A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 451-460

  Moore, Elizabeth A ^a   Koontz, Tomas M ^b  

^a Great Lakes Commission   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Collaborative environmental management; Ecosystem management; Participation; Partnership; Policy; Watershed planning

Indexed keywords

LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TYPOLOGY; WATERSHED;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038043218     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920309182     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Center for Watershed Protection. 1998. Rapid watershed planning handbook: A comprehensive guide for managing urbanizing watersheds. Ellicott City, MD.
2. Christensen, N. L., J. H. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D'Antonio, R. Francis, J. F. Franklin, J. A. MacMahon, R. F. Noss, D. J. Parsons, C. H. Peterson, M. G. Turner, and R. G. Woodmansee. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecol. Appl. 6(3):665-691.
3. Collins, A., G. Constantz, S. Hunter, and S. Selin. 1998. Collaborative watershed planning: The West Virginia experience. Conserv. Voices 1(2):31-35.
4. Coughlin, C. W., M. L. Hoben, D. W. Manskopf, and S. W. Quesada. 1999. A systematic assessment of collaborative resource management partnerships. Unpublished master's project, University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor.
5. Glesne, C. 1999. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Longman.
6. Ingram, H. 1990. Implementation: A review and suggested framework. Public administration: The state of the discipline, ed. N. Lynn and A. Wildavsky, 462-480. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
7. Kenney, D. S. 1997. Resource management at the watershed level: An assessment of the changing federal role in the emerging era of community-based watershed management. Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law, Boulder.
8. Korfmacher, K. S. 1998. Invisible successes, Visible failures: Paradoxes of ecosystem management in the Albermarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study. Coastal Zone Manage. 26(3):191-212.
9. Korfmacher, K. S. 2000. What's the point of partnering? A case study of ecosystem management in the Darby Creek Watershed. Am. Behav. Sci. 44(4):548-564.
10. Krueger, R. A. 1994. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Leach, W. D., and N. W. Pelkey. 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: A review of the empirical literature. J. Water Resources Plan. Manage. November/December:378-385.
12. Lowi, T. 1972. Four systems of politics, policy, and choice. Public Admin. Rev. 33:298-310.
13. Moseley, C. 1999. New ideas, old institutions: Environment, community, and state in the Pacific Northwest. PhD dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
14. Natural Resources Law Center. 2000. University of Colorado. Watershed Questionnaire. http://www.colorado.edu/Law/NRLC/NRLC_Watershed_survey.html
15. Peterson, P. 1995. The price of federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16. Raccoon Creek Improvement Committee. 1999. Raccoon Creek News 3(1). McArthur, OH.
17. Steelman, T. A., and J. Carmin. 2002. Community based watershed remediation: Connecting organizational resources to social and substantive outcomes. In Toxic waste and environmental policy in the 21st century United States, ed. D. Rahm, 145-178. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
18. Thomas, C. W. 1999. Linking public agencies with community-based watershed organizations: Lessons from California. Policy Stud. J. 27(3):544-564.
19. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Commerce. 2000. Unified federal policy for a watershed approach to federal land and resource management. Fed. Reg. 65(202):62566-62572.
20. Weimer, D., and A. Vining. 1989. Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Yaffee, S. L., A. F. Phillips, I. C. Frentz, P. W. Hardy, S. M. Maleki, and B. E. Thorpe. 1996. Ecosystem management in the United States: An assessment of current experience. Washington, DC: Island Press.