Landscape co-management in Austria: The stakeholder's perspective on efforts, benefits and risks

Journal of Rural Studies

Volumn 34, Issue , 2014, Pages 223-234

  Enengel, Barbara ^a   Penker, Marianne ^a   Muhar, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Austria; Benefits; Co management; Efforts; Landscape governance; Participants; Risks

Indexed keywords

COMANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RURAL LANDSCAPE; STAKEHOLDER;

AUSTRIA;

EID: 84895751554     PISSN: 07430167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adhikari B., Lovett J.C. Transaction costs and community-based natural resource management in Nepal. J.Environ. Manag. 2006, 78(1):5-15.
2. Albrecht M. Hat sich Mediation als Instrument des Akzeptanzmanagements in der öffentlichen Verwaltung bewährt oder ist Mediation nur "mehr vom Selben"? Europäische Mediationskonferenz, Vienna, Austria 2007.
3. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Vegetationsökologie und Landschaftsplanung 2011, Projektpanorama, (accessed 30.06.11.). http://www.a-v-l.at/projekte-partner/projektpanorama/.
4. Arnstein S.R. Aladder of citizen participation. J.Am. Inst. Planners 1969, 35:216-224.
5. Standards der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung: Empfehlungen für die gute Praxis. Vienna, Austria 2008, Austrian Federal Chancellery.
6. Berkes F. Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. The Drama of the Commons 2002, 293-322. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, E.U. Weber (Eds.).
7. Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J.Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(5):1692-1702.
8. Birner R., Jell B., Wittmer H. Coping with co-management: a framework for analysing the co-operation between state and farmers' organisations in protected area management. Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change: Theories and Policies for European Agriculture, Elgar 2002, 46-65. Gloucestershire, Cheltenham. K. Hagedorn (Ed.).
9. Borrini-Feyerabend G. Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland 1996.
10. Buchecker M., Hunziker M., Kienast F. Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2003, 64:29-46.
11. Cooke B., Kothari U. Participation: the New Tyranny? 2001, Zed Books, London.
12. European landscape convention. Florence, 20.X.2000 2000, Council of Europe, Council of Europe Publications, Strasbourg.
13. Diduck A., Sinclair J.A. Public involvement in environmental assessment: the case of the nonparticipant. Environ. Manag. 2002, 29(4):578-588.
14. Enengel B., Muhar A., Penker M., Freyer B., Drlik S., Ritter F. Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development - an analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 105(1-2):106-117.
15. Enengel B., Penker M., Muhar A., Williams R. Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: an analytical framework and results from two case studies in Austria. J.Environ. Manag. 2011, 92(4):1256-1267.
16. Falconer K., Saunders C. Transaction costs for SSSIs and policy design. Land Use Pol. 2002, 19(2):157-166.
17. Franks J.R., Gloin A.M. Environmental co-operatives as instruments for delivering across-farm environmental and rural policy objectives: lessons for the UK. J.Rural Stud. 2007, 23:472-489.
18. Freese J., Rüffer C. Kooperativer Naturschutz in der Kulturlandschaft. Partizipation, Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven der politischen Ökonomie, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg 2005, 257-279. P.H. Feindt, J. Newig (Eds.).
19. Gailing L., Keim K.-D., Röhring A. Analyse von informellen und dezentralen Institutionen und Public Governance mit kulturlandschaftlichem Hintergrund in der Beispielregion Barnim 2006, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.
20. Görg C. Landscape governance. The "politics of scale" and the "natural" conditions of places. Geoforum 2007, 38(5):954-966.
21. Hägerstrand T. Alook at the political geography of environmental management. LLASS Working Paper No. 17. Department of Geography 1995, University College, Dublin, Ireland.
22. Hanna S. Efficiencies of User Participation in Natural Resource Management. Property Rights in a Social and Ecological Context. Case Study and Design Applications 1995, 59-67. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, Washington, D.C. S. Hanna, M. Munasinghe (Eds.).
23. Participation: from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development 2004, Zed Books, London. S. Hickey, G. Mohan (Eds.).
24. Hodge I. The governance of rural land in a liberalised world. J.Agric. Econ. 2007, 58(3):409-432.
25. Höppner C., Frick J., Buchecker M., Elsasser H. Evaluating a new participatory planning approach for sustainable landscape development in Switzerland: participatory techniques and social effects of Landscape Development Concepts (LDC). Sustainable Development and Planning II. Transactions of the Wessex Institute, Ashurst 2005, 1329-1341. WIT Press. C.A. Brebbia, A. Kungolos, E. Beriatos (Eds.).
26. Krütli P., Stauffacher M., Flüeler T., Scholz R.W. Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. J.Risk Res. 2010, 13:861-875.
27. Linder W., Vatter A. Kriterien zur Evaluation von Partizipationsverfahren. Planung und Kommunikation: Gestaltung von Planungsprozessen in Quartier, Stadt und Landschaft: Grundlagen, Methoden, Praxiserfahrungen, Bauverlag, Wiesbaden 1996, 181-188. K. Selle (Ed.).
28. Matthews R., Selman P. Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. J.Agric. Econ. 2006, 57:199-212.
29. Mburu J., Birner R., Zeller M. Relative importance and determinants of landowners' transaction costs in collaborative wildlife management in Kenya: an empirical analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 45(1):59-73.
30. McCann L., Colby B., Easter K.W., Kasterine A., Kuperan K.V. Transaction cost measurement for evaluating environmental policies. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 52(4):527-542.
31. McCann L., Easter K.W. Transaction costs of policies to reduce agricultural phosphorous pollution in the Minnesota River. Land Econ. 1999, 75(3):402-414.
32. McCauley D. Sustainable development and the 'governance challenge': the French experience with Natura 2000. Eur. Environ. 2008, 18(3):152-167.
33. Mitchell B. Participatory partnerships: engaging and empowering to enhance environmental management and quality of life?. Soc. Indic. Res. 2005, 71:123-144.
34. Newig J. Erleichtert Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung die Umsetzung (umwelt-)politischer Maßnahmen? Ein Modellansatz zur Erklärung der Implementationseffektivität. Partizipation, Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven der politischen Ökonomie, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg 2005, 89-115. P.H. Feindt, J. Newig (Eds.).
35. Olwig K.R. Landscape, Nature, and the Body Politic. From Britain's Renaissance to America's New World 2002, The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
36. O'Rourke E. Landscape planning and community participation: local lessons from Mullaghmore, the Burren National Park, Ireland. Landsc. Res. 2005, 30(4):483-500.
37. Ostrom E. The Institutional Analysis and Development Approach. Designing Institutions for Environmental and Resource Management: New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Elgar 1998, 68-89. Gloucestershire, Cheltenham. E.T. Loehman, D.M. Kilgour (Eds.).
38. Paavola J. Protected areas governance and Justice: theory and the european union's habitats directive. J.Integr. Environ. Sci. 2004, 1(1):59-77.
39. Paavola J. Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:93-103.
40. Penker M. Landscape governance for or by the local population? A property rights analysis in Austria. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(4):947-953.
41. Pinto-Correia T., Gustavsson R., Pirnat J. Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions - towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21:333-346.
42. Plummer R., Arai S.M. Co-management of natural resources: opportunities for and barriers to working with citizen volunteers. Environ. Pract. 2005, 7(4):221-234.
43. Poteete A.R., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice 2010, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
44. Prager K., Freese J. Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making - learning from a local- and a state-level approach in Germany. J.Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(2):1154-1167.
45. Provincial Government of Lower Austria. s.a. Unser Kulturlandschaftsprojekt. Vienna, Austria.
46. Rørstad P.K., Vatn A., Kvakkestad V. Why do transaction costs of agricultural policies vary?. Agric. Econ. 2007, 36:1-11.
47. Selle K. Klärungsbedarf. Planung und Kommunikation. Gestaltung von Planungsprozessen in Quartier, Stadt und Landschaft. Grundlagen, Methoden, Praxiserfahrungen 1996, 161-180. Bauverlag, Wiesbaden. K. Selle (Ed.).
48. Singleton S. Constructing Cooperation: the Evolution of Institutions of Comanagement 1998, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
49. Smith J.L. Acritical appreciation of the "bottom-up" approach to sustainable water management: embracing complexity rather than desirability. Local Environ. 2008, 13(4):353-366.
50. Soliva R., Rønningenb K., Bellac I., Bezakd P., Coopere T., Fløb B.E., Martyf P., Pottere C. Envisioning upland futures: stakeholder responses to scenarios for Europe's mountain landscapes. J.Rural Stud. 2008, 24:56-71.
51. Stenseke M. Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(2):214-223.
52. Tiemann S., Siebert R. Ecological networks implemented by participatory approaches as a response to landscape fragmentation: a review of German literature. Outlook Agric. 2009, 38(2):205-212.
53. United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity 1992, (accessed March, 2013). http://www.cbd.int/convention/text.
54. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 1998, UNECE, Aarhus convention, (accessed 30.06.11.). http://www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.htm.
55. Strategic plan 2009-2014, draft decision III/8. Unedited advance copy. Meeting of the Parties to the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Riga, June 11-13, 2008 2008, UNECE.
56. Verhaegen I., Van Huylenbroeck G. Hybrid Governance Structures for Quality Farm Products: a Transaction Cost Perspective 2002, Shaker Verlag, Aachen.
57. Wallington T.J., Lawrence G. Making democracy matter: responsibility and effective environmental governance in regional Australia. J.Rural Stud. 2008, 24:277-290.