Governments, group membership, and watershed partnerships

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 587-603

  Hardy, Scott D ^a  

^a MCDANIEL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative environmental management; Environmental policy; Institutional analysis; Watershed partnerships

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNMENT RELATIONS; LAND USE; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; WATERSHED;

GREAT LAKES [NORTH AMERICA]; LAKE ERIE;

EID: 77953408296     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920802534572     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bidwell, R. D., and C. M. Ryan. 2006. Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnAerships. Society Nat. Resources 19:827-843.
2. Born, S. M., and K. D. Genskow. 2000. The watershed approach: An empirical assessment of innovation in environmental management. Research Paper #7. Prepared for the National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC.
3. Clark, B. T., N. Burkardt, and M. D. King. 2005. Watershed management and organizational dynamics: Nationwide findings and regional variation. Environ. Manage. 36(2):297-310.
4. Conley, A., and M. A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society Nat. Resources 16:371-386.
5. Cortner, H. J., and M. A. Moote. 1999. The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
6. Fleishman, R. 2004. Watershed groups in Ohio: The effects of organizational characteristics on political behavior, accomplishments, and perceived effectiveness. Master's thesis, Ohio State University School of Natural Resources, Columbus.
7. Genskow, K. D., and S. M. Born. 2006. Organizational dynamics of watershed partnerships: A key to integrated water resources management. J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 135(December):56-64.
8. Grand River Partners, Inc. 2007. Mission statement. Painesville, Ohio. www.grandriverpartners.org (accessed 17 January 2007).
9. Hardy, S. D., and T. M. Koontz. 2006. Meandering streams of geography: An environmental and political analysis of collaborative watershed management in northeast Ohio's Lake Erie Basin. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the East Lakes Division of the Association of American Geographers, Toledo, OH, October.
10. Imperial, M. T. 1999. Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Environ. Manage. 24(4):449-465.
11. Imperial, M. T., and T. Hennessey. 2000. Environmental governance in watersheds: The importance of collaboration to institutional performance. Research Paper #18. Prepared for the National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC.
12. Koontz, T. M., and E. Johnson. 2004. One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sci. 37:185-204.
13. Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. W. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
14. Koontz, T. M., and C. W. Thomas. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Admin. Rev. 66(s1):111-121.
15. Korfmacher, K. S. 2000. Partnering for ecosystem management of the Darby Creek Watershed. Am. Behav. Sci. 44(4):548-564.
16. Leach, W. D., N. W. Pelkey, and P. A. Sabatier. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California & Washington. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 21(4):645-670.
17. Lubell, M. 2005. Do watershed partnerships enhance beliefs conducive to collective action? In Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management, ed. P. A. Sabatier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, 201-232. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Lubell, M., J. Schneider, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:148-163.
19. Moore, E., and T. M. Koontz. 2003. A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 16:451-460.
20. Nikolic, S. 2005. Impacts of state involvement on community-based collaborative watershed management. Master's thesis, Ohio State University School of Natural Resources, Columbus.
21. Sabatier, P. A., W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock. 2005. Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Steelman, T. A. 1999. Community based environmental management: Agency and community- driven efforts. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, November, Washington, DC.
23. Steelman, T. A., and J. Carmin. 2002. Community based watershed remediation: Connecting organizational resources to social and substantive outcomes. In Toxic waste and environmental policy in the 21st century United States, ed. D. Rahm, 145-179. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
24. Thomas, C. W. 1999. Linking public agencies with community-based watershed organizations: Lessons from California. Policy Stud. J. 27(3):544-564.
25. Thomas, C. W. 2008. Evaluating the performance of collaborative environmental governance. Paper prepared for the Consortium on Collaborative Governance Mini-conference, April, Santa Monica, CA.
26. West Creek Preservation Committee. 2006. Mission statement. Parma, OH. www.westcreek.org (accessed 4 December 2006).
27. Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28. Yaffee, S. L., A. F. Phillips, I. C. Frentz, P. W. Hardy, S. M. Maleki, and B. E. Thorpe. 1996. Ecosystem management in the United States: An assessment of current experience. Washington, DC: Island Press.