ADSORPTION; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84908571501     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.051     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Fekete S., Oláh E., Fekete J. Fast liquid chromatography: the domination of core-shell and very fine particles. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1228:57-71.
2. Szalka M., Kostka J., Rokaszewski E., Kaczmarski K. Analysis of related substances in bisoprolol fumarate on sub-2-μm adsorbents. Acta Chromatogr. 2012, 24:163-183.
3. Wren S.A.C., Tchelitcheff P. Use of ultra-performance liquid chromatography in pharmaceutical development. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1119:140-146.
4. Fekete S., Fekete J., Ganzler K. Validated UPLC method for the fast and sensitive determination of steroid residues in support of cleaning validation in formulation area. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2009, 49:833-838.
5. Evans A.M., DeHaven C.D., Barrett T., Mitchell M., Milgram E. Integrated nontargeted ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry platform for the identification and relative quantification of the small-molecule complement of biological systems. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:6656-6667.
6. Tettey-Amlalo R.N.O., Kanfer I. Rapid UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of ketoprofen in human dermal microdialysis samples. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2009, 50:580-586.
7. Abrahim A., Al-Sayah M., Skrdla P., Bereznitski Y., Chen Y., Wu N. Practical comparison of 2.7 μm fused-core silica particles and porous sub-2 μm particles for fast separations in pharmaceutical process development. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51:131-137.
8. Fekete S., Kohler I., Rudaz S., Guillarme D. Importance of instrumentation for fast liquid chromatography in pharmaceutical analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 87:105-119.
9. Musters J., van den Bos L., Kellenbach E. Applying QbD principles to develop a generic UHPLC method which facilitates continual improvement and innovation throughout the product lifecycle for a commercial API. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013, 17:87-96.
10. Rathore A.S., Winkle H. Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:26-34.
11. A. Rathore, R. Mahtre, Quality by Design for Biopharmaceuticals: Principles and Case Studies, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009.
12. Fallas M.M., Neue U.D., Hadley M.R., McCalley D.V. Further investigations of the effect of pressure on retention in ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:276-284.
13. Fekete S., Veuthey J.-L., McCalley D.V., Guillarme D. The effect of pressure and mobile phase velocity on the retention properties of small analytes and large biomolecules in ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1270:127-138.
14. Kaczmarski K., Gritti F., Kostka J., Guiochon G. Modeling of thermal processes in high pressure liquid chromatography: II. Thermal heterogeneity at very high pressures. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:6575-6586.
15. Gritti F., Martin M., Guiochon G. Influence of viscous friction heating on the efficiency of columns operated under very high pressures. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:3365-3384.
16. Olbe L., Carlsson E., Lindberg P. A proton-pump inhibitor expedition: the case histories of omeprazole and esomeprazole. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2:132-139.
17. Shin J.M., Cho Y.M., Sachs G. Chemistry of covalent inhibition of the gastric (H+, K+)-ATPase by proton pump inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126:7800-7811.
18. Åsberg D., Leśko M., Enmark M., Samuelsson J., Kaczmarski K., Fornstedt T. Fast estimation of adsorption isotherm parameters in gradient elution preparative liquid chromatography. I: The single component case. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1299:64-70.
19. Åsberg D., Leśko M., Enmark M., Samuelsson J., Kaczmarski K., Fornstedt T. Fast estimation of adsorption isotherm parameters in gradient elution preparative liquid chromatography II: The competitive case. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1314:70-76.
20. Guiochon G., Shirazi D.G., Felinger A., Katti A.M. Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography 2006, Academic Press, Boston, MA. 2nd ed.
21. Danckwerts P.V. Continuous flow system. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1953, 2:1-18.
22. Gritti F., Piatkowski W., Guiochon G. Comparison of the adsorption equilibrium of a few low-molecular mass compounds on a monolithic and a packed column in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 978:81-107.
23. Schoenmakers P.J., Billiet H.A.H., De Galan L. Influence of organic modifiers on the retention behaviour in reversed-phase liquid chromatography and its consequences for gradient elution. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 185:179-195.
24. Jandera P., Komers D. Fitting competitive adsorption isotherms to the experimental distribution data in reversed-phase systems. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 762:3-13.
25. Dose E., Jacobson S., Guiochon G. Determination of isotherms from chromatographic peak shapes. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63:833-839.
26. Fletcher R. A modified Marquardt sub-routine for non-linear least squares 1971, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, UK.
27. Rosés M., Bosch E. Influence of mobile phase acid-base equilibria on the chromatographic behaviour of protolytic compounds. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 982:1-30.
28. Gagliardi L.G., Castells C.B., Ràfols C., Rosés M., Bosch E. Effect of temperature on the chromatographic retention of ionizable compounds: II. Acetonitrile-water mobile phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1077:159-169.
29. Dolan J.W. Dwell Volume Revisited. LC GC N. A. 2006, 24:458-466.
30. Gritti F., Kazakevich Y., Guiochon G. Measurement of hold-up volumes in reverse-phase liquid chromatography: definition and comparison between static and dynamic methods. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1161:157-169.
31. Forssén P., Lindholm J., Fornstedt T. Theoretical and experimental study of binary perturbation peaks with focus on peculiar retention behaviour and vanishing peaks in chiral liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 991:31-45.
32. Lindholm J., Forssén P., Fornstedt T. Validation of the accuracy of the perturbation peak method for determination of single and binary adsorption isotherm parameters in LC. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:4856-4865.
33. Ottiger S., Kluge J., Rajendran A., Mazzotti M. Enantioseparation of 1-phenyl-1-propanol on cellulose-derived chiral stationary phase by supercritical fluid chromatography. II. Non-linear isotherm. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1162:74-82.
34. Samuelsson J., Fornstedt T. Calculations of the energy distribution from perturbation peak data-a new tool for characterization of chromatographic phases. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1203:177-184.
35. Enmark M., Samuelsson J., Undin T., Fornstedt T. Characterization of an unusual adsorption behavior of racemic methyl-mandelate on a tris-(3,5-dimethylphenyl) carbamoyl cellulose chiral stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:6688-6696.
36. Agmo Hernández V., Samuelsson J., Forssén P., Fornstedt T. Enhanced interpretation of adsorption data generated by liquid chromatography and by modern biosensors. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1317:22-31.
37. Stanley B.J., Guiochon G. Numerical estimation of adsorption energy distributions from adsorption isotherm data with the expectation-maximization method. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97:8098-8104.
38. Samuelsson J., Undin T., Törncrona A., Fornstedt T. Improvement in the generation of adsorption isotherm data in the elution by characteristic points method-the ECP-slope approach. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:7215-7221.
39. Samuelsson J., Undin T., Fornstedt T. Expanding the elution by characteristic point method for determination of various types of adsorption isotherms. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:3737-3742.
40. Villadsen J., Michelsen M.L. Solution of Differential Equation Models by Polynomial Approximation 1978, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
41. Kaczmarski K., Mazzotti M., Storti G., Mobidelli M. Modeling fixed-bed adsorption columns through orthogonal collocations on moving finite elements. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 21:641-660.
42. P.N. Brown, A.C. Hindmarsh, G.D. Byrne, Variable-Coefficient Ordinary Differential Equation Solver, available at: http://netlib.org.
43. Samuelsson J., Arnell R., Fornstedt T. Potential of adsorption isotherm measurements for closer elucidating of binding in chiral liquid chromatographic phase systems. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32:1491-1506.