Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Volumn 12, Issue , 2015, Pages 59-66

  Prager, Katrin ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EUROPE;

EID: 84908565441     PISSN: 18773435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.009     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Oerlemans N., Assouline G. Enhancing farmers' networking strategies for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 2004, 12:469-478.
2. Emery S.B., Franks J.R. The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers' concerns with current schemes?. J Rural Stud 2012, 28:218-231.
3. Franks J.R., McGloin A. Environmental co-operatives as instruments for delivering across-farm environmental and rural policy objectives: lessons for the UK. J Rural Stud 2007, 23:472-489.
4. Prager K., Reed M., Scott A. Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale-rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:244-249.
5. Dolman P., Lovett A., O'Riordan T., Cobb D. Designing whole landscapes. Landsc Res 2001, 26:305-335.
6. European Union Regulation (EU) No. 1305/2013 of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) 2013.
7. McKenzie A.J., Emery S.B., Franks J.R., Whittingham M.J. FORUM: landscape-scale conservation: collaborative agri-environment schemes could benefit both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but will farmers be willing to participate?. J Appl Ecol 2013, 50:1274-1280.
8. Blackstock K.L., Brown K., Davies B., Shannon P. Individualism, cooperation and conservation in Scottish farming communities. Rural governance. International perspectives 2007, 191-207. Routledge. L. Cheshire, V. Higgins, G. Lawrence (Eds.).
9. Boulton A., Lockett R., Seymour T. A Review and Evaluation of Collaborative Landscape-scale Management Initiatives 2012, Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report 598. http://www.snh.gov.uk/publications-data-and-research/publications/search-the-catalogue/publication-detail/%3Fid=2076.
10. Sutherland L.-A., Gabriel D., Hathaway-Jenkins L., Pascual U., Schmutz U., Rigby D., Godwin R., Sait S.M., Sakrabani R., Kunin W.E., et al. The 'Neighbourhood Effect': a multidisciplinary assessment of the case for farmer co-ordination in agri-environmental programmes. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:502-512.
11. Parkhurst G.M., Shogren J.F. Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:344-355.
12. Franks J.R., Emery S.B. Incentivising collaborative conservation: lessons from existing environmental Stewardship Scheme options. Land Use Policy 2013, 30:847-862.
13. Moore E.A., Koontz T.M. A typology of collaborative watershed groups: citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Soc Nat Resour 2003, 16:451-460.
14. Hardy S.D. Governments, group membership, and watershed partnerships. Soc Nat Resour 2010, 23:587-603.
15. Penker M., Enengel B., Mann C., Aznar O. Understanding landscape stewardship-lessons to be learned from public service economics. J Agric Econ 2013, 64:54-72.
16. Mettepenningen E., Vandermeulen V., Van Huylenbroeck G., Schuermans N., Van Hecke E., Messely L., Dessein J., Bourgeois M. Exploring synergies between place branding and agricultural landscape management as a rural development practice. Sociol Ruralis 2012, 52:432-452.
17. Mills J., Short C., Courtney P., Cairns A. Economics of Co-ordination in Environmental Stewardship. Report to Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs and Natural England 2012, Countryside and Community Research Institute.
18. Ulber L., Klimek S., Steinmann H., Isselstein J., Groth M. Implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of a payment scheme for environmental services from agricultural land. Environ Conserv 2011, 38:464-472.
19. Reed M., Moxey A., Prager K., Hanley N., Skates J., Bonn A., Evans C., Glenk K., Thomson K. Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes. Ecosyst Serv 2014, 9:44-53.
20. Wales Rural Observatory. The Pontbren Project. Farmers' experiences and lessons learned, 2013:. http://www.walesruralobservatory.org.uk/sites/default/files/Pontbren%20Project_0.pdf.
21. Enengel B., Penker M., Muhar A., Williams R. Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: an analytical framework and results from two case studies in Austria. J Environ Manag 2011, 92:1256-1267.
22. Enengel B., Penker M., Muhar A. Landscape co-management in Austria: the stakeholder's perspective on efforts, benefits and risks. J Rural Stud 2014, 34:223-234.
23. Short C., Griffiths R., Phelps J. Inspiring and Enabling Local Communities: an integrated delivery model for Localism and the Environment. Report to Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group and Natural England 2011, CCRI, Cheltenham.
24. Prager K., Vanclay F. Landcare in Australia and Germany: comparing structures and policies for community engagement in natural resource management. Ecol Manag Restor 2010, 11:187-193.
25. Prager K. Adaptives management in Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege-Die Rolle von Gruppen und Verbänden in Europa. Natur Landschaft 2011, 86:343-349.
26. Prager K. The Contribution of Multi-stakeholder Partnerships to Sustainable Landscape Management. Landscape Partners Project Report 2013, The James Hutton Institute, http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/LandscapePartners/publications.php.
27. Prager K. Landschaftspflege durch Verbände in Australien und Deutschland, Ein Vergleich der Landcare-Gruppen und Landschaftspflegeverbände. Natur Landschaft 2009, 41:89-96.
28. Glasbergen P. The environmental cooperative: self-governance in sustainable rural development. J Environ Dev 2000, 9:240-259.
29. Franks J.R., McGloin A. Joint submissions, output related payments and environmental co-operatives: can the Dutch experience innovate UK agri-environment policy?. J Environ Plan Manag 2007, 50:233-256.
30. Samways M.J., Bazelet C.S., Pryke J.S. Provision of ecosystem services by large scale corridors and ecological networks. Biodivers Conserv 2010, 19:2949-2962.
31. Franks J.R. The collective provision of environmental goods: a discussion of contractual issues. J Environ Plan Manage 2011, 54:637-660.
32. Goldman R.L., Thompson B.H., Daily G.C. Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 2007, 64:333-343.
33. Dwyer J. Policy integration for sustainable agricultural landscapes: taking stock of UK policy and practice. Landsc Res 2013.
34. Koontz T.M. Social learning in collaborative watershed planning: the importance of process control and efficacy. J Environ Plan Manag 2013, 57:1572-1593.
35. Glasbergen P. Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: the ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool. Environ Policy Gov 2011, 21:1-13.
36. Cong R.-G., Smith H.G., Olsson O., Brady M. Managing ecosystem services for agriculture: will landscape-scale management pay?. Ecol Econ 2014, 99:53-62.
37. Mills J., Gibbon D., Ingram J., Reed M., Short C., Dwyer J. Organising collective action for effective environmental management and social learning in Wales. J Agric Educ Ext 2011, 17:69-83.
38. Yaffee S.L. Cooperation: a strategy for achieving stewardship across boundaries. Stewardship Across Boundaries 1998, 299-324. Island Press. R.L. Knight, P.B. Landres (Eds.).
39. Wondolleck J.M., Yaffee S.L. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management 2000, Island Press, Washington, DC.
40. Davies B., Blackstock K.L., Brown K.M., Shannon P. Challenges in creating local agri-environmental cooperation action amongst farmers and other stakeholders 2004, The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen.
41. Prager K. Collective efforts to manage cultural landscapes for resilience. Resilience and the Cultural Landscape 2012, 205-223. Cambridge University Press. T. Plieninger, C. Bieling (Eds.).
42. Mills J., Ingram J., Reed M., Short C., Gibbon D., Dwyer J. Evaluation of key factors that lead to successful agri-environmental co-operative schemes. Report prepared for Welsh Assembly Government 2008, Countryside and Community Research Institute.
43. Shackleton C.M., Willis T.J., Brown K., Polunin N.V.C. Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management. Environ Conserv 2010, 37:1-4.
44. Lauber T., Decker D., Knuth B. Social networks and community-based natural resource management. Environ Manag 2008, 42:677-687.
45. Brunckhorst D.J. Using context in novel community-based natural resource management: landscapes of property, policy and place. Environ Conserv 2010, 37:16-22.
46. Gruber J. Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons. Environ Manag 2010, 45:52-66.
47. De Ros G., Mazzola A. Networking with landscape: local initiatives in an italian Alpine valley. Mt Res Dev 2012, 32:400-410.
48. Axelsson R., Angelstam P., Myhrman L., Sädbom S., Ivarsson M., Elbakidze M., Andersson K., Cupa P., Diry C., Doyon F., et al. Evaluation of multi-level social learning for sustainable landscapes: perspective of a development initiative in Bergslagen, Sweden. Ambio 2013, 42:241-253.
49. Termeer C.J.A.M., Stuiver M., Gerritsen A., Huntjens P. Integrating self-governance in heavily regulated policy fields: insights from a Dutch farmers' cooperative. J. Environ Policy Plan 2013, 15:285-302.
50. de Lijster E., Prager K. The Use of Indicators in Agri-environmental Management in the Netherlands. Indicators used by Dutch Agrarische Natuurverenigingen (ANVs) for Monitoring and Reporting their Activities 2012, The James Hutton Institute, http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/LandscapePartners/publications.php.